Skip to main content

Policy Studies and Regional Public Policy-Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regional Governance and Policy-Making in South America

Abstract

The objective of this chapter is to develop a model for the analysis of regional public policy-making. This model connects the macro-level, which is determined by the structures and the normativity of the respective region, with the micro-level of policy-making, represented by transgovernmental networks. Concepts of policy studies complement regional integration theory and will be used to identify factors that influence these networks. Policy studies traditionally consider the national sphere of public policy-making. Also, approaches for policy-making at the global level have increasingly been developed. Until now, however, a regional level of public policy-making has not yet been theorized. This chapter, therefore, relies on findings of both levels: the national and the global. The analytical dimensions of actors, interests, structures, and ideas are discussed individually in view of the regional level of policy-making. Finally, the analytical model is designed based on the findings for these dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “proceso social tejido alrededor de un tema o cuestión.”

  2. 2.

    “cristalizan o malogran la representatividad, constitucionalidad, publicidad, racionalidad de los gobiernos.”

References

  • Adler, Emanuel, and Peter M. Haas. 1990. Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program. In When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations, ed. Ernst B. Haas, vol. 22, 367–390. Studies in International Political Economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar Villanueva, Luis F. 1992. La Hechura de Las Políticas. Vol. 2. Mexico: Miguel Ángel Porrúa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, Thomas A. 2006. Agenda Setting in Public Policy. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, ed. Frank Fischer, Gerald J. Miller, and Mara S. Sidney, 63–78. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, Geert, Guy Peters, and Koen Verhoest. 2010. The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, Mai’a K. Davis. 2013. Rethinking Epistemic Communities Twenty Years Later. Review of International Studies 39 (1): 137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo, Jorge I., ed. 2007. Ensayos Sobre Politicas Publicas. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. 2015. Ensayos sobre políticas públicas II. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • deLeon, Peter, and Danielle M. Vogenbeck. 2006. The Policy Sciences at the Crossroad. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, ed. Frank Fischer, Gerald J. Miller, and Mara S. Sidney, 3–14. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, Daniel W. 2008. All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Rev. ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Frank. 2006. Deliberative Policy Analysis as Practical Reason: Integrating Empirical and Normative Arguments. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, ed. Frank Fischer, Gerald J. Miller, and Mara S. Sidney, 223–236. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Frank, and John Forester. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Frank, and Herbert Gottweis. 2012. Introduction: The Argumentative Turn Revisited. In The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice, ed. Frank Fischer and Herbert Gottweis, 1–30. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graeme, Currie, Suzana Grubnic, and Ron Hodges. 2011. Leadership in Public Services Networks: Antecedents, Process and Outcome. Public Administration 89 (2): 242–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46 (1): 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzner, Burkart. 1972. Reality Construction in Society. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, Michael, Allan McConnell, and Anthony D. Perl. 2013. Reconciling Streams and Stages: Avoiding Mixed Metaphors in the Characterization of Policy Processes. In APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2300442.

  • Howlett, Michael, Anthony Perl, and M. Ramesh. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles & Policy Subsystems. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, Inge. 2013. Global Public Policy: A Policy in the Making. Accessed July 9, 2015. http://www.icpublicpolicy.org/IMG/pdf/panel73_s1_kaul.pdf.

  • Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1974. Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations. World Politics 27 (1): 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Power and Interdependence. 4th ed. Stoughton: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold D. 1956. The Political Science of Science: An Inquiry into the Possible Reconciliation of Mastery and Freedom. The American Political Science Review 50 (4): 961–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, Giandomenico. 1992. Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, Renate. 1993. Modernization and the Logic of Interorganizational Networks. Knowledge and Policy 6 (1): 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, Dirk. 1995. Die Netzwerkgesellschaft: wirtschaftliche Entwicklung und internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit als Probleme gesellschaftlicher Steuerung. Köln: Weltforum-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Hugh T., and Tansu Demir. 2006. Policy Communities. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, ed. Frank Fischer, Gerald J. Miller, and Mara S. Sidney, 137–148. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira, José Antônio Puppim. 2006. Desafios Do Planejamento Em Políticas Públicas: Diferentes Visões e Práticas. RAP Rio de Janeiro 40 (1): 273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oszlak, Oscar, and Guillermo A. O’Donnell. 1976. Estado y Políticas Estatales En América Latina: Hacia Una Estrategia de Investigación. Buenos Aires: Cedes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallares, Francesc. 1988. Las Políticas Públicas: El Sistema Político En Acción. Revista de Estudios Políticos 62: 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattberg, Philipp. 2013. The Emerging Transnational Policy Sphere: Lessons Learned from the Sustainability Arena. Accessed August 14, 2015. http://www.icpublicpolicy.org/IMG/pdf/panel_73_s2__pattberg.pdf.

  • Peters, Guy. 2013. Individuals, Institutions and Public Policy: Making the Linkages. Accessed June 2, 2015. http://www.icpublicpolicy.org/IMG/pdf/panel_84_s1_peters.pdf.

  • Radaelli, Claudio M. 1999a. The Public Policy of the European Union: Whither Politics of Expertise? Journal of European Public Policy 6: 757–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999b. Technocracy in the European Union. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raustalia, Kal. 2002. The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law. Virginia Journal of International Law Association 43 (1): 1–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, John Gerard. 2004. Reconstituting the Global Public Domain—Issues, Actors, and Practices. European Journal of International Relations 10 (4): 499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlappa, Hans, and Yasmin Imani. 2013. Leadership in the Co-Production of Public Services: An Initial Conceptual Framework. Accessed October 17, 2015. http://www.icpublicpolicy.org/IMG/pdf/panel_43_h_schlappa_y_imani.pdf.

  • Schmidt, Vivian A. 2012. Discursive Institutionalism: Scope, Dynamics, and Philosophical Underpinnings. In The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice, ed. Frank Fischer and Herbert Gottweis, 85–113. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2009. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza, Celina. 2006. Políticas Públicas: Uma Revisão Da Literatura. Sociologias 8: 20–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Diane. 2013. Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance: The Private-Public Policy Nexus in the Global Agora. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, Jacob. 2012. Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Velasco, Javier Torres. 2015. Prefacio. In Ensayos sobre políticas públicas II, ed. Jorge Iván Cuervo Restrepo, 9–15. Bogotá: U. Externado de Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Peter. 2006. Public Policy, Social Science, and the State: An Historical Perspective. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, ed. Frank Fischer, Gerald J. Miller, and Mara S. Sidney, 29–40. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weible, Christopher M., and Paul A. Sabatier. 2006. A Guide to Advocacy Coalition Framework. In Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, ed. Frank Fischer, Gerald J. Miller, and Mara S. Sidney, 123–136. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, Sheldon S. 1960. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Boston: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, Dvora. 2000. Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis. Qualitative Research Methods. Beverly Hills, CA [u.a.], 1986–47. Thousand Oaks, CA [u.a.]: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hoffmann, A.M. (2019). Policy Studies and Regional Public Policy-Making. In: Regional Governance and Policy-Making in South America. Governance, Development, and Social Inclusion in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98068-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics