Abstract
People tend to make poor decisions under stress, in ways inconsistent with traditional economics. Why? A new subfield of research, called behavioural economics, has great relevance for the conflict studies community. Issues such as insecurity, gatekeeper perceptions, and costly information, however, make conducting such research difficult and prone to biases in favour of more urban and stable areas. This chapter makes the argument that nonetheless, such research can and should be attempted.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Stathis N. Kalyvas. The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2006).
- 2.
Depends on the partaker.
- 3.
Ibid., 42.
- 4.
Kat Nickerson. 2013. “Allied Democratic Forces Take Charge in Eastern DRC: Why This? Why Now?” Kat”s Africa [Blog]. Available at: https://katsafrica.wordpress.com/tag/eastern-congo/. Accessed July 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith-Omomo, J. (2019). Introduction. In: African Indigenous Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98011-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98011-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98010-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98011-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)