Skip to main content
  • 159 Accesses

Abstract

Early Victorian literature and culture represented the dead in radically different ways to the culture of the late-eighteenth century: a change for which there are numerous contributory causes. As Thomas Laqueur points out, it is clear that what had once been a ‘a kind of baroque pleasure in imagining the dead as rotting corpses’ was transformed into ‘a horror of such an image’, but to ascribe this simply to a change in attitudes to death ‘hides the processes’ through which these attitude changes ‘come to have an effect’, and risks obscuring ‘other possible causes as well’. The declining authority of the established church in particular and religious belief in general, rapid urbanisation and population growth, the destabilising effects of advances in scientific knowledge, each of these elements contributed to the relatively sudden changes in how the living imagine the dead that took place in the period covered by this book. Yet, I have argued here that foremost among these causes—uniting and exploiting them in equal parts—stands a fundamental desire on the part of successive generations, from the Romantics to the Victorians, to transform social relations by reforming the ways in which the living imagined the dead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Laqueur, The Work of the Dead, 217.

  2. 2.

    If we accept C. John Sommerville’s observation that an ‘awareness of the past as irrevocably gone’ and a ‘concentration on the present age (saeculum)’ are significant characteristics of secularity, then the debate over the dead traced in this chapter is wholly secular, as it was focused on the present even when it invoked its own connection to the past. See C. John Sommerville, The Secularization of Early-Modern England: From Religious Culture to Religious Faith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), 26.

  3. 3.

    Mary Poovey, Making a Social Body: British Cultural Formation 1830–1864 (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995), 7.

  4. 4.

    See, in particular, the chapter titled ‘The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception’ in their Dialectic of Enlightenment trans. by John Cumming (London: Verso, 1997).

  5. 5.

    See Michael Prince, Philosophical Dialogue in the British Enlightenment: Theology, Aesthetics and the Novel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 21–226. In what remains the only substantial study of the genre’s revival, Frederick Keener misses this reformist context and misreads ‘Dialogues of the Dead’. He acknowledges that its resurrection in 1832 was curious and unexpected, but calls it a ‘lachrymose series’ of dialogues that ‘attacks the practice of autopsies’—a description that not only misses the article’s sharp satire, but also fails to distinguish autopsy from dissection. See Frederick M. Keener English Dialogues of the Dead (New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1973).

  6. 6.

    Warburton was still alive in December 1832, but Truepenny jokes that his heart ‘was dead cold, and not a spark of humanity left alive in it, before the passing of his bill for embittering death to the destitute (729).

  7. 7.

    ‘Dialogues of the Dead. On Sepulchral Rites and Rights’, Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country 6 (Dec. 1832), 728.

  8. 8.

    Eric Hobsbawm, The Age of Revolution, 1789–1848 (New York: New American Library, 1962), 139.

  9. 9.

    Claude Lévi-Strauss, Tristes Tropiques, trans. John and Doreen Weightman (London: Jonathan Cape, 1973), 246.

Bibliography

  • Adorno, Theodor, and Max Horkheimer. 1997. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. John Cumming. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dialogues of the Dead. On Sepulchral Rites and Rights. Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country. 6 (1832): 728-746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, Eric. 1962. The Age of Revolution, 1789–1848. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keener, Frederick M. 1973. English Dialogues of the Dead. New York/London: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, Thomas W. 2015. The Work of the Dead: A Cultural History of Mortal Remains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1973. Tristes Tropiques. Trans. John and Doreen Weightman. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poovey, Mary. 1995. Making a Social Body: British Cultural Formation 1830–1864. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, Michael. 1996. Philosophical Dialogue in the British Enlightenment: Theology, Aesthetics and the Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, C. John. 1992. The Secularization of Early-Modern England: From Religious Culture to Religious Faith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McAllister, D. (2018). Conclusion. In: Imagining the Dead in British Literature and Culture, 1790–1848. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97731-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics