Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Art of Teaching Nurses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rheumatology Teaching

Abstract

Nursing education has significantly developed in response to the changing needs, advances, priorities and expectations in health and healthcare. Modern nursing education should enable the nurse student/practitioner to acquire the knowledge, skills and behaviour and meet the present and future challenges. Also, nurses should be able to improve health and well-being, drive up standards and quality as well as cover a range of roles including practitioner, educator, leader and researcher. In partnership with the physicians and surgeons, nurses are expected to provide essential care to a very high standard and provide complex care using the best available evidence and technology where appropriate. Management of long-term conditions and the ageing population represents an extra challenge that requires a specialized learning and training. As graduates they must be able to think analytically, use problem-solving approaches and evidence in decision-making, keep up with technical advances and meet future expectations. This chapter will provide a descriptive account of nursing education including a contemporary understanding of the art and science in educating nurses; the modern concept of specialist nursing, using rheumatology specialized nursing as an example; as well as the current change in the anatomy of the clinic visits and the nurses’ educational needs. It will expand to discuss teaching strategies for nurses’ education and current challenges to specialist nursing education and will conclude with a reflection on how future services are likely to be delivered and a vision towards nurses’ education in the year 2030.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hill J. Rheumatology nurse specialists—do we need them? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46:379–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Palmer D, El Miedany Y. Rheumatology helpline: challenges in the biologic therapy era. Br J Nurs. 2011;20(12):728–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Palmer D, El Miedany Y. PROMs: a novel approach to arthritis self-management. Br J Nurs. 2012;21(10):601–2. 605–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Palmer D, El Miedany Y. EROMIA in inflammatory arthritis: the next step in standard practice. Br J Nurs. 2010;19(1):42–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brady T. Strategies to support self-management in osteoarthritis: five categories of interventions, including education. Orthop Nurs. 2012;31:124–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goh L, Samanta J, Samanta A. Rheumatology nurse practitioners’ perceptions of their role. Musculoskelet Care. 2006;4:88–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Swanson KI, Pfenning S. The nurse practitioner's role in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. J Nurs Pract. 2011;7:858–62. 870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Juhola H, Kukkurainen ML, Suominen T. Rheumatology nurses’ work-related empowerment. Musculoskelet Care. 2007;5:91–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. van Eijk-Hustings Y, van Tubergen A, Boström C, EULAR, et al. EULAR recommendations for the role of the nurse in the management of chronic inflammatory arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:13–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schlenk E, Starz T, Levesque M, Baker N, Rogers J. Understanding function in RA: the nurse’s role in patient evaluation. Rheumatology network 2012. http://www.rheumatologynetwork.com/rheumatoid-arthritis/understanding-function-ra-nurses-role-patient-evaluation.

  11. Keele University. Postgraduate diploma/master in rheumatology nursing. http://haywoodrheumatology.org.uk/documents/2011_MSc_Info_Pack.pdf.

  12. Almeida C, Clarke B, O’Brien A, Hammond A, Ryan S, Kay L, Hewlett S. Current provision of rheumatology education for undergraduate nursing, occupational therapy and physiotherapy students in the UK. Rheumatology. 2006;45:868–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nursing and Midwifery Council. Standards of proficiency for preregistration nursing education. London: NMC; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  14. College of Occupational Therapists. Standards for education: pre-registration education standards. London: COT; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. The curriculum framework. London: CSP; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kay L, Deighton C, Walker D, Hay E. Undergraduate rheumatology teaching in the UK: a survey of current practice and changes since 1990. Rheumatology. 2000;39:800–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nolan M, Nolan J. Rehabilitation, chronic illness and disability: the missing elements in nurse education. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29:958–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hill J, Bird H, Lawton C, Harmer R, Wright V. An evaluation of the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of a nurse practitioner in a rheumatology outpatient clinic. Br J Rheumatol. 1994;33:283–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jette AM, Becker MC. Nursing, occupational therapy and physical therapy preparation in rheumatology in the United States and Canada. J Allied Health. 1980;9:268–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Westby MD. Rheumatology instruction in physical therapy undergraduate programs: a survey of Canadian universities. Physiother Can. 1999;51:264–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jones A, Maddison P, Doherty M. Teaching rheumatology to medical students: current practice and future aims. J R Coll Phys. 1992;26:41–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals. Standards of practice. Available at: www.rheumatology.org/arhp/practice/standards. Accessed 22 Feb 2018.

