Abstract
Today’s societies are challenged by the increasing costs of healthcare and global inequality in the availability, accessibility, appropriateness and affordability of medical technologies. There are ways to improve equality and efficiency and decrease costs in this area without fundamentally changing current health systems and business models. Many services and products are experiencing a paradigm shift toward an open source economic model that can be extended to medical technologies in a way that will intrinsically promote sustainable growth and innovations while improving education and global health. This new way of thinking offers an infrastructure by which some sectors of global health can be democratized. Here we present an in-depth discussion of the advantages of open source medical technology for the public and private sectors, then provide a concrete example of the progress of our efforts to develop an open source magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Based on our calculations such an instrument could potentially result in cost savings of up to $3.3 billion within about 20 years for the German healthcare system alone. On a global scale the implications of an affordable open source MRI would be even more striking. We suggest a series of milestones to be met to a widespread development of open source medical technology with the aim of improving global health in a way that is less restricted by current political and economic borders.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arndt, F., Aussenhofer, S., Behrens, E., Blücher, C., Blümler, P., Brand, J., et al. (2017). Open source imaging initiative (OSI2) – Update and roadmap. Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature News, 533(7604), 452 https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a.
Black Duck Software. (n.d.). The tenth annual future of open source survey. Retrieved December 18, 2017, from https://www.blackducksoftware.com/2016-future-of-open-source
Blücher, C., Han, H., Hoffmann, W., Seemann, R., Seifert, F., Niendorf, T., et al. (2017). COSI transmit: Open source soft- and hardware transmission system for traditional and rotating MR. Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 184.
Cooley, C. Z., Stockmann, J. P., Armstrong, B. D., Sarracanie, M., Lev, M. H., Rosen, M. S., et al. (2015). Two-dimensional imaging in a lightweight portable MRI scanner without gradient coils. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 73(2), 872–883.
echOpen. (n.d.). echOpen project – Designing an open source and low-cost echo-stethoscope. Retrieved October 11, 2017, from http://echopen.org
Ejbjerg, B. J., Narvestad, E., Jacobsen, S., Thomsen, H. S., & Østergaard, M. (2005). Optimised, low cost, low field dedicated extremity MRI is highly specific and sensitive for synovitis and bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist and finger joints: Comparison with conventional high field MRI and radiography. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 64(9), 1280–1287.
Ettinger, K. M. (2015). Open issues and a proposal for open-source data monitoring to assure quality, reliability, and safety in health care devices targeting low-and middle-income countries. In Technologies for Development (pp. 81–90). Cham: Springer.
Ettinger, K. M., Pharaoh, H., Buckman, R. Y., Conradie, H., & Karlen, W. (2016). Building quality mHealth for low resource settings. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 40(7–8), 431–443.
European Commission. (n.d.). Guidance – Growth – European Commission. Retrieved October 11, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/medical-devices/guidance_en
Gibb, A. (2014). Building open source hardware: DIY manufacturing for hackers and makers. London: Pearson Education.
Günyar, S. (2017, July 24). Wirtschaftliche Bewertung von Open Source Hardware am Beispiel eines Magnetresonanztomographen. Hamburg: HWI Hamburg.
Halbach, K. (1980). Design of permanent multipole magnets with oriented rare earth cobalt material. Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 169(1), 1–10.
Huang, A. b. (2015, March 31). The death of Moore’s law will spur innovation. Retrieved November 17, 2017, from https://spectrum.ieee.org/semiconductors/design/the-death-of-moores-law-will-spur-innovation
IBM. (2017, April 25). HPC in oil & gas record set today! [CTB10]. Retrieved October 11, 2017, from https://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/52164.wss
Jansen, P. (n.d.). openct|the Tricorder project. Retrieved December 18, 2017, from http://www.tricorderproject.org/blog/tag/openct
Jones, R., Haufe, P., Sells, E., Iravani, P., Olliver, V., Palmer, C., et al. (2011). RepRap – The replicating rapid prototyper. Robotica, 29(1), 177–191 https://doi.org/10.1017/S026357471000069X.
Kersting-Sommerhoff, B., Hof, N., Lenz, M., & Gerhardt, P. (1996). MRI of peripheral joints with a low-field dedicated system: A reliable and cost-effective alternative to high-field units? European Radiology, 6(4), 561–565.
Moritz, M., Redlich, T., Grames, P. P., Wulfsberg, J. P. (2016). Value creation in open-source hardware communities: Case study of Open Source Ecology. In: Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 2016 Portland International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 2368–2375
OpenBCI. (n.d.). OpenBCI – Open Source Biosensing Tools (EEG, EMG, EKG, and more). Retrieved December 18, 2017, from http://openbci.com
OpenPOWER Foundation. (n.d.). OpenPOWER Foundation. Retrieved October 11, 2017, from https://openpowerfoundation.org
Open Innovation Open Science Open to the World – a vision for Europe. (2016). Publications Office European Union.
Open Source Imaging. (n.d.). Open Source Imaging – Open source soft- and hardware research and development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and other related medical devices. Retrieved October 11, 2017, from http://www.opensourceimaging.org
OSHWA. (2012, May 26). Open Source Hardware Association. Retrieved November 21, 2017, from https://www.oshwa.org/definition
Pääkkö, E., Reinikainen, H., Lindholm, E.-L., & Rissanen, T. (2005). Low-field versus high-field MRI in diagnosing breast disorders. European Radiology, 15(7), 1361–1368.
Parizel, P. M., Dijkstra, H. A., Geenen, G. J., Kint, P. A., Versteylen, R. J., van Wiechen, P. J., et al. (1995). Low-field versus high-field MR imaging of the knee: A comparison of signal behaviour and diagnostic performance. European Journal of Radiology, 19(2), 132–138.
Pearce, J. (2015). Quantifying the value of open source hardware development. Modern Economy, 6, 1–11.
Porup, J. M. (n.d.). This 3D-printed stethoscope costs $5, outperforms $200 competitors – Motherboard. Retrieved October 11, 2017, from https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/539xkn/this-3d-printed-stethoscope-head-costs-5-outperforms-200-competitors
Sferrella, S. (n.d.). Equipment service: Total cost of ownership. Retrieved November 20, 2017, from http://www.radiologybusiness.com/topics/business/equipment-service-total-cost-ownership
The Economist. (2012, June 2). When code can kill or cure. The Economist. Retrieved November 21, 2017, from http://www.economist.com/node/21556098#print
Thomson, C. C., & Jakubowski, M. (2012). Toward an open source civilization: (Innovations case narrative: Open source ecology). Innovations, 7(3), 53–70.
VITAPRINT. (n.d.). VITAPRINT: Vitaprint. Retrieved October 11, 2017, from http://irnas.eu/vitaprint
WHO. (2010). Medical devices: Managing the mismatch: An outcome of the priority medical devices project. Geneva: World Health Organization.
WHO. (2011). First WHO Global Forum on Medical Devices: Context, outcomes, and future actions
WHO. (n.d.). Baseline country survey on medical devices, 2014 update: Medical Equipment – Total density per million population. Retrieved October 11, 2017, from http://gamapserver.who.int/gho/interactive_charts/health_technologies/medical_equipment/atlas.html
Winter, L., Barghoorn, A., Blümler, P., & Niendorf, T. (2016a). COSI magnet: Halbach magnet and Halbach gradient designs for open source low cost MRI. Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 3568.
Winter, L., Haopeng, H., Barghoorn, A., Hoffmann, W., Hetzer, S., Winkler, S., et al. (2016b). Open source imaging initiative. Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 3638.
Wu, Z., Chen, W., & Nayak, K. S. (2016). Minimum field strength simulator for proton density weighted MRI. PLoS One, 11(5), e0154711.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winter, L. et al. (2019). Open Source Medical Devices for Innovation, Education and Global Health: Case Study of Open Source Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: Redlich, T., Moritz, M., Wulfsberg, J.P. (eds) Co-Creation. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97788-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97788-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97787-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97788-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)