Abstract
The issue of empathy has become one of the central fields of investigation in phenomenology .
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Cf. Stein (1989). Here and in all quotations I refer to the English translations of the Edith Stein editions.
- 3.
Cf. Zahavi (2014).
- 4.
Zahavi (2014, 101).
- 5.
Cf. Zahavi (2014, 13, 55–58, 204), etc.
- 6.
Cf. Husserl (1977).
- 7.
Cf. Stein (2000a).
- 8.
Dilthey (1923).
- 9.
Dilthey (1927).
- 10.
- 11.
Cf. Dilthey (1923). Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften, GSch I., 95.
- 12.
Cf. Lessing (2001, 110).
- 13.
Stein (2000b).
- 14.
Cf. Stein (1989, 95): “As natural things have an essential underlying structure, such as the fact that empirical spatial forms are realizations of ideal geometric forms, so there is also an essential structure of the spirit and of ideal types. Historical personalities are empirical realizations of these types. If empathy is the perceptual consciousness in which foreign persons come to givenness for us, then it is also the exemplary basis for obtaining this ideal type , just as natural perception is the basis for the eidetic knowledge of nature”.
- 15.
Zahavi (2014, 81).
- 16.
Cf. Stein (2000a, chap. II).
- 17.
Cf. Stein (1989, 117).
- 18.
Stein (2000b, 197).
- 19.
Szanto (2015, 510).
- 20.
Ibid. 511.
- 21.
Stein (2000b, 201).
- 22.
Ibid. 202.
- 23.
Ibid. 203.
- 24.
Cf. Szanto (2015, 522): “With this in mind, consider first the membership misidentification problem. With individual -to-group and intragroup—or social empathy —and group to member—or collective empathy—properly functioning various misidentifications concerning experiential or emotional sharing might be corrected”.
- 25.
Ibid. 507.
- 26.
Stein (2000b, 204).
- 27.
Zahavi (2014, 64): “The retentional process consequently not only enables us to experience an enduring temporal object; it does not merely enable the constitution of the identity of an object in a manifold of temporal phases; it also provides us with a non-observational, pre-reflective, temporally extended self-consciousness . This is why Husserl ’s account of the structure of inner time-consciousness (pretention-primal impression-protention) must be understood as an analysis of the (micro)-structure of first-personal givenness”.
- 28.
Cf. Stein (2000a, 205).
- 29.
Ibid.
- 30.
Ibid. 207.
- 31.
Szanto (2015, 507).
- 32.
Stein (2000a, 209).
- 33.
Cf. Stein (1989): III/§4a, The Givenness of the Living Body.
- 34.
Cf. Stein On the Problem of Empathy , III/§5d. The Foreign Living Body as the Center of Orientation of the Spatial World 61.
- 35.
Zahavi (2014, 126).
- 36.
Cf. Stein (1989, 62): “A sensing subject has become one which carries out acts”.
- 37.
Stein (2000a, 210).
- 38.
Cf. Stein (1989, 109): “As my own person is constituted in primordial spiritual acts, so the foreign person is constituted in empathically experienced acts. I experience his every action as proceeding from a will and this in turn, from a feeling . Simultaneously with this, I am given a level of his person and a range of values in principle experienceable by him. This, in turn, meaningfully motivates the expectation of future possible volitions and actions”.
- 39.
Stein (2000b, 212).
- 40.
Ibid. 227.
- 41.
See Foot note (40).
- 42.
Stein (2000b, 231).
- 43.
Cf. Stein (1989): IV/§7b, Personal Types and the Condition of the Possibility of Empathy with Persons.
- 44.
Stein (2000a, 273).
- 45.
Cf. Szanto (2015, 507).
- 46.
Cf. Stein (2000b, 208).
- 47.
Cf. Zahavi (2014, 55).
- 48.
Stein (2000b, 290).
Bibliography
Beckmann-Zöller, Beate. 2006. Die Unbekannte Edith Stein: Phänomenologie und Sozialphilosophie. Oxford, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Wien: Peter Lang.
Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1923. Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften. Versuch einer Grundlegung für das Studium der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte. GSch I. [Introduction to the Human Sciences. Attempt at a Ground-Laying for the Study of Society and of History]. Gerhard Groethysen (ed.), Kornwestheim: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1927. Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften. GSch. VII. [The construction of the historical World in the human sciences]. Gerhard Groethysen (ed.), Kornwestheim: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Hackermeyer, Margaretha. 2008. Einfühlung und Leiblichkeit als Voraussetzung für die intersubjektive Konstitution: zum Begriff der Einfühlung bei Edith Stein und seine Rezeption durch Edmund Husserl, Max Scheler, Martin Heidegger, Maurice Merleau-Ponty und Bernhard Waldenfels. Hamburg: Kovac.
Husserl, Edmund. 1977. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Hua III.1. [Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology]. Karl Schumann (ed.), Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Jani, Anna. 2015a. Von der Welterfahrung zur geistigen Welt. Die Spuren Edith Steins Dilthey-Rezeption in den frühen Schriften. In Edith Stein Jahrbuch 2015. Würzburg: Echter, 194–219.
Jani, Anna. 2015b. Individuality and Community. The Construction of the Sociality in the Early Phenomenology of Edith Stein. In Philobiblon vol. XX/1, 19–33.
Lebech, Mette, Gurmin, John Hydn. 2015. Intersubjectivity, Humanity, Being: Edith Stein’s Phenomenology and Christian Philosophy. Oxford, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Wien: Peter Lang.
Lessing, Hans Ulrich. 2001. Wilhelm Dilthey’s “Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften”. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Rieß, Wolfgang. 2010. Der Weg vom Ich zum Anderen: die philosophische Begründung einer Theorie von Individuum, Gemeinschaft und Staat bei Edith Stein. Dresden: Thelem.
Stein, Edith. 1989. On the Problem of Empathy. Transl. W. Stein, Washington. D.C.: ICS Publication.
Stein, Edith. 2000a. Philosophy of Psychology and the Humanities, Transl. M. C. Baseheart and M. Sawicki, Washington. D.C.: ICS Publication.
Stein, Edith. 2000b. Selbstbildnis in Briefen I. 1916 bis 1933. Edith-Stein-Gesamtausgabe vol. 2. Wien, Basel, Köln: Herder.
Szanto, Thomas. 2015. Collective Emotions, Normativity and Empathy: A Steinian Account. In Human Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-015-9350-8.
Yu, Xin. 2010. Edith Stein and Max Scheler on Einfühlung and Einsfühlung. Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falkovitz and René Kaufmann (eds.), Europa und seine Anderen. Dresden: Thelem.
Zahavi, Dan. 2010. Empathy, embodiment and interpersonal understanding: From Lipps to Schutz. In Inquiry, 53(3), 285–306.
Zahavi, Dan. 2011. Empathy and direct social perception: A phenomenological proposal. In Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2(3), 541–558.
Zahavi, Dan. 2014. Self and other: Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jani, A. (2018). The Ontic–Ontological Aspects of Social Life. Edith Stein’s Approach to the Problem. In: Luft, S., Hagengruber, R. (eds) Women Phenomenologists on Social Ontology. Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97861-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97861-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97860-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97861-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)