Skip to main content

The Ontic–Ontological Aspects of Social Life. Edith Stein’s Approach to the Problem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women Phenomenologists on Social Ontology

Part of the book series: Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences ((WHPS,volume 1))

  • 372 Accesses

Abstract

The issue of empathy has become one of the central fields of investigation in phenomenology .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cf. The most important current literature on this topic: Zahavi (2010, 2011, 2014), Szanto (2015), Lebech and Gurmin (2015), Rieß (2010), Yu (2010), Beckmann-Zöller (2006), Hackermeyer (2008); etc.

  2. 2.

    Cf. Stein (1989). Here and in all quotations I refer to the English translations of the Edith Stein editions.

  3. 3.

    Cf. Zahavi (2014).

  4. 4.

    Zahavi (2014, 101).

  5. 5.

    Cf. Zahavi (2014, 13, 55–58, 204), etc.

  6. 6.

    Cf. Husserl (1977).

  7. 7.

    Cf. Stein (2000a).

  8. 8.

    Dilthey (1923).

  9. 9.

    Dilthey (1927).

  10. 10.

    To Edith Stein ’s contribution to Dilthey see also Jani (2015a, b).

  11. 11.

    Cf. Dilthey (1923). Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften, GSch I., 95.

  12. 12.

    Cf. Lessing (2001, 110).

  13. 13.

    Stein (2000b).

  14. 14.

    Cf. Stein (1989, 95): “As natural things have an essential underlying structure, such as the fact that empirical spatial forms are realizations of ideal geometric forms, so there is also an essential structure of the spirit and of ideal types. Historical personalities are empirical realizations of these types. If empathy is the perceptual consciousness in which foreign persons come to givenness for us, then it is also the exemplary basis for obtaining this ideal type , just as natural perception is the basis for the eidetic knowledge of nature”.

  15. 15.

    Zahavi (2014, 81).

  16. 16.

    Cf. Stein (2000a, chap. II).

  17. 17.

    Cf. Stein (1989, 117).

  18. 18.

    Stein (2000b, 197).

  19. 19.

    Szanto (2015, 510).

  20. 20.

    Ibid. 511.

  21. 21.

    Stein (2000b, 201).

  22. 22.

    Ibid. 202.

  23. 23.

    Ibid. 203.

  24. 24.

    Cf. Szanto (2015, 522): “With this in mind, consider first the membership misidentification problem. With individual -to-group and intragroup—or social empathy —and group to member—or collective empathy—properly functioning various misidentifications concerning experiential or emotional sharing might be corrected”.

  25. 25.

    Ibid. 507.

  26. 26.

    Stein (2000b, 204).

  27. 27.

    Zahavi (2014, 64): “The retentional process consequently not only enables us to experience an enduring temporal object; it does not merely enable the constitution of the identity of an object in a manifold of temporal phases; it also provides us with a non-observational, pre-reflective, temporally extended self-consciousness . This is why Husserl ’s account of the structure of inner time-consciousness (pretention-primal impression-protention) must be understood as an analysis of the (micro)-structure of first-personal givenness”.

  28. 28.

    Cf. Stein (2000a, 205).

  29. 29.

    Ibid.

  30. 30.

    Ibid. 207.

  31. 31.

    Szanto (2015, 507).

  32. 32.

    Stein (2000a, 209).

  33. 33.

    Cf. Stein (1989): III/§4a, The Givenness of the Living Body.

  34. 34.

    Cf. Stein On the Problem of Empathy , III/§5d. The Foreign Living Body as the Center of Orientation of the Spatial World 61.

  35. 35.

    Zahavi (2014, 126).

  36. 36.

    Cf. Stein (1989, 62): “A sensing subject has become one which carries out acts”.

  37. 37.

    Stein (2000a, 210).

  38. 38.

    Cf. Stein (1989, 109): “As my own person is constituted in primordial spiritual acts, so the foreign person is constituted in empathically experienced acts. I experience his every action as proceeding from a will and this in turn, from a feeling . Simultaneously with this, I am given a level of his person and a range of values in principle experienceable by him. This, in turn, meaningfully motivates the expectation of future possible volitions and actions”.

  39. 39.

    Stein (2000b, 212).

  40. 40.

    Ibid. 227.

  41. 41.

    See Foot note (40).

  42. 42.

    Stein (2000b, 231).

  43. 43.

    Cf. Stein (1989): IV/§7b, Personal Types and the Condition of the Possibility of Empathy with Persons.

  44. 44.

    Stein (2000a, 273).

  45. 45.

    Cf. Szanto (2015, 507).

  46. 46.

    Cf. Stein (2000b, 208).

  47. 47.

    Cf. Zahavi (2014, 55).

  48. 48.

    Stein (2000b, 290).

Bibliography

  • Beckmann-Zöller, Beate. 2006. Die Unbekannte Edith Stein: Phänomenologie und Sozialphilosophie. Oxford, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Wien: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1923. Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften. Versuch einer Grundlegung für das Studium der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte. GSch I. [Introduction to the Human Sciences. Attempt at a Ground-Laying for the Study of Society and of History]. Gerhard Groethysen (ed.), Kornwestheim: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1927. Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften. GSch. VII. [The construction of the historical World in the human sciences]. Gerhard Groethysen (ed.), Kornwestheim: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackermeyer, Margaretha. 2008. Einfühlung und Leiblichkeit als Voraussetzung für die intersubjektive Konstitution: zum Begriff der Einfühlung bei Edith Stein und seine Rezeption durch Edmund Husserl, Max Scheler, Martin Heidegger, Maurice Merleau-Ponty und Bernhard Waldenfels. Hamburg: Kovac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1977. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Hua III.1. [Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology]. Karl Schumann (ed.), Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jani, Anna. 2015a. Von der Welterfahrung zur geistigen Welt. Die Spuren Edith Steins Dilthey-Rezeption in den frühen Schriften. In Edith Stein Jahrbuch 2015. Würzburg: Echter, 194–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jani, Anna. 2015b. Individuality and Community. The Construction of the Sociality in the Early Phenomenology of Edith Stein. In Philobiblon vol. XX/1, 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebech, Mette, Gurmin, John Hydn. 2015. Intersubjectivity, Humanity, Being: Edith Stein’s Phenomenology and Christian Philosophy. Oxford, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Wien: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessing, Hans Ulrich. 2001. Wilhelm Dilthey’sEinleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften”. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieß, Wolfgang. 2010. Der Weg vom Ich zum Anderen: die philosophische Begründung einer Theorie von Individuum, Gemeinschaft und Staat bei Edith Stein. Dresden: Thelem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Edith. 1989. On the Problem of Empathy. Transl. W. Stein, Washington. D.C.: ICS Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Edith. 2000a. Philosophy of Psychology and the Humanities, Transl. M. C. Baseheart and M. Sawicki, Washington. D.C.: ICS Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Edith. 2000b. Selbstbildnis in Briefen I. 1916 bis 1933. Edith-Stein-Gesamtausgabe vol. 2. Wien, Basel, Köln: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szanto, Thomas. 2015. Collective Emotions, Normativity and Empathy: A Steinian Account. In Human Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-015-9350-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Xin. 2010. Edith Stein and Max Scheler on Einfühlung and Einsfühlung. Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falkovitz and René Kaufmann (eds.), Europa und seine Anderen. Dresden: Thelem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, Dan. 2010. Empathy, embodiment and interpersonal understanding: From Lipps to Schutz. In Inquiry, 53(3), 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, Dan. 2011. Empathy and direct social perception: A phenomenological proposal. In Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2(3), 541–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, Dan. 2014. Self and other: Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Jani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jani, A. (2018). The Ontic–Ontological Aspects of Social Life. Edith Stein’s Approach to the Problem. In: Luft, S., Hagengruber, R. (eds) Women Phenomenologists on Social Ontology. Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97861-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics