Skip to main content

Automatic Discovery and Exploitation of Promising Subproblems for Tabulation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2018)

Abstract

The performance of a constraint model can often be improved by converting a subproblem into a single table constraint. In this paper we study heuristics for identifying promising subproblems. We propose a small set of heuristics to identify common cases such as expressions that will propagate weakly. The process of discovering promising subproblems and tabulating them is entirely automated in the tool Savile Row. A cache is implemented to avoid tabulating equivalent subproblems many times. We give a simple algorithm to generate table constraints directly from a constraint expression in Savile Row. We demonstrate good performance on the benchmark problems used in earlier work on tabulation, and also for several new problem classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mohr, R., Masini, G.: Good old discrete relaxation. In: Proceedings of ECAI 1988, pp. 651–656. Pitman Publishing (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gent, I.P., Jefferson, C., Miguel, I., Nightingale, P.: Data structures for generalised arc consistency for extensional constraints. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2007, pp. 191–197. AAAI Press (2007). http://www.aaai.org/Papers/AAAI/2007/AAAI07-029.pdf

  3. Lecoutre, C.: STR2: optimized simple tabular reduction for table constraints. Constraints 16(4), 341–371 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10601-011-9107-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bessiere, C.: Constraint propagation. In: Handbook of Constraint Programming, pp. 29–83. Elsevier (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gent, I.P., Jefferson, C., Kelsey, T., Lynce, I., Miguel, I., Nightingale, P., Smith, B.M., Tarim, S.A.: Search in the patience game ‘Black Hole’. AI Communications 20(3), 211–226 (2007). https://content.iospress.com/articles/ai-communications/aic405

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gargani, A., Refalo, P.: An efficient model and strategy for the steel mill slab design problem. In: Bessière, C. (ed.) CP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4741, pp. 77–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74970-7_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Dekker, J.J., Björdal, G., Carlsson, M., Flener, P., Monette, J.N.: Auto-tabling for subproblem presolving in MiniZinc. Constraints 22(4), 512–529 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10601-017-9270-5

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Nethercote, N., Stuckey, P.J., Becket, R., Brand, S., Duck, G.J., Tack, G.: MiniZinc: towards a standard cp modelling language. In: Bessière, C. (ed.) CP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4741, pp. 529–543. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74970-7_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. IBM Knowledge Center: The strong constraint (2017). https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSSA5P_12.8.0/ilog.odms.ide.help/OPL_Studio/opllang_quickref/topics/tlr_oplsch_strong.html

  10. Le Provost, T., Wallace, M.: Domain independent propagation. In: Proceedings of FGCS: International Conference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems, pp. 1004–1011. IOS Press (1992). http://www.webmail.eclipseclp.org/reports/corefgcs.pdf

  11. Nightingale, P., Akgün, Ö., Gent, I.P., Jefferson, C., Miguel, I.: Automatically improving constraint models in Savile Row through associative-commutative common subexpression elimination. In: O’Sullivan, B. (ed.) CP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8656, pp. 590–605. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10428-7_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Nightingale, P., Spracklen, P., Miguel, I.: Automatically improving SAT encoding of constraint problems through common subexpression elimination in savile row. In: Pesant, G. (ed.) CP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9255, pp. 330–340. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23219-5_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Nightingale, P., Akgün, O., Gent, I.P., Jefferson, C., Miguel, I., Spracklen, P.: Automatically improving constraint models in Savile Row. Artif. Intell. 251, 35–61 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2017.07.001

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Nightingale, P., Rendl, A.: Essence’ description (2016). arXiv:1601.02865 [cs.AI]

  15. Bessière, C., Hebrard, E., Hnich, B., Walsh, T.: The complexity of reasoning with global constraints. Constraints 12(2), 239–259 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10601-006-9007-3

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Régin, J.C.: Generalized arc consistency for global cardinality constraint. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1996, pp. 209–215. AAAI Press (1996). http://www.aaai.org/Papers/AAAI/1996/AAAI96-031.pdf

  17. Gent, I.P., Jefferson, C., Miguel, I.: Minion: A fast scalable constraint solver. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2006, pp. 98–102. IOS Press (2006). http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volumearticle/2658

  18. Lecoutre, C., Sais, L., Tabary, S., Vidal, V.: Last conflict based reasoning. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2006, pp. 133–137. IOS Press (2006). http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volumearticle/2665

  19. Chu, G., Stuckey, P.J., Schutt, A., Ehlers, T., Gange, G., Francis, K.: Chuffed (2018). https://github.com/chuffed/chuffed/

  20. Akgün, Ö., Gent, I.P., Jefferson, C., Miguel, I., Nightingale, P., Salamon, A.Z.: Tabulation experimental software and additional results (2018). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1290656, https://github.com/stacs-cp/cp2018-tabulation

  21. Van Hentenryck, P., Michel, L., Perron, L., Régin, J.-C.: Constraint programming in OPL. In: Nadathur, G. (ed.) PPDP 1999. LNCS, vol. 1702, pp. 98–116. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/10704567_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. CSPLib: A problem library for constraints (1999). http://www.csplib.org

  23. Erdos, P., Sárközy, A.: On sets of coprime integers in intervals. Hardy-Ramanujan J. 16, 1–20 (1993). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01108688

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank EPSRC for grants EP/P015638/1 and EP/P026842/1. Dr Jefferson holds a Royal Society University Research Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Nightingale .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Akgün, Ö., Gent, I.P., Jefferson, C., Miguel, I., Nightingale, P., Salamon, A.Z. (2018). Automatic Discovery and Exploitation of Promising Subproblems for Tabulation. In: Hooker, J. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming. CP 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11008. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98334-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98334-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98333-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98334-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics