Skip to main content
  • 559 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we study the universal rigidity problem of bar frameworks and the related problem of dimensional rigidity. The main tools in tackling these two problems are the Cayley configuration spectrahedron \(\mathcal{F}\), defined in (8.10), and Ω, the stress matrix, defined in (8.13). The more general problem of universally linked pair of nonadjacent nodes is also studied and the results are interpreted in terms of the Strong Arnold Property and the notion of nondegeneracy in semidefinite programming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Affine motions are often defined without the nonsingularity assumption on A. However, this assumption is more convenient for our purposes.

References

  1. A.Y. Alfakih, On dimensional rigidity of bar-and-joint frameworks. Discret. Appl. Math. 155, 1244–1253 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. A.Y. Alfakih, On the universal rigidity of generic bar frameworks. Contrib. Discret. Math. 5, 7–17 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. A.Y. Alfakih, On stress matrices of chordal bar frameworks in general positions, 2012. arXiv/1205.3990

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.Y. Alfakih, Universal rigidity of bar frameworks in general position: a Euclidean distance matrix approach, in Distance Geometry: Theory, Methods, and Applications, ed. by A. Mucherino, C. Lavor, L. Liberti, N. Maculan (Springer, Berlin, 2013), pp. 3–22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. A.Y. Alfakih, On Farkas lemma and dimensional rigidity of bar frameworks. Linear Algebra Appl. 486, 504–522 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. A.Y. Alfakih, Universal rigidity of bar frameworks via the geometry of spectrahedra. J. Glob. Optim. 67, 909–924 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. A.Y. Alfakih, V.-H. Nyugen, On affine motions and universal rigidity of tensegrity frameworks. Linear Algebra Appl. 439, 3134–3147 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. A.Y. Alfakih, Y. Ye, On affine motions and bar frameworks in general positions. Linear Algebra Appl. 438, 31–36 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. A.Y. Alfakih, N. Taheri, Y. Ye, On stress matrices of (d + 1)-lateration frameworks in general position. Math. Program. 137, 1–17 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Alizadeh, J.A. Haeberly, M.L. Overton, Complementarity and nondegeneracy in semidefinite programming. Math. Program. Ser. B 77, 111–128 (1997)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. L.W. Beineke, R.E. Pippert, The number of labeled k-dimensional trees. J. Combin. Theory 6, 200–205 (1969)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Colin De Verdière, Sur un nouvel invariant des graphes et un critère de planarité. J. Combin. Theory Ser B 50, 11–21 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Connelly, Rigidity and energy. Invent. Math. 66, 11–33 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Connelly, Tensegrity structures: why are they stable? in Rigidity Theory and Applications, ed. by M.F. Thorpe, P.M. Duxbury (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 1999), pp. 47–54

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Connelly, Generic global rigidity. Discret. Comput. Geom. 33, 549–563 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Connelly, S. Gortler, Iterative universal rigidity. Discret. Comput. Geom. 53, 847–877 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Connelly, S. Gortler, Universal rigidity of complete bipartite graphs. Discret. Comput. Geom. 57, 281–304 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. S.J. Gortler, D.P. Thurston, Characterizing the universal rigidity of generic frameworks. Discret. Comput. Geom. 51, 1017–1036 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. T. Jordán, V.-H. Nguyen, On universal rigid frameworks on the line. Contrib. Discret. Math. 10, 10–21 (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Laurent, A. Varvitsiotis, Positive semidefinite matrix completion, universal rigidity and the strong Arnold property. Linear Algebra Appl. 452, 292–317 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Lovász, Geometric representations of graphs. Unpublished lecture notes, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  22. A.M.-C. So, Semidefinite Programming Approach to the Graph Realization Problem: Theory, Applications and Extensions. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  23. A.M.-C. So, Y. Ye, Theory of semidefinite programming for sensor network localization. Math. Prog. Ser. B 109, 367–384 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Z. Zhu, A.M.-C. So, Y. Ye, Universal rigidity: towards accurate and efficient localization of wireless networks, in Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alfakih, A.Y. (2018). Universal and Dimensional Rigidities. In: Euclidean Distance Matrices and Their Applications in Rigidity Theory. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97846-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics