Skip to main content

Introduction to Animals in Environmental Education: Whither Interdisciplinarity?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Animals in Environmental Education

Abstract

At least since the mid-1990s, environmental education researchers have challenged the anthropocentrism and humanism of the field with their compelling portrayals of animals as subjects in a wide array of educational settings, including classrooms and informal spaces. Published during the early stages of what is now referred to as the “animal turn” in the humanities and social sciences, this scholarship—as well as research in animal cognitive science, anthropology, ethology, geography, history, philosophy, political science, sociology, and other disciplines—sparked a flurry of interest in developing curricula and pedagogy that address human understandings of and ethical/moral obligations to animals. Although anthropocentric and humanist paradigms still dominate some environmental education research and practice, a groundswell of contemporary scholarship—drawing on diverse theoretical perspectives in critical animal studies, critical disability studies, decolonization, fat studies, feminism and ecofeminism, humane education, Indigenous thought, postcolonialism, posthumanism, and queer studies—has begun to transform the field in significant ways. In this introductory chapter, we briefly review the influence of the animal turn on environmental education to situate the current volumes’ contribution to the field. To conclude, we briefly summarize the chapters, highlighting the significance of each for curriculum and pedagogy in environmental education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a recent comprehensive review of animal-focused education in the field, see Spannring (2017).

References

  • Adams, C. (1990/2015). Sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. New York, NY: Continuum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Affifi, R. (2011). What Weston’s spider and my shorebirds might mean for Bateson’s mind: Some educational wanderings in interspecies curricula. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 16, 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrzejewski, J. (2003). Teaching animal rights at the university: Philosophy and practice. Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal, 1, 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrzejewski, J., Pedersen, H., & Wicklund, F. (2009). Interspecies education for humans, animals, and the earth. In J. Andrzejewski, M. P. Baltodano, & L. Symcox (Eds.), Social justice, peace, and environmental education (pp. 136–154). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1984/2013). Artistotle’s politics (2nd ed., trans: Lord, C.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battiste, M. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and pedagogy in First Nations education: A literature review with recommendations. Prepared for the National Working Group on Education and the Minister of Indian Affairs, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. Ottawa, ON: INAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., & Russell, C. (1999). Life ties: Disrupting anthropocentrism in language arts education. In J. Robertson (Ed.), Teaching for a tolerant world: Grades K-6 essays and resources (pp. 68–89). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., & Russell, C. (2000). Beyond human, beyond words: Anthropocentrism, critical pedagogy, and the poststructuralist turn. Canadian Journal of Education, 25(3), 188–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boileau, E., & Russell, C. (2018). Insect and human flourishing in early childhood education: Learning and crawling together. In A. Cutter-Mackenzie, K. Malone, & E. Barratt Hacking (Eds.), Research handbook on childhoodnature: Assemblages of childhood and nature. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51949-4_65-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buller, H. (2015). Animal geographies II: Methods. Progress in Human Geography, 39(3), 378–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calarco, M. (2008). Zoographies. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corman, L. (2012). Impossible subjects: The figure of the animal in Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 16, 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corman, L. (2017). Ideological monkey wrenching: Nonhuman animal politics beyond suffering. In D. Nibert (Ed.), Animal oppression and capitalism, Volume 2: The oppressive and destructive role of capitalism (pp. 252–269). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corman, L., & Vandrovcová, T. (2014). Radical humility: Toward a more holistic critical animal studies pedagogy. In A. Nocella II, J. Sorenson, K. Socha, & A. Matsuoka (Eds.), Defining critical animal studies: An introduction to an intersectional social justice approach to animal liberation (pp. 135–157). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of anti-discrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cudworth, E., & Hobden, J. (2015). Liberation for straw dogs? Old materialism, new materialism, and the challenges of an emancipatory posthumanism. Globalizations, 12(1), 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deckha, M. (2012). Toward a postcolonial, posthumanist feminist theory: Centralizing race and culture in feminist work on nonhuman animals. Hypatia, 27(3), 527–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMello, M. (2010). Teaching the animal: Social sciences. New York, NY: Lantern Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. (1990). Animal rights and feminist theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 15(2), 350–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L. (2000). Ethical imagining: Ecofeminist possibilities and environmental learning. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 134–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L. (2002). Children’s wild animal stories: Questioning interspecies bonds. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 7(2), 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L. (2005). Bioregional teaching: How to climb, eat, fall, and learn from porcupines. In L. J. Muzzin & P. Tripp (Eds.), Teaching as activism: Equity meets environmentalism (pp. 269–280). Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L. (2013). Three degrees of separation: Accounting for naturecultures in environmental education research. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), The international handbook for research on environmental education (pp. 409–417). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L. (2014). Kinship imaginaries: Children’s stories of wild friendships, fear, and freedom. In G. Marvin & S. McHugh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human-animal studies (pp. 259–274). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L., & Dickinson, J. (2013). Psychological resilience, uncertainty, and biological conservation: Junctures between emotional knowledges, nature experiences, and environmental education. In M. E. Krasny & J. Dillon (Eds.), Trading zones in environmental education (pp. 159–184). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humes, B. (2008). Moving toward a liberatory pedagogy for all species: Mapping the need for dialogue between humane and anti-oppressive education. Green Theory & Praxis: The Journal of Ecopedagogy, 4(1), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Z. I. (2013). Animal: New directions in the theorization of race and posthumanism. Feminist Studies, 39(3), 669–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. (2003). Towards ecopedagogy: Weaving a broad-based pedagogy of liberation for animals, nature, and the oppressed people of the earth. Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal, 1, 26–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. (2008). Towards ecopedagogy: Weaving a broad-based pedagogy of liberation for animals, nature, and the oppressed people of the earth. In A. Darder, M. Baltodano, & R. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (2nd ed., pp. 552–540). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. (2011). Towards an animal standpoint: Vegan education and the epistemology of ignorance. In E. Malewksi & N. Jaramillo (Eds.), Epistemologies of ignorance in education (pp. 53–70). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. V., & Humes, B. (2009). Marching out from Ultima Thule: Critical counterstories of emancipatory educators working at the intersection of human rights, animal rights, and planetary sustainability. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko, A., & Ko, S. (2017). Aphro-ism: Essays on pop culture, feminism, and Black veganism from two sisters. New York, NY: Lantern Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasny, M. E., & Dillon, J. (2013). Trading zones in environmental education. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, N., & Öhman, J. (2018). A posthuman approach to human-animal relationships: Advocating critical pluralism. Environmental Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1450848

  • Lloro-Bidart, T. (2014). They call them ‘good-luck polka dots’: Disciplining bodies, bird biopower, and humananimal relationships at the Aquarium of the Pacific. Journal of Political Ecology, 21, 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloro-Bidart, T. (2015). “Culture as ability”: Organizing enabling educative spaces for humans and animals. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 20, 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloro-Bidart, T. (2017a). A feminist posthumanist political ecology of education for theorizing human-animal relations/relationships. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloro-Bidart, T. (2017b). Neoliberal and disciplinary environmentality and ‘sustainable seafood’ consumption: Storying environmentally responsible action. Environmental Education Research, 23(8), 1182–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloro-Bidart, T. (2018a). A feminist posthumanist ecopedagogy in/for/with animalscapes. Special issue of the Journal of Environmental Education, 49(2), 152–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloro-Bidart, T. (2018b). A feminist posthumanist multispecies ethnography for educational studies. Educational Studies, 54(3), 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloro-Bidart, T. (2018c). An ecofeminist account of trolling in cyberspace: Implications for environmental and social justice scholar-educatoractivists. Journal of Environmental Education, 49(4), 276–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloro-Bidart, T. (2018d). Cultivating affects: A feminist posthumanist analysis of invertebrate and human performativity in an urban community garden. Emotion, Space, and Society, 27, 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloro-Bidart, T., & Russell, C. (2017). Learning science in aquariums and on whalewatching boats: The political deployment of other animals. In M. P. Mueller, D. J. Tippins, & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Animals in science education: Ethics, curriculum, and pedagogy (pp. 41–50). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lukasik, J. M. (2013). Embracing my escape from the zoo: A (sometimes) true account of my curricular inquiry. Green Theory & Praxis Journal, 7(1), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupinacci, J., & Happel-Parkins, A. (2016). (Un)learning anthropocentrism: An ecojustice framework for teaching to resist human-supremacy in schools. In S. Rice & A. G. Rud (Eds.), The educational significance of human and non-human animal interactions (pp. 13–30). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K. (2016). Reconsidering children’s encounters with nature and place using posthumanism. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1), 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. (1983). Animals and why they matter. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nxumalo, F., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2017). Staying with the trouble’ in child-insect-educator common worlds. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1414–1426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, J. (2009). Under the knife: Animal dissection as a contested school science activity. Journal for Activist Science and Technology Education, 1(2), 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, J. (2013). ‘I didn’t feel right about animal dissection’: Student objectors share their science class experiences. Society and Animals, 21, 360–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, J., Watson, G. P. L., Russell, C. L., Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Fawcett, L., Kuhl, G., … Warkentin, T. (2010). Animal encounters in environmental education research: Responding to the question of the animal. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 15, 86–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Nxumalo, F. (2015). Unruly raccoons and troubled educators: Nature/culture divides in a childcare centre. Environmental Humanities, 7, 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., Taylor, A., & Blaise, M. (2016). Decentering the human in multispecies ethnographies. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices (pp. 149–167). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, H. (2004). Schools, speciesism, and hidden curricula: The role of critical pedagogy for human education futures. Journal of Futures Studies, 8(4), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, H. (2010). Is ‘the posthuman’ educable? On the convergence of educational philosophy, animal studies, and posthumanist theory. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(2), 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautio, P., Hohti, R., Leinonen, R., & Tammi, T. (2017). Reconfiguring urban environmental education with ‘shitgull’ and a ‘shop’. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1379–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, S. (2013). Three educational problems: The case of eating animals. Journal of Thought, 48(2), 112–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, S., & Rud, A. G. (2015). The educational significance of human and non-human animal interactions. New York, NY: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, B., & Rocha, S. (2015). School lunch is not a meal: Posthuman eating as folk phenomenology. Educational Studies, 51(6), 482–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. (2000). Why study whalewatching? Environmental education, nature experience, and the social construction of nature. In D. Hodson (Ed.), OISE Papers in STSE (Science-Technology-Society-Environment) Education (pp. 49–74). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. (2005). ‘Whoever does not write is written’: The role of ‘nature’ in post-post approaches to environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 11(4), 433–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. (2017). ‘Everything has to die one day:’ children’s explorations of the meanings of death in human-animal-nature relationships. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C., & Ankenman, M. J. (1996). Orangutans as photographic collectibles. Ecotourism and the commodification of nature. Tourism Recreation Research, 21(1), 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C., & Bell, A. C. (1996). A politicized ethic of care: Environmental education from an ecofeminist perspective. In K. Warren (Ed.), Women’s voices in experiential education (pp. 172–181). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C., & Fawcett, L. (2013). Moving margins in environmental education research. In R. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. Wals (Eds.), The international handbook for research on environmental education (pp. 369–374). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C., & Hodson, D. (2002). Whale watching as critical science education? Canadian Journal of Science and Technology Education, 2(4), 485–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C., & Semenko, K. (2016). We take “cow” as a compliment: Fattening humane, environmental, and social justice education. In E. Cameron & C. Russell (Eds.), The fat pedagogy reader: Challenging weight-based oppression through critical pedagogy (pp. 211–220). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snaza, N. (2015). Toward a genealogy of educational humanism. In N. Snaza & J. A. Weaver (Eds.), Posthumanism and educational research (pp. 17–29). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spannring, R. (2017). Animals in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spannring, R., & Grušovnik, T. (2018). Leaving the meatrix? Transformative learning and denialism in the case of meat consumption. Environmental Education Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1455076.

  • Taylor, A. (2017). Beyond stewardship: Common world pedagogies for the Anthropocene. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1448–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman, N., & Ostertag, J. (2011). Too many monkeys jumping in their heads: Animal lessons within young children’s media. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 16, 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, E., McKenzie, M., & McCoy, K. (2014). Land education: Indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspectives on place and environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Lloro-Bidart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lloro-Bidart, T., Banschbach, V.S. (2019). Introduction to Animals in Environmental Education: Whither Interdisciplinarity?. In: Lloro-Bidart, T., Banschbach, V.S. (eds) Animals in Environmental Education. Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98479-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98479-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98478-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98479-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics