Abstract
Intersectionality—a framework for understanding how multiple sources of power and disadvantage intersect and influence behaviours, practices, and outcomes—increasingly drives a growing body of research the world over. More recent work also focuses on translating these concepts and evidence into the policy sphere. This chapter explores the concepts of deep poverty, hyper entitlements, rationing, and leveraging as linked to the positionality and voice of different groups in the intersectional socioeconomic order. Both positionality and voice are important in determining what policies are enacted, how they come into being and are implemented, and what their impact might be on specific groups. The authors argue that for groups at both extremes of the socioeconomic order, important sources of inequality tend to reinforce each other, albeit in opposing directions. Synergies of this kind do not hold for groups in the middle of the order for whom different sources of advantage and disadvantage may work against each other. These differences also account for the shifting positionality and voice of particular groups across geographic locales and time. They shape the fluidity of relations among groups, as manifested in complex politics of accommodation, negotiation, collaboration, and opposition, with important implications for policy formulation and implementation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
EAG states in India and C-category districts in the state of Karnataka refer to the regions that lag behind in the demographic transition and are socioeconomically backward.
- 2.
The concept of multidimensional poverty comes closest to such an approach, but it has tended thus far to identify the presence of different dimensions with less attention to the interactions among them (Bourguignon and Chakravarty 2003). It has also focused more on outcomes such as health or education (Alkire et al. 2016), rather than on the underlying power relations such as caste or gender that define intersectionality.
- 3.
We do not mean to suggest that these multiple relations of power and privilege do not affect (for better or worse) those who are higher up the socioeconomic spectrum. We discuss this phenomenon later in the chapter.
- 4.
Of course, programme implementers may focus on low-hanging fruit for other reasons including their own beliefs, practices, and biases.
- 5.
The term tribal has a long and complex history in the context of India, which we cannot get into here. However, it may be seen as the rough equivalent of an ethnic or an indigenous minority in other contexts.
- 6.
Lack of attention to intersections may not be the only reason that conditional cash transfers may not work.
- 7.
- 8.
As exemplified by the continuing challenges to the US Supreme Court’s Brown vs Board of Education ruling favouring affirmative action, or the middle-class struggles against the recent Right to Education Act in India (Sarin and Gupta 2014).
- 9.
Though not the very poorest.
- 10.
These include the Rajiv Aarogyasri Scheme in the state of Andhra Pradesh (since 2007), the Chief Minister’s Kalaignar Insurance Scheme for life-saving treatments in Tamil Nadu (since 2009; rechristened Chief Minister’s Comprehensive Health Insurance Scheme since 2011), the Vajpayee Arogyashree Scheme in Karnataka (since 2011), and the Rajiv Gandhi Jeevandayee Arogya Yojana in Maharashtra (since 2012).
- 11.
‘Floater’ refers to the fact that all members of the household are registered under a single card, and the amount available can be used for any one or any combination of them.
- 12.
This list is based on population-based surveys of BPL households conducted by state governments across India in 2002. Each BPL family is identified by the member designated as the household’s head (Ram et al. 2009). Households excluded in this way will also include female-headed households whose former male head may have either died recently or who may have abandoned the household.
- 13.
The relevant social criteria will obviously vary depending upon the context.
References
Agarwal, B. (1997). “Bargaining” and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51.
Alkire, S., Jindra, C., Robles, G., & Vaz, A. (2016, June). Multidimensional Poverty Index – Summer 2016: Brief Methodological Note and Results. OPHI Briefing 42. Oxford: University of Oxford.
Anand, S., & Fan, V. (2016). The Health Workforce in India. Human Resources for Health Observer Series No. 16. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Bassel, L., & Emejulu, A. (2010). Struggles for Institutional Space in France and the United Kingdom: Intersectionality and the Politics of Policy. Politics and Gender, 6(4), 517–544. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X10000358.
Bennett, F. (2013). Researching Within-Household Distribution: Overview, Developments, Debates, and Methodological Challenges. Family Relations, 75, 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12020.
Berman, P., Ahuja, R., & Bhandari, L. (2010). The Impoverishing Effect of Healthcare Payments in India: New Methodology and Findings. Economic and Political Weekly, XLV(16), 65–71.
Borooah, V. K., Sabharwal, N. S., Diwakar, D. G., Mishra, V. K., & Naik, A. K. (2015). Caste, Discrimination, and Exclusion in Modern India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Bourguignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. R. (2003). The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 1, 25–49.
Cerceau, S. (2012, December). Gender Equality in Access to Health Care: The Role of Social Health Protection. A Case Study on India’s National Health Insurance Scheme RSBY. GIZ Discussion Papers on Social Protection, no. 15.
CSDH (Commission on Social Determinants of Health). (2008). Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Damoon, R. K. (2011). Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 230–243.
Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspectives on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85.
Dutta, M., & Husain, Z. (2013). Does Health Insurance Ensure Equitable Health Outcomes? An Analysis of Hospital Services Usage in Urban India. World Health Population, 14(4), 38–50.
Folbre, N. (1986). Hearts and Spades: Paradigms of Household Economics. World Development, 14(2), 245–255.
Gavaskar, M. (2015). Patidar Anamat Andolan: Reinventing a Social Identity. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(40), 1–2, http://www.epw.in/node/145894/pdf.
Government of India. (2006). Social, Economic and Educational Status of the Muslim Community of India: A Report. Prime Minister’s High Level Committee. New Delhi: Cabinet Secretariat, Government of India.
Hancock, A.-M. (2007). When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070065.
Hankivsky, O., & Cormier, R. (2011). Intersectionality and Public Policy: Some Lessons from Existing Models. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 217–229.
Hankivsky, O., Grace, D., Hunting, G., Giesbrecht, M., Fridkin, A., Rudrum, S., et al. (2014). An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework: Critical Reflections on a Methodology for Advancing Equity. International Journal for Equity in Health, 13, 119 Retrieved from http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/13/1/119.
Iyer, A., Sen, G., & George, A. (2007). The Dynamics of Gender and Class in Access to Health Care: Evidence from Rural Karnataka, India. International Journal of Health Services, 37(3), 537–554.
Jain, K. (2013, June). Health Financing and Delivery in India: An Overview of Selected Schemes. WIEGO Working Paper (Social Protection), no. 29.
Joe, W. (2014). Intersectional Inequalities in Immunization in India, 1992–93 to 2005–06: A Progress Assessment. Health Policy and Planning, 30, 407–422.
Katz, E. (1997). The Intra-Household Economics of Voice and Exit. Feminist Economics, 3(3), 25–46.
Kidd, S. (2014, April). Social Exclusion and Access to Social Protection Schemes. Australian Government, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Retrieved from http://www.developmentpathways.co.uk/resources/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/social-exclusion-and-access-to-social-protection-schemes4.pdf.
Krieger, N. (2005). Embodiment: A Conceptual Glossary for Epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.024562.
Krieger, N., & Smith, G. D. (2004). ‘Bodies Count’, and Body Counts: Social Epidemiology and Embodying Inequality. Epidemiologic Reviews, 26, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxh009.
Lombardo, E., & Agustin, L. R. (2012). Framing Gender Intersections in the European Union: What Implications for the Quality of Intersectionality in Policies? Social Politics, 19(4), 482–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr001.
Manuel, T. (2006). Envisioning the Possibilities for a Good Life: Exploring the Public Policy Implications of Intersectionality Theory. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 28(3–4), 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1300/J501v28n03_08.
Nandi, A., Ashok, A., & Laxminarayan, R. (2013). The Socioeconomic and Institutional Determinants of Participation in India’s Health Insurance Scheme for the Poor. PLoS One, 8(6), e66296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066296.
Narayana, D. (2010). Review of the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana. Economic and Political Weekly, XLV(29), 13–18.
NRHM (National Rural Health Mission). (2013). Guidance Note for Implementation of RMNCH+A Interventions in High Priority Districts, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of India: New Delhi.
Parken, A., & Young, H. (2007). Integrating the Promotion of Equality and Human Rights for All, Cardiff, Wales: Towards the Commission of Equality and Human Rights. Unpublished Report for the Welsh Assembly Government and Equality and Human Rights Commission; Cited by Hankivsky, O. & Cormier, R. (2011). Intersectionality and Public Policy: Some Lessons from Existing Models. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 217–229.
Ram, F., Mohanty, S. K., & Ram, U. (2009). Understanding the Distribution of BPLCards: All-India and Selected States. Economic and Political Weekly, XLIV(7), 66–71.
Rao, K. S. (2013, June 26). Doctors by Merit, Not Privilege. The Hindu, p. 10.
Rathi, P., Mukherji, A., & Sen, G. (2012). Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana: Evaluating Utilisation, Roll-Out and Perceptions in Amaravati District, Maharashtra. Economic and Political Weekly, XLVII(39), 57–63.
Sarin, A., & Gupta, S. (2014, September 20). Not Leading Towards an Egalitarian Education System: Quotas Under the Right to Education. Economic and Political Weekly, 49 (38), 65–72.
Sen, G. (2010). Poor Households or Poor Women: Is There a Difference? In S. Chant (Ed.), The International Handbook on Gender and Poverty (pp. 101–105). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publication.
Sen, G. (2012). Universal Health Coverage in India: A Long and Winding Road. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(8), 46–52.
Sen, G., & Iyer, A. (2012). Who Gains, Who Loses, and How: Leveraging Gender and Class Intersections to Secure Health Entitlements. Social Science and Medicine, 74(11), 1802–1811.
Sen, G., & Iyer, A. (2015). Health Policy in India: Some Critical Concerns. In E. Kuhlmann, R. H. Blank, I. L. Bourgeault, & C. Wendt (Eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook of Healthcare Policy and Governance (pp. 154–170). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sen, G., Iyer, A., & Mukherjee, C. (2009). A Methodology to Analyse the Intersections of Social Inequalities in Health. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(3), 397–415.
Sen, G., Iyer, A., Virani, A., Reddy, B., & Selvakumar, S. (2017). Translating Health Research to Policy: Breaking Through the Impermeability Barrier. In J. Georgalakis, N. Jessani, R. Oronje, & B. Ramalingam (Eds.), The Social Realities of Knowledge for Development (pp. 32–51). Brighton: IDS/Impact Initiative.
Smooth, W. G. (2013). Intersectionality from Theoretical Framework to Policy Intervention. In A. R. Wilson (Ed.), Situating Intersectionality: Politics, Policy and Power (pp. 11–43). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sun, C. (2011). An Analysis of RSBY Enrolment Patterns: Preliminary Evidence and Lessons from the Early Experience. In R. Palacios, J. Das, & C. Sun (Eds.), India’s Health Insurance for the Poor. Evidence from the Early Experience of the Rashtriya Swathya Bima Yojana (pp. 84–116). New Delhi: Centre for Policy Research.
Sundararaman, T., & Muraleedharan, V. R. (2015). Falling Sick, Paying the Price: NSS 71st Round on Morbidity and Costs of Healthcare. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(33), 17–20.
Swarup, A., & Jain, N. (n.d.). Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana – A Case Study from India. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from http://www.rsby.gov.in/Documents.aspx?ID=14.
Tilche, A. (2016). Migration, Bachelorhood and Discontent Among the Patidars. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(26–27), 17–24.
Townsend, P. B., Whitehead, M., & Davidson, N. (1992). Inequalities in Health: The Black Report and the Health Divide (new 3rd ed.). London: Penguin Books Ltd.
van Deurzen, I., van Oorschot, W., & van Ingen, E. (2014). The Link Between Inequality and Population Health in Low and Middle Income Countries: Policy Myth or Social Reality? PLoS One, 9(12), e115109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115109.
Vijaya, R. M., Lahoti, R., & Swaminathan, H. (2014). Moving from the Household to the Individual: Multidimensional Poverty Analysis. World Development, 59, 70–81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.029.
Walby, S., Armstrong, J., & Strid, S. (2012). Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory. Sociology, 46(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511416164.
Whitehead, M., Dahlgren, G., & Evans, T. (2001). Equity and Health Sector Reforms: Can Low-Income Countries Escape the Medical Poverty Trap? The Lancet, 358, 833–836.
Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin Books.
Wilson, A. R. (Ed.). (2013). Situating Intersectionality: Politics, Policy and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
World Bank. (2016). World Development Indicators. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.PUBL.ZS?view=chart.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sen, G., Iyer, A. (2019). Beyond Economic Barriers: Intersectionality and Health Policy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. In: Hankivsky, O., Jordan-Zachery, J.S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy. The Politics of Intersectionality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98473-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98473-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98472-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98473-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)