Abstract
For practicing surgeons, maintaining surgical skills and/or acquiring new procedural ability depend on many factors and are accomplished in several ways. Maintenance of certification programs for the American Board of Medical Specialties lays out some of those requirements. None at this point involve demonstration of procedural or technical skill competency in the surgical specialties, though reporting of caseloads, maintaining good standing/privileges at a hospital or health system, and submitting surgical patient cases to an outcomes database are accepted surrogates. Acquiring and performing new procedures are hospital-dependent, based on medical staff bylaws and credentialing policies. Reentering a surgical practice and remediating surgical skills due to specific deficiencies are difficult based on a surgeon’s caseload, the duration of absences from the practice of surgery, and the experience and the circumstances related to absences. While continuing medical education (CME) programs/credit is used for knowledge and skill maintenance, as of 2018, high-stakes procedural skill assessment verifying that practicing surgeons meet minimum criteria to be safe is lacking. While FLS, FES, and the developing FRS and FUSE programs are required for graduating residents to show procedural competency prior to graduation from residency and initial board certification, none are required for maintenance of certification. Studies from military programmed absences, for example, demonstrated that a greater than 6-month absence leads to self-perceived skill decrement. Surgeons are significantly impacted based on the stage of their career development, with junior surgeons likely sustaining the most profound impact due to non-solidification of experience/practice, disruption of the cognitive to technical interface, and a need for surgical skills refinement. For a surgeon to reenter clinical practice, programs need to focus on simulation and mental skills curriculum to bring to baseline technical skills while also developing coping skills and determining the impact of potential external stressors. Programs designed for reentering the surgical workforce should seek to solidify the cognitive to technical skill interface, refine technical skills learned during formal training, and build upon existing surgical skills. A structured and surgeon-specific reentry program focusing on both cognitive and procedural-related skills is necessary, enhanced through inanimate simulation, specific live tissue/cadaveric skills practice/assessment, and cognitive/mental skill scenario training followed by or in parallel to supervised clinical reintegration.
Keywords
None of the authors have any disclosures or conflicts of interest.
All the authors are employees of the Department of Defense, and this study does not represent the views of the Department of Defense or the US Army.
The authors jointly take responsibility for the overall content and integrity of this manuscript.
There was no funding source for this work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Enter DH, Lee R, Fann JI, Hicks GL Jr, Verrier ED, Mark R, et al. “Top gun” competition: motivation and practice narrows the technical skill gap among new cardiothoracic surgery residents. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(3):870–5; discussion 875–6.
O’Connor A, Schwaitzberg SD, Cao CG. How much feedback is necessary for learning to suture? Surg Endosc. 2008;22(7):1614–9.
Cogbill TH. The general surgery milestone project. 2015 [cited 2017]; Available from: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/SurgeryMilestones.pdf.
Quillin RC 3rd, Cortez AR, Pritts TA, Hanseman DJ, Edwards MJ, Davis BR. Operative variability among residents has increased since implementation of the 80-hour workweek. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(6):1201–10.
Drake FT, Horvath KD, Goldin AB, Gow KW. The general surgery chief resident operative experience: 23 years of national ACGME case logs. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(9):841–7.
Gupta N, Dragovic K, Trester R, Blankstein J. The changing scenario of obstetrics and gynecology residency training. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(3):401–6.
Obi A, Chung J, Chen R, Lin W, Sun S, Pozehl W, et al. Achieving Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty hours compliance within advanced surgical training: a simulation-based feasibility assessment. Am J Surg. 2015;210(5):947–50.e1.
Shore EM, Lefebvre GG, Husslein H, Bjerrum F, Sorensen JL, Grantcharov TP. Designing a standardized laparoscopy curriculum for gynecology residents: a delphi approach. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(2):197–202.
Shore EM, Grantcharov TP, Husslein H, Shirreff L, Dedy NJ, McDermott CD, et al. Validating a standardized laparoscopy curriculum for gynecology residents: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:204.e1–e11.
Okrainec A, Soper NJ, Swanstrom LL, Fried GM. Trends and results of the first 5 years of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) certification testing. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1192–8.
Buyske J. The role of simulation in certification. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90(3):619–21.
Yan H, Maximus S, Koopmann M, Keeley J, Smith B, Virgilio C, et al. Vascular trauma operative experience is inadequate in general surgery programs. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;33:94–7.
Kansier N, Varghese TK Jr, Verrier ED, Drake FT, Gow KW. Accreditation council for graduate medical education case log: general surgery resident thoracic surgery experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(2):459–64; discussion 645.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Available from: www.acgme.org.
Dreyfus S, Dreyfus H. A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. Washington D.C.: University of California, Berkley; 1980.
Wong JA, Matsumoto ED. Primer: cognitive motor learning for teaching surgical skill--how are surgical skills taught and assessed? Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008;5(1):47–54.
Hu YY, Parker SH, Lipsitz SR, Arriaga AF, Peyre SE, Corso KA, et al. Surgeons’ leadership styles and team behavior in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(1):41–51.
Hu YY, Peyre SE, Arriaga AF, Osteen RT, Corso KA, Weiser TG, et al. Postgame analysis: using video-based coaching for continuous professional development. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(1):115–24.
Waljee JF, Greenfield LJ, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer JD. Surgeon age and operative mortality in the United States. Ann Surg. 2006;244(3):353–62.
Lee HJ, Drag LL, Bieliauskas LA, Langenecker SA, Graver C, O'Neill J, et al. Results from the cognitive changes and retirement among senior surgeons self-report survey. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(5):668–71.e2.
McDonough PS, Tausch TJ, Peterson AC, Brand TC. Initial validation of the ProMIS surgical simulator as an objective measure of robotic task performance. J Robot Surg. 2011;5(3):195–9.
Blasier RB. The problem of the aging surgeon: when surgeon age becomes a surgical risk factor. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(2):402–11.
Schoenthaler M, Avcil T, Sevcenco S, Nagele U, Hermann TE, Kuehhas FE, et al. Single-Incision Transumbilical Surgery (SITUS) versus Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized comparative study of performance with novices in a dry laboratory. World J Urol. 2015;33(1):51–7.
Fann JI, Feins RH, Hicks GL Jr, Nesbitt JC, Hammon JW, Crawford FA Jr. Evaluation of simulation training in cardiothoracic surgery: the senior tour perspective. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(2):264–72.
Drag LL, Bieliauskas LA, Langenecker SA, Greenfield LJ. Cognitive functioning, retirement status, and age: results from the cognitive changes and retirement among senior surgeons study. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(3):303–7.
Connor EV, Raker C, Wohlrab KJ. Effects of repetition and inactivity on laparoscopic skills training. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(2):194–7.
Deering SH, Rush RM Jr, Lesperance RN, Roth BJ. Perceived effects of deployments on surgeon and physician skills in the US Army medical department. Am J Surg. 2011;201(5):666–72.
Thorson CM, Dubose JJ, Rhee P, Knuth TE, Dorlac WC, Bailey JA, et al. Military trauma training at civilian centers: a decade of advancements. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S483–9.
Tausch TJ, Kowalewski TM, White LW, McDonough PS, Brand TC, Lendvay TS. Content and construct validation of a robotic surgery curriculum using an electromagnetic instrument tracker. J Urol. 2012;188(3):919–23.
Wright AS. Validity in educational research: critically important but frequently misunderstood. Arch Surg. 2010;145(2):201.
Steigerwald SN, Park J, Hardy KM, Gillman L, Vergis AS. Establishing the concurrent validity of general and technique-specific skills assessments in surgical education. Am J Surg. 2016;211(1):268–73.
Deal SBLT, Haque MI, Brand T, Comstock B, Warren J, Alseidi A. Crawd-sourced asessment of technical skills: an oppurtunity for improvment in the assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg. 2015;211:398–404.
Ghani KR, Miller DC, Linsell S, Brachulis A, Lane B, Sarle R, et al. Measuring to improve: peer and crowd-sourced assessments of technical skill with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2016;69(4):547–50.
Kruskal J, Eisenberg R. Focused professional performance evaluation of a radiologist--a centers for medicare and medicaid services and joint commission requirement. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016;45(2):87–93.
Ongoing Professional Practic Evaluation (OPPE)- Intent. The joint commission; Available from: http://jointcommission.org/.
Hunt JL. Assessing physician competency: an update on the joint commission requirement for ongoing and focused professional practice evaluation. Adv Anat Pathol. 2012;19(6):388–400.
Gorrindo T, Goldfarb E, Birnbaum RJ, Chevalier L, Meller B, Alpert J, et al. Simulation-based ongoing professional practice evaluation in psychiatry: a novel tool for performance assessment. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39(7):319–23.
Ehrenfeld JM, Henneman JP, Peterfreund RA, Sheehan TD, Xue F, Spring S, et al. Ongoing professional performance evaluation (OPPE) using automatically captured electronic anesthesia data. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012;38(2):73–80.
Steele JR, Hovsepian DM, Schomer DF. The joint commission practice performance evaluation: a primer for radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(6):425–30.
Catalano EW Jr, Ruby SG, Talbert ML, Knapman DG. College of American Pathologists considerations for the delineation of pathology clinical privileges. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(4):613–8.
Levine AI, Schwartz AD, Bryson EO, Demaria S Jr. Role of simulation in U.S. physician licensure and certification. Mt Sinai J Med. 2012;79(1):140–53.
Pereira BM, Ryan ML, Ogilvie MP, Gomez-Rodriguez JC, McAndrew P, Garcia GD, et al. Predeployment mass casualty and clinical trauma training for US Army forward surgical teams. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(4):982–6.
Siriratsivawong K, Kang J, Riffenburgh R, Hoang TN. Immersion team training in a realistic environment improves team performance in trauma resuscitation. Surgery. 2016;160:586–90.
Pena G, Altree M, Babidge W, Field J, Hewett P, Maddern G. Mobile simulation unit: taking simulation to the surgical trainee. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85(5):339–43.
Kellicut DC, Kuncir EJ, Williamson HM, Masella PC, Nielsen PE. Surgical team assessment training: improving surgical teams during deployment. Am J Surg. 2014;208(2):275–83.
Martinou E, Allan H, Vig S. Personality differences among junior postgraduate trainees in the United Kingdom. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(1):122–7.
Ibrahim EF, Richardson MD, Nestel D. Mental imagery and learning: a qualitative study in orthopaedic trauma surgery. Med Educ. 2015;49(9):888–900.
Sroka G, Arnon Z, Laniado M, Schiff E, Matter I. Hypnosis-induced mental training improves performance on the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) simulator. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(5):1024–9.
Eldred-Evans D, Grange P, Cheang A, Yamamoto H, Ayis S, Mulla M, et al. Using the mind as a simulator: a randomized controlled trial of mental training. J Surg Educ. 2013;70(4):544–51.
Paige JT, Yu Q, Hunt JP, Marr AB, Stuke LE. Thinking it through: mental rehearsal and performance on 2 types of laparoscopic cholecystectomy simulators. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(4):740–8.
Sattelmayer M, Elsig S, Hilfiker R, Baer G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of selected motor learning principles in physiotherapy and medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:15.
Stefanidis D, Anton NE, Howley LD, Bean E, Yurco A, Pimentel ME, Davis CK. Effectiveness of a comprehensive mental skills curriculum in enhancing surgical performance: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2017;213(2):318–24.
Anton NE, Beane J, Yurco AM, Howley LD, Bean E, Myers EM, Stefanidis D. Mental skills training effectively minimizes operative performance deterioration under stressful conditions: results of a randomized controlled study. Am J Surg. 2018;215(2):214–21.
Pluyter JR, Rutkowski AF, Jakimowicz JJ. Immersive training: breaking the bubble and measuring the heat. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(5):1545–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Causey, M.W., Rush, R.M. (2019). Skill Maintenance, Remediation, and Reentry. In: Stefanidis, D., Korndorffer Jr., J., Sweet, R. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Surgery and Surgical Subspecialties. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98276-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98276-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98275-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98276-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)