  23. Carr A, Gordon T. Defining the extended clinical role for allied health professionals in rheumatology. ARC Conference Proceedings 12. Chesterfield, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  24. El Miedany Y, Palmer D. Can standard rheumatology clinical practice be patient-based? Br J Nurs. 2008;17(10):673–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Palmer D, El Miedany Y. From guidelines to clinical practice: cardiovascular risk management in inflammatory arthritis patients. Br J Commun Nurs. 2013;18(9):424–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Palmer D, El Miedany Y. Treat-to-target: a tailored treatment approach to rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Nurs. 2013;22(6):308. 310, 312-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stein K, Corte C, Colling K, Whall A. A theoretical analysis of Carper’s ways of knowing using model of social cognition. Sch Inq Nurs Pract Int J. 1998;12:43–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Benner P. From novice to expert: excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley; 1984. p. 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed). University of Chicago Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dickens C, Creed F. The burden of depression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2001;40(12):1327–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sheehy C, Murphy E, Barry M. Depression in RA-underscoring the problem. Editorial Rheumatol. 2006;5(11):1325–7.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Palmer D, El Miedany Y. Self-helplessness in arthritis: an important but overlooked index. Br J Nurs. 2010;19(15):965–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Royal College of Nursing (2002). A charter for rheumatology nursing. Publication number 000 762. http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/78491/000762.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2017.

  34. Hoff R. I can see you naked. Kansas City: Andrews and McMeel; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Professor Mehabrian’s work 1960s. Accessed 24 Feb 2018 at http://www.businessballs.com/mehrabiancommunications.htm.

  37. Xu J-h. Toolbox of teaching strategies in nurse education. Chin Nurs Res. 2016;3:54–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kemp JE, Morrison GR, Ross SM. Developing evaluation instruments. In: Designing effective instruction. New York: MacMillan College Publishing. p. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Morgan RL, Whorton JE, Gunsalus C. A comparison of short term and long term retention: lecture combined with discussion versus. J Instr Psychol. 2000;27:53.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Johnson JP, Mighten A. A comparison of teaching strategies: lecture notes combined with structured group discussion versus lecture only. J Nurs Educ. 2005;44:319e322.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Goodin HJ, Stein D. Deliberative discussion as an innovative teaching strategy. J Nurs Educ. 2008;47:272e274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gomez GE, Gomez EA. Learning of psychomotor skills: laboratory versus patient care setting. J Nurs Educ. 1987;26:20e24.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nagle BM, McHale JM, Alexander GA, French BM. Incorporating scenario-based simulation into a hospital nursing education program. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2009;40:18e25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Reese CE, Jeffries PR, Engum SA. Learning together: using simulations to develop nursing and medical student collaboration. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2010;31:33e37.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kaddoura MA. New graduate nurses’ perceptions of the effects of clinical simulation on their critical thinking, learning, and confidence. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2010;41:506e516.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Smith SJ, Roehrs CJ. High-fidelity simulation: factors correlated with nursing student satisfaction and self-confidence. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009;30:74e78.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Carnegie Mellon University. Innovative teaching strategies; 2006. 2015.10.9. http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/assessment/howto/assesslearning/conceptmaps.html.

  48. All AC, Huycke LI, Fisher MJ. Instructional tools for nursing education: concept maps. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2003;24:311e317.

    Google Scholar 

  49. All AC, Havens RL. Cognitive/concept mapping: a teaching strategy for nursing. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25:1210e1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Harpaz I, Balik C, Ehrenfeld M. Concept mapping: an educational strategy for advancing nursing education. Nurs Forum. 2004;39:27e30. 36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Karaman S, Kucuk S, Aydemir M. Evaluation of an online continuing education program from the perspective of new graduate nurses. Nurse Educ Today. 2014;34:836e841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Masters K. Development and use of an educator-developed community assessment board game. Nurse Educ. 2005;30:189e190.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Glendon K, Ulrich D. Using games as a teaching strategy. J Nurs Educ. 2005;44:338e339.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Royse MA, Newton SE. How gaming is used as an innovative strategy for nursing education. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2007;28:263e267.

    Google Scholar 

  55. University of New Mexico. Teaching and Learning Strategies. 2015.10.9. http://nursing.unm.edu/resources/teaching-and-learning-strategies.html.

  56. Shearer R, Davidhizar R. Educational innovations: using role play to develop cultural competence. J Nurs Educ. 2003;42:273e276.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kodotchigova MA. Role play in teaching culture: six quick steps for classroom implementation. Internet TESL J. 2002;8:10e12.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lai C, Wu C. Using handhelds in a Jigsaw cooperative learning environment. J Comput Assist Learn. 2006;22:284e297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Jigsaw Classroom. The Jigsaw classroom overview. 2015.10.19. https://www.jigsaw.org.

  60. Jigsaw strategy. Pennsylvania State University; 2007. 2015.10.19 https://www.schreyerinstitute.psu.edu/pdf/alex/jigsaw.pdf.

  61. Case Studies. Carnegie Mellon University. 2015.10.19. https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/teach/instructionalstrategies/casestudies.html.

  62. Barkley EF, Cross KP, Major CH. Collaborative learning techniques: a handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hayward L, Cairns M. Physical therapist students’ perceptions of and strategic approaches to case-based instruction: suggestions for curriculum design. J Phys Ther Educ. 1998;12:33e42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Garrett M, Schoener L, Hood L. Debate: a teaching strategy to improve verbal communication and critical-thinking skills. Nurse Educ. 1996;21:37e40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Darby M. Debate: a teaching-learning strategy for developing competence in communication and critical thinking. J Dent Hyg. 2007;81:78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Park C, Kier C, Jugdev K. Debate as a teaching strategy in online education: a case study. Can J Learn Technol. 2011;37:17e20.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Bradshaw MJ, Lowenstein AJ. Innovative teaching strategies in nursing and related health professions. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Problem-based learning. Stanford University; 2001. 2015.10.19 http://web.stanford.edu/dept/CTL/cgibin/docs/newsletter/problem_based_learning.Pdf.

  69. Baker CM. Problem-based learning for nursing: integrating lessons from other disciplines with nursing experiences. J Prof Nurs. 2000;16:258e266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Post J, Deal B, Hermanns M. Implementing of a flipped classroom: nursing students’ perspectives. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2015;5(6):25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Keene K. Blending and flipping distance education. Dist Learn. 2013;10(4):63–9.

    Google Scholar 

  72. DeMaio DN, Oakes CE. Flipping the classroom with screencasts. Radiol Technol. 2014;85(3):340–2. PMid:24395903

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Schwartz TA. Flipping the statistics classroom in nursing education. J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(4):199–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Moorman M. The meaning of visual thinking strategies for nursing students. Humanities. 2015;4:748–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Benner P, Sutphen M, Leonard V, Day L. Educating nurses: a call for radical transformation, vol. 15. Hoboken: Wiley; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Housen A. Eye of the beholder: research, theory and practice. Lisbon: Visual Understanding in Education; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Reilly JM, Ring J, Duke L. Visual thinking strategies: a new role for art in medical education. Fam Med. 2005;37:250–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Frei J, Alvarez SE, Alexander MB. Ways of seeing: using the visual arts in nursing education. J Nurs Educ. 2010;49:672–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Pellico LH, Friedlaender L, Fennie KP. Looking is not seeing: using art to improve observational skills. J Nurs Educ. 2009;48:648–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Inskeep SJ, Lisko SA. Alternative clinical nursing experience in an art gallery. Nurse Educ. 2001;26:117–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Institute of Medicine. The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Sargen M, Hooker RS, Cooper RA. Gaps in the supply of physicians, advance practice nurses, and physician assistants. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(6):991–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Wilson JF. Primary care delivery changes as nonphysician clinicians gain independence. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(8):597–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Aiken LH, Cheung RB, Olds DM. Education policy initiatives to address the nurse shortage in the United States. Health Aff. 2009;28(4):w646–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Buerhaus PI, Staiger DO, Auerbach DI. The future of the nursing workforce in the United States: data, trends, and implications. Boston: Jones and Bartlett; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Hansen-Turton T, Ritter A, Valdez B. Developing alliances: how advanced practice nurses became part of the prescription for Pennsylvania. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2009;10(1):7–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Ritter A, Hansen-Turton T. The primary care paradigm shift: an overview of the state-level legal framework governing nurse practitioner practice, Health Lawyer: National Nursing Centers Consortium. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2008. http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/10207/bitstreams/11855.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  88. Safriet B. State legislative requirements for prescriptive authority for nurses, Specialty Nursing Forum, Park Ridge, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  89. American Medical Association. The AMA scope of practice data series: nurse practitioners. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  90. American Academy of Family Practitioners. Primary health care professionals: a comparison. 2011. http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/media/kits/fp-np.html.

  91. Fitzgerald C, Kantrowitz-Gordon I, Katz J, Hirsch A. Advanced practice nursing education: challenges and strategies. Nurs Res Pract. 2012;12:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  92. El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S, Bahlas S, Almedany S, Ahmed I, Palmer D. Toward electronic health recording: evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures system for remote monitoring of early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(12):2106–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, El Aroussy N, Bahlas S, Hegazi M, Palmer D, Youssef S. Toward electronic health recording: evaluation of electronic patient reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) system for remote monitoring of early systemic lupus patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36(11):2461–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. El Miedany Y. Telehealth and telemedicine: how the digital era is changing standard health care. Smart Homecare Technol TeleHealth. 2017;4:43–51. https://doi.org/10.2147/SHTT.S116009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Amarasingham R, Patzer RE, Huesch M, Nguyen NQ, Xie B. Implementing electronic health care predictive analytics, electronic health care predictive analytics: considerations and challenges. Health Aff. 2014;33:1148e1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Byrne MD, Lang N. Examination of nursing data elements from evidence-based recommendations for clinical decision support. Comput Inf Nurs. 2013;31:605e614.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing, CASN. Nursing informatics: entry-to-practice competencies for registered nurses. Toronto: NLN (Vision Series); 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  98. National League for Nursing. A VISION for changing faculty role: preparing students for the technological world of health care. Washington, DC: NLN (Vision Series); 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Risling T. Educating the nurses of 2025: technology trends of the next decade. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017;22:89–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. van Houwelingen CTM, Moerman AH, Ettema RGA, Kort HSM, Cate OT. Competencies required for nursing telehealth activities: a delphi-study. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;39:50e62.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Roski J, Bo-Linn GW, Andrews TA. Creating value in health care through big data: opportunities and policy implications. Health Aff. 2014;33:1115e1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Luchenski SA, Reed JE, Marston C, Papoutsi C, Majeed A, Bell D. Patient and public views on electronic health records and their uses in the United Kingdom: cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Krist AH. Electronic health record innovations for healthier patients and happier doctors. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28:299e302.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Rodgers MM, Pai VM, Conroy RS. Recent advances in wearable sensors for health monitoring. IEEE Sensors J. 2015;15:3119e3126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Williamson B. Algorithmic skin: health-tracking technologies, personal analytics and the biopedagogies of digitized health and physical education. Sport Educ Soc. 2015;20:133e151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. El Miedany Y. e-Rheumatology: are we ready? Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34(5):831–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Cohen IG, Amarasingham R, Shah A, Xie B, Lo B. The legal and ethical concerns that arise from using complex predictive analytics in health care. Health Aff. 2014;33:1139e1147.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Giardina TD, Menon S, Parrish DE, Sittig DF, Singh H. Patient access to medical records and healthcare outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21:737e741.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Hsieh PJ. Healthcare professionals’ use of health clouds: integrating technology acceptance and status quo bias perspectives. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84:512e523.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Liao PH, Hsu PT, Chu W, Chu WC. Applying artificial intelligence technology to support decision-making in nursing: a case study in Taiwan. Health Inf J. 2015;21:137e148.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Sharts-Hopko NC. The coming revolution in personal care robotics: what does it mean for nurses? Nurs Adm Q. 2014;38:5e12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Sultan N. Reflective thoughts on the potential and challenges of wearable technology for healthcare provision and medical education. Int J Inf Manag. 2015;35:521e526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Kuhn L, Reeves K, Taylor Y, Tapp H, McWilliams A, Gunter A, Cleveland J, Dulin M. Planning for action: the impact of an asthma action plan decision support tool integrated into an electronic health record (EHR) at a large health care system. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28:382e393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Ekstrom A, Kurland L, Farrokhnia N, Castren M, Nordberg M. Forecasting emergency department visits using internet data. Ann Emerg Med. 2015;115;65:436e442.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Grossglauser M, Saner H. Data-driven healthcare: from patterns to actions. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21:14e17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Fernandez-Luque L, Bau T. Health and social media: perfect storm of information. Healthc Inf Res. 2015;21:67e73.

    Google Scholar 

  117. O’Malley AS, Draper K, Gourevitch R, Cross DA, Scholle SH. Electronic health records and support for primary care teamwork. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;22:426e434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Honavar VG. The promise and potential of big data: a case for discovery informatics. Rev Policy Res. 2014;31:326e330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. King’s College London, Darent Valley Hospital, Dartford, Kent, UK

    Yasser El Miedany

  2. Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

    Yasser El Miedany

Authors
  1. Yasser El Miedany
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

El Miedany, Y. (2019). The Art of Teaching Nurses. In: Rheumatology Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98213-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98213-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98212-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98213-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation