Skip to main content

Imaging of Oculomotor (Third) Cranial Nerve Palsy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Neuro-Ophthalmology

Abstract

The evaluation of an isolated third cranial nerve palsy can be difficult and dangerous. The choices for initial imaging of a third nerve palsy is challenging in part because of the number of potential neuroimaging choices (e.g., magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA), or routine MRI or CT scan). This chapter describes the clinical guidelines in the evaluation of third nerve palsy, reviews the neuroimaging techniques, and outlines potential the advantages and disadvantages of each type of imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vaphiades MS, Horton JA. MRA or CTA, that’s the question. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50:406–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kissel JT, Burde RM, Klingele TG, Zeiger HE. Pupil-sparing oculomotor palsies with internal carotid-posterior communicating artery aneurysms. Ann Neurol. 1983;13:149–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Trobe JD. Third nerve palsy and the pupil. Footnotes to the rule. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:601–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Trobe JD. Managing oculomotor nerve palsy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:798.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobson DM. Pupil involvement in patients with diabetes-associated oculomotor nerve palsy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:723–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobson DM. Relative pupil-sparing third nerve palsy: etiology and clinical variables predictive of a mass. Neurology. 2001;56:797–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yousem DM, Grossman RI. Neuroradiology: the requisites, vol. 13. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby, Inc; 2010. p. 160–3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mayberg MR, Batjer HH, Dacey R, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the stroke council, American heart association. Circulation. 1994;90:2592–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Orz Y, AlYamany M. The impact of size and location on rupture of intracranial aneurysms. Asian J Neurosurg. 2015;10:26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. The International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms—risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1725–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, Meissner I, Brown RD Jr, Piepgras DG, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362:103–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Elmalem VI, Hudgins PA, Bruce BB, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Underdiagnosis of posterior communicating artery aneurysm in noninvasive brain vascular studies. J Neuroophthalmol. 2011;31:103–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Modic MT, Ruggieri PM, Haacke EM, Selman WR. Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation by MR Angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1990;11:449–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. White PM, Wardlaw JM. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neuroradiol. 2003;30:336–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobson DM, Trobe JD. The emerging role of magnetic resonance angiography in the management of patients with third cranial nerve palsy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;28:94–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee AG, Hayman LA, Brazis PW. The evaluation of isolated third nerve palsy revisited: an update on the evolving role of magnetic resonance, computed tomography, and catheter angiography. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47:137–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson GB, Ashforth R, Steinke DE, et al. CT angiography for the detection and characterization of carotid artery bifurcation disease. Stroke. 2000;31:2168–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thiex R, Norbash AM, Frerichs KU. The safety of dedicated-team catheter-based diagnostic cerebral angiography in the era of advanced noninvasive imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:230–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Villablanca JP, Jahan R, Hooshi P, Lim S, Duckwiler G, Patel A, Sayre J, Martin N, Frazee J, Bentson J, Viñuela F. Detection and characterization of very small cerebral aneurysms by using 2D and 3D helical CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1187–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chaudhary N, Davagnanam I, Ansari SA, Pandey A, Thompson BG, Gemmete JJ. Imaging of intracranial aneurysms causing isolated third cranial nerve palsy. J Neuroophthalmol. 2009;29:238–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. El Khaldi M, Pernter P, Ferro F, et al. Detection of cerebral aneurysms in nontraumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage: role of multislice CT angiography in 130 consecutive patients. Radiol Med. 2007;112:123–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Menke J, Larsen J, Kallenberg K. Diagnosing cerebral aneurysms by computed tomographic angiography: meta-analysis. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:646–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tang K, Li R, Lin J, Zheng X, Wang L, Yin W. The value of cerebral CT angiography with low tube voltage in detection of intracranial aneurysms. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:876796.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ringelstein A, Lechel U, Fahrendorf DM, Altenbernd JV, Forsting M, Schlamann M. Radiation exposure in perfusion CT of the brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014;38:25–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Prokop M, Debatin JF. MRI contrast media: new developments and trends. CTA vs. MRA. Eur Radiol. 1997;7(Suppl 5):299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaufman DI. Magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomographic angiography, conventional angiography: when to use and why. Recent advances in brain angiography and the impact on neuro-ophthalmology. AAO Neuro-Ophthalmology Subspecialty Day Course Syllabus; 2001. pp 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jäger HR, Grieve JP. Advances in non-invasive imaging of intracranial vascular disease. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82:1–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Balcer LJ, Galetta SL, Yousem DM, et al. Pupil-involving third nerve palsy and carotid stenosis: rapid recovery following endarterectomy. Ann Neurol. 1997;41:273–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kupersmith MJ, Heller G, Cox TA. Magnetic resonance angiography and clinical evaluation of third nerve palsies and posterior communicating artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:228–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sailer AM, Wagemans BA, Nelemans PJ, de Graaf R, van Zwam WH. Diagnosing intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2014;45:119–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Canadian Neuroophthalmology Group. IV. Neuropathies and Nuclear Palsies; (n.d.). http://www.neuroophthalmology.ca/textbook/disorders-of-eye-movements/iv-neuropathies-and-nuclear-palsies/i-iii-nerve-palsy.

  33. Fang C, Leavitt JA, Hodge DO, Holmes JM, Mohney BG, Chen JJ. Incidence and etiologies of acquired third nerve palsy using a population-based method. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Aneurysm Complications; (n.d.). https://www.bafound.org/about-brain-aneurysms/risk-factors/aneurysm-complications/.

  35. The Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory, 2015; (n.d.). https://www.cadth.ca/canadian-medical-imaging-inventory-2015.

  36. Barua B, Rovere MC, Skinner BJ. Waiting your turn: wait times for health care in Canada 2010 report. SSRN Electr J. 2011. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1783079.

  37. Byrne SC, Barrett B, Bhatia R. The impact of diagnostic imaging wait times on the prognosis of lung cancer. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2015;66(1):53–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2014.01.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Emery DJ, Forster AJ, Shojania KG, Magnan S, Tubman M, Feasby TE. Management of MRI Wait Lists in Canada; 2009. https://www.longwoods.com/content/20537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Diagnostic Imaging Dataset Annual Statistical Release 2015/16; 2016. https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/

  40. Yang ZL, Ni QQ, Schoepf UJ, Cecco CN, Lin H, Duguay TM, et al. Small intracranial aneurysms: diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography. Radiology. 2017;285(3):941–52. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017162290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Romijn M, Andel HG, Walderveen MV, Sprengers M, Rijn JV, Rooij WV, Majoie C. Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography with matched mask bone elimination for detection of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;29(1):134–9. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a0741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mericle R, Bansal N, Goddard T, Tomycz L, Hawley C, Ayad M. “Real-world” comparison of non-invasive imaging to conventional catheter angiography in the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2(1):134. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.85607.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Taha MM, Nakahara I, Higashi T, Iwamuro Y, Iwaasa M, Watanabe Y, Munemitsu T. Endovascular embolization vs surgical clipping in treatment of cerebral aneurysms: morbidity and mortality with short-term outcome. Surg Neurol. 2006;66(3):277–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2005.12.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gupta V, Gupta A, Kaur G, Jha A, Chinchure S, Goel G. A decade after International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial: coiling as a first choice treatment in the management of intracranial aneurysms—technical feasibility and early management outcomes. Asian J Neurosurg. 2014;9(3):137. https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.142733.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Davies JM, Lawton MT. Advances in open microsurgery for cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2014:74, S7–16. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000000193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Frontera JA, Moatti J, Reyes KM, McCullough S, Moyle H, Bederson JB, Patel A. Safety and cost of stent-assisted coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms compared with coiling or clipping. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012;6(1):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. John S, Bain MD, Hui FK, Hussain MS, Masaryk TJ, Rasmussen PA, Toth G. Long-term follow-up of in-stent stenosis after pipeline flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2016;78(6):862–7. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000001146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by an unrestricted grant from the Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, NY.

A.J.S. is funded by an NIHR Clinician Scientist Fellowship (NIHR-CS-011-028).

There are no commercial or financial conflicts of interest and any funding sources by either author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. Vaphiades .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vaphiades, M.S., ten Hove, M.W., Matthews, T., Roberson, G.H., Sinclair, A. (2019). Imaging of Oculomotor (Third) Cranial Nerve Palsy. In: Lee, A., Sinclair, A., Sadaka, A., Berry, S., Mollan, S. (eds) Neuro-Ophthalmology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98455-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98455-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98454-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98455-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics