Skip to main content

Who Are the Policymakers and What Are Their Interests?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Behavioural Policies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention

Abstract

Political actors and their interests are significant to policymaking. The chapter gives an overview of the most relevant political actors in public health. But the context of policymaking goes beyond visible political actors. Hence, in a second step the chapter shows which role scientific expertise plays and in what manner it plays this role. The way in which scientific expertise is produced and applied to policymaking by different actors is extremely important in order to understand agenda-setting, the hierarchy of specific policies in public health and ways of implementing those policies in different contexts. This chapter highlights and explains the high degree of complexity that characterises the relationship between policymakers and epistemic authority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2008). Meta-organizations. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boseley, S. (2003). WHO ‘Infiltrated by food industry’. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/jan/09/foodanddrink. Last accessed 4 Mar 2018.

  • Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policy making. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, J., & Scrinis, G. (2017). Big food, nutritionism, and corporate power. Globalizations, 14(4), 578–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S. (2010). Global politics of health. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demortain, D. (2009). Legitimation by standards: Transnational experts, the European Commission and regulation of novel foods. Sociologie du travail, 51S, e104–e116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., et al. (2003). Science in the modern world polity. Institutionalization and globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fafard, P., & Hoffman, S. (2018). Rethinking knowledge translation for public health policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tpp/ep/pre-prints/content-ppevidpol1700028r3

  • Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy & expertise. Reorienting policy inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. F. (1998). Cultural boundaries of science. Credibility on the line. Chicago/London: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam, C. (2017). Whitewash. The story of a weed killer, cancer, and the corruption of science. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. (2016). Neoliberal science, Chinese style: Making and managing the ‘obesity epidemic’. Social Studies of Science, 46(4), 485–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, H.-U. (2017). Information-domination in the European food industry: Focus on Germany. In G. Steier & K. K. Patel (Eds.), International food law and policy (pp. 3–30). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, B., & Parkhurst, J. (2016). The ‘good governance’ of evidence in health policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 12(4), 575–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickx, K. (2017). Working imagination along the food-drug divide. In G. Verschraegen, F. Vandermoere, L. Braeckmans, et al. (Eds.), Imagined futures in science, technology, and society. Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILSI. (2016a). 2015 Member and Supporting Companies. Available at: http://ilsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Members.pdf. Last accessed 3 Mar 2018.

  • ILSI. (2016b). Code of ethics and organizational standards of conduct. Available at: http://ilsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ILSICodeofEthicsSofC2009.pdf. Last accessed 3 Mar 2018.

  • ILSI. (2016c). The role and activities of ILSI Europe. Available at: http://ilsi.org/europe/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2016/05/ILSI-FREQUENTLY-ASKED-QUESTIONS.pdf. Last accessed 3 Mar 2018.

  • ILSI. (2018a). Mission and operating principles. Available at: http://ilsi.org/about/mission/

  • ILSI. (2018b). Status of the new activity on ‘consumer behaviour determinants’. Available at: http://ilsi.eu/emerging-issues/. Last accessed 3 Mar 2018.

  • Jasanoff, S. (2011). Quality control and peer review in advisory science. In J. Lentsch & P. Weingart (Eds.), The politics of scientific advice. Institutional design for quality assurance (pp. 19–35). Cambridge/New York/Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kickbusch, I. (2003). The contribution of the World Health Organization to a new public health and health promotion. American Journal of Public Health, 93(3), 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M., Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (2010). Governing epidemics in an age of complexity: Narratives, politics and pathways to sustainability. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 369–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. J. (2007). Towards good practice for health statistics: Lessons from the Millennium Development Goal health indicators. The Lancet, 369(9564), 862–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nestle, M. (2002). Food politics: How the food industry influences nutrition and health (Revised ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, K., Innvar, S., Lorenc, T., Woodman, J., & Thomas, J. (2014). A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quack, S. (2016). Expertise and authority in transnational governance. In R. Cotterrell & M. Del Mar (Eds.), Authority in transnational legal theory. Theorising across disciplines. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, H., Savona, N., Glonti, K., Bibby, J., Cummins, S., Finegood, D. T., et al. (2017). The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. The Lancet, 390(10112), 2602–2604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1961). The semisovereign people, A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2012). Knowledge actors and transnational governance: The private-public policy Nexus in the global Agora. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassheim, H. (2015). Politics and policy expertise: Towards a political epistemology. In F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnová, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of critical policy studies (pp. 319–340). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassheim, H. (2017a). Behavioural expertise and regulatory power in Europe. In M. Lee, A. de Ruiter, & M. Weimer (Eds.), Regulating risks in the European Union (pp. 143–163). Oxford: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassheim, H. (2017b). Trends towards evidence-based policy formulation. In M. Howlett & I. Mukherjee (Eds.), Handbook of policy formulation (pp. 504–521). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strassheim, H., & Kettunen, P. (2014). When does evidence-based policy turn into policy-based evidence? Configurations, contexts and mechanisms. Evidence & Policy, 10(2), 259–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vibert, F. (2007). The rise of the unelected: Democracy and the new separation of powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978 [1922]). Economy and society. An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2015 [1917]). Science as a vocation. In P. Lassmann, I. Velody, & H. Martins (Eds.), Max Weber’s ‘Science as a vocation’. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youde, J. R. (2012). Global health governance. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapp, M. (2018). The scientization of the world polity: International organizations and the production of scientific knowledge, 1950–2015. International Sociology, 33(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, M. (2017). From constitutional rule to loosely coupled spheres of liquid authority: A reflexive approach. International Theory, 9(2), 261–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory – A Journal of International Politics, Law and Philosophy, 4(1), 69–106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holger Strassheim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Strassheim, H., Loer, K. (2019). Who Are the Policymakers and What Are Their Interests?. In: Ewert, B., Loer, K. (eds) Behavioural Policies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Palgrave Studies in Public Health Policy Research. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98316-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics