Skip to main content

From Complementarity to Semiosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Biosemiotic Ontology

Part of the book series: Biosemiotics ((BSEM,volume 18))

  • 383 Accesses

Abstract

Giorgio Prodi poses a fundamental philosophical problem: how was the emergence of immaterial meaning possible within the world of material things? In order to answer this question, Prodi develops an original relational ontology. The world is made of relations between things, not of things. The world is relation; semiosis is relation: it follows that the world itself is semiosis. This chapter will expose Prodi’s natural history of meaning.

In our view, it is not symbolic language which “explains” the machinery of the cell, but it is this machinery that must explain (through a suitable complexity) the nature of a symbolic language.

(Prodi 2010: 334)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In later years (see particularly Eco 1999, Chap. 2), Eco will relax his critique to the notion of “referent”, although without fully changing his mind regarding the concepts of iconicity and semiosis.

  2. 2.

    The empirical question is highly controversial, and a much hangs on just how stringent the criteria to define a behaviour as a “lie” are taken to be (see, e.g. Gómez and Martín-Andrade 2002).

  3. 3.

    Prodi here is probably thinking about Wilson’s (1978) sociobiology. His La storia naturale della logica was published only 4 years later: “to think that human behaviour can be deduced from animal behaviour, as believed by much of experimental psychology and sociobiology, is conceptually erroneous. The animal model is certainly useful, but inadequate. The human psyche was built in a very peculiar manner, precisely thanks to its intimate mingling and merging with logico-discursive functions” (Prodi 1987: 61).

BibliographyIn ItalianOther Works Cited

  • Alač, M., & Violi, P. (Eds.). (2004). In the beginning: Origins of semiosis, Semiotic and Cognitive Studies 12. Bologna: Brepols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M. (1985). La teoria semantica dell’evoluzione. (Thom, René, preface.) (Saggi, Scienze.) Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M. (2000). I codici organici: La nascita della biologia semantica. (Capire la vita 1.) Ancona: peQuod editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M. (2001). The organic codes: The birth of semantic biology. (Capire la vita 2.) Ancona: peQuod editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardini, T. (2017). Relational ontology, Simondon, and the hope for a third culture inside biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 10(1), 131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimatti, F. (2000b). The circular semiosis of Giorgio Prodi. Sign Systems Studies, 28, 351–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobley, P. (2016). Cultural Implications of Biosemiotics, Biosemiotics 15. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1988b). Una sfida al mito delle due culture. In: Saecularia nona, 2. [In English, Eco 1994.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1999 [1997]). Kant and the platypus: Essays on language and cognition. (A. McEwen, Trans.). San Diego: A Harvest Book, Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florkin, M. (1974). Concepts of molecular biosemiotics and of molecular evolution. Comprehensive Biochemistry, 29A, 1–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianfranco, M., & Mangano, D. (Eds.). (2018). Semiotics of animals in culture: Zoosemiotics 2.0, Biosemiotics 17. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, K. (2015). Semiosis stems from logical incompatibility in organic nature: Why biophysics does not see meaning, while biosemiotics does. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 119(3), 616–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, N., Bernhard, T., Larson, B. C., Robinson, A., & Southgate, C. (2014). Empirical demonstration of environmental sensing in catalytic RNA: evolution of interpretive behavior at the origins of life. BioMed Central Evolutionary Biology, 14, 248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrilli, S., & Ponzio, A. (2005). Semiotics unbounded: Interpretive routes through the open network of signs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prodi, G. (1983). Linguistica e biologia. In C. Segre (Ed.), Intorno alla linguistica (pp. 172–202). Milano: Feltrinelli (Discussione su “Linguistica e biologia”, 308–319).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodi, G. (1988d). La cultura come ermeneutica naturale. Intersezioni, Rivista di storia delle idee (Bologna: Società Editrice Il Mulino) 8(1): 23–48. [English translation in Prodi 1989b]

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodi, G. (1988e). La biologia come semiotica naturale. In M. Herzfeld & L. Melazzo (Eds.), Semiotic theory and practice: Proceedings of the third international congress of the IASS Palermo, 1984 (Vol. 2, pp. 929–951). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodi, G. (1989b). Culture as natural hermeneutics. In W. A. Koch (Ed.), The nature of culture. Proceedings of the international and interdisciplinary symposium, October 7—11, 1986 in Bochum, Bochum Publications in Evolutionary Cultural Semiotics; BPX 12 (pp. 215–239). Bochum: Studienverlag Dr. Norbert Brockmeyer [Translation of Prodi 1988d].

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1997b). Foreword. In R. Capozzi (Ed.), Reading Eco: An anthology (pp. xi–xvi). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1998). The Estonian connection. Sign Systems Studies, 26, 20–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharov, A., & Vehkavaara, T. (2015). Protosemiosis: Agency with reduced representation capacity. Biosemiotics, 8(1), 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prodi, G. (1979). Orizzonti della genetica. Milano: Espresso Strumenti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodi, G. (1988c). La cultura come ermeneutica naturale. Intersezioni, VIII, 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodi, G. (2010b). Signs and codes in immunology. In D. Favareau (Ed.), Essential readings in biosemiotics: Anthology and commentary (pp. 323–336). Berlin: Springer (originariamente apparso in: Sercar E ed. The semiotics of cellular communication in the immune system, NATO ASI Series H, Cell Biology. Heidelberg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, M. (2014). From biosemiotics to code biology. Biological Theory, 9(2), 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, E. (1971). Problems in general linguistics. Miami: Miami University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, B. (2008). Onto-Ethologies. The animal environments of Uexküll, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Deleuze. New York: Suny Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (2009). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouts, R. (1997). Next of kin. New York: A Living Planet Press Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galef, B. (1988). Imitation in animals: History, definition, and interpretation of data from the psychological laboratory. In T. Zentall & B. Galef (Eds.), Social learning: Psychological and biological perspectives (pp. 3–28). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cimatti, F. (2018). From Complementarity to Semiosis. In: A Biosemiotic Ontology . Biosemiotics, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97903-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics