Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

  • 394 Accesses

Abstract

In a context characterised by increased influxes of migrants in the European Union (EU), little attention has been paid to the EU’s policy on the integration of third country nationals. This book’s introduction formulates the research puzzle that guides subsequent chapters: can there be Europeanization without an EU competence? It starts by clarifying a number of points in order to better frame the puzzle at hand: why integrating, who integrating, how to integrate, who has the competence to integrate and integrating into what are the questions it answers. The introduction then reviews the literature on integration in a multilevel polity and proposes a definition for the concept of soft-Europeanization to be applied throughout this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a comprehensive analysis on immigration to the EU as well as integration outcomes, see OECD (2016).

  2. 2.

    So argues the EU Commission, see European Commission (2011), for more on this.

  3. 3.

    Many studies have looked into this issue, see TNS Qual+ (2011), for qualitative data within the EU.

  4. 4.

    The challenges immigration poses are plentiful, they range from discrimination on the labour market to spatial and residential segregation, racism, etc. (see inter alia Castles et al. 2013). It is not my purpose to treat these challenges. I will therefore not go further on this point.

  5. 5.

    Realising the potential of migration has been a recurring theme of the EU integration policy from 2003 onwards; see notably COM (2003) 336 final.

  6. 6.

    See Council of the European Union 14776/04 (2004); recitals 4–8.

  7. 7.

    In its report produced by the European Court of Auditors, the latter recognised the positive effect of the policy on the integration of migrants; see European Court of Auditors (2012).

  8. 8.

    See Chapter 2 for more on the OMC and its failed attempt at immigration-related matters.

  9. 9.

    For an interesting approach to the “it depends” answer, see Tilly and Goodin (2011).

  10. 10.

    See above; or see Council of the European Union 14776/04 (2004).

  11. 11.

    See inter alia Castles (1995), and Kostakopoulou (2002a), on this point.

  12. 12.

    In fact, a Spanish worker in Germany may need German courses; or a member of the Roma community may need to attend integration practices in the country she or he is a citizen of.

  13. 13.

    The refugee status stems from the 1951 Geneva Convention. There exist other protection permits granted by member states that do not fall under the Geneva Convention. These are permits defined under national law and thus fall within the definition of migrant endorsed here.

  14. 14.

    See Kostakopoulou (2002a), for a typology of models and their respective goals.

  15. 15.

    See, for instance Carrera (2006), Murphy (2009), Schain (2010), Castles et al. (2013), but see also Schain (2010), and Kundnani (2012) on how conceptions change over time.

  16. 16.

    A role was eventually granted with the Treaty of Lisbon but the policy evolved without a legal basis, notably from 2002 to 2007 (date of the adoption of the European Integration Fund ).

  17. 17.

    Some interesting examples may be found in Kostakopoulou (2002a), Groenendijk (2004), Murphy (2009).

  18. 18.

    See Box 3.2.

  19. 19.

    The existence of national criteria to be fulfilled to be granted a legal residence permit bears witness to that.

  20. 20.

    This is also the case for the long-term residence permit.

  21. 21.

    This distinction between three spheres is largely shared in specialised literature. See notably Hammar 1990; Helbling 2013; Helbling et al. 2013; de Haas and Czaika 2013.

  22. 22.

    See Van Wolleghem (2014), for a discussion.

  23. 23.

    See notably Gunningham and Sinclair (1998), on visibility and controversy.

  24. 24.

    This is also the case in Carrera (2006), Carrera and Faure Atger (2011), Murphy (2009), Gilardoni et al. (2015), and Pratt (2015).

  25. 25.

    Many are the authors agreeing on this point. See inter alia (Bache 2005; Caporaso 2007; Richardson 2012; Exadaktylos and Radaelli 2012; see also Chapter 3).

  26. 26.

    Notable exceptions are, for example, Thielemann (2001) and López-Santana (2007).

  27. 27.

    As just stated, in the case of soft law , the burden is placed on national governments evolving in national contexts with national actors ; hence a focus on member states’ individual response instead of diffusion-like mechanisms. Note in addition that this is one of the conclusions reached by Mulcahy (2011): no cross-country diffusion but rather national dynamics.

  28. 28.

    Except Denmark that does not participate in AFSJ policies and Croatia that was not a member state at the time.

  29. 29.

    Process tracing is a commonly used qualitative method; a detailed description is therefore not necessary here. Some references are provided to the reader interested in learning more about it in the appendices.

  30. 30.

    For more on process tracing, see Checkel (2005), Vennesson (2008), Mahoney (2010), and Collier (2011).

  31. 31.

    Such documents are of different sorts, they range from unpublicised minutes of expert committees to public pieces of information available on EU websites. See appendices for more on the data collected.

References

Scholarship and Expert References

  • Acosta Arcarazo, D. (2014). EU Integration Policy: Between Soft Law and Hard Law (Fondazione ISMU, KING Project, Desk Research Paper, No. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B., & Blinder, S. (2015). Who Counts as a Migrant? Definitions and Their Consequences. The Migration Observatory. Available at http://www.migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/who-counts-as-a-migrant-definitions-and-their-consequences/. Last Consulted November 12, 2016.

  • Bache, I. (2005). Europeanization and Britain: Towards Multi-level Governance? Paper prepared for the EUSA 9th Biennial Conference in Austin, Texas, March 31–April 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N. (2006). Time-Series–Cross-Section Methods. No. draft as of June 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercusson, B. (2009). European Labour Law (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A. (2001). Non-compliance in the European Union: Pathology or Statistical Artefact? Journal of European Public Policy, 8(5), 803–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bӧrzel, T. A. (2002). Pace-Setting, Foot-Dragging, and Fence-Sitting: Member State Responses to Europeanization. JCMS. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bribosia, E. (2012). Les Politiques D’intégration de l’Union Européenne et Des Etats Membres à L’épreuve Du Principe de Non-Discrimination. In Y. Pascouau & T. Strik (Eds.), Which Integration Policies for Migrants? Interaction Between the EU and its Member States (pp. 51–82). Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. (2001). The Return of Assimilation? Changing Perspectives on Immigration and Its Sequels in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 531–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso, J. (2007). The Three Worlds of Integration Theory. In P. R. Graziano (Ed.), Europeanization: New Research Agendas (pp. 23–34). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carens, J. H. (2000). Culture, Citizenship, and Community a Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera, S. (2006). A Comparison of Integration Programmes in the EU. Trends and Weaknesses. (Centre for European Policy Studies, Challenge, No. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera, S. (2008). Benchmarking Integration in the EU: Analyzing the Debate on Integration Indicators and Moving It Forward. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera, S. (2009). In Search of the Perfect Citizen? The Intersection Between Integration, Immigration and Nationality in the EU. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carrera, S., & Faure Atger, A. (2011). Integration as a Two-Way Process in the EU? Assessing the Relationship Between the European Integration Fund and the Common Basic Principles. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera, S., & Wiesbrock, A. (2009). Civic Integration of Third-Country Nationals Nationalism versus Europeanization in the Common EU Immigration Policy. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. (1995). How Nation-States Respond to Immigration and Ethnic Diversity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 21(3), 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S., de Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2013). The Age of Migration. International Population Movements in the Modern World (5th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caviedes, A. (2004). The Open Method of Co-ordination in Immigration Policy: A Tool for Prying Open Fortress Europe? Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 289–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J. T. (2005). It’s the Process Stupid! Process Tracing in the Study of European and International Politics (ARENA Centre for European Studies Working Papers No. 26), University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett, E. (2011). Immigrant Integration in Europe in a Time of Austerity. Migration Policy Institute. Available at http://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/TCM-immigrant-integration-europe-time-austerity. Last Consulted November 12, 2016.

  • Collier, D. (2011). Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 823–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haas, H., & Czaika, M. (2013). Measuring Migration Policies: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections. Migration and Citizenship, 1(2), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). The 2012 Ageing Report: Underlying Assumptions and Projection Methodologies. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exadaktylos, T., & Radaelli, C. M. (2012). Looking for Causality in the Literature on Europeanization. In T. Exadaktylos & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), Research Design in European Studies: Establishing Causality in Europeanization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, K. (2003). Introduction: In the Name of “Europe”. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The Politics of Europeanization (pp. 3–26). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, A. (2004). Britain, France, and EU Anti-discrimination Policy: The Emergence of an EU Policy Paradigm. West European Politics, 27(2), 334–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, A., & Achtnich, M. (2015). Research-Policy Dialogues in the European Union. In P. Scholten, H. Entzinger, R. Penninx, & S. Verbeek (Eds.), Integrating Immigrants in Europe. Research-Policy Dialogues (pp. 293–314). Amsterdam: IMISCOE Research Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilardoni, G., D’odorico, M., & Carrillo, D. (2015). KING Knowledge for Integration Governance Evidence on Migrants’ Integration in Europe. Milan: Fondazione ISMU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, K. (2004). Legal Concepts of Integration in EU Migration Law. European Journal of Migration and Law, 6(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, K., Fernhout, R., van Dam, D., van Oers, R., & Strik, T. (2007). The Family Reunification Directive in EU Member States: The First Year of Implementation. Nijmegen: Centre for Migration Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiraudon, V. (2003). The Constitution of a European Immigration Policy Domain: A Political Sociology Approach. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(2), 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (1998). Designing Smart Regulation. OECD and International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hailbronner, K. (2010). Implications of the EU Lisbon Treaty on EU Immigration Law. Paper Prepared for the Transatlantic Exchange for Academics in Migration Studies, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halleskov, L. (2005). The Long-Term Residents Directive: A Fulfilment of the Tampere Objective of Near-Equality? European Journal of Migration and Law, 7(2), 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammar, T. (1990). Democracy and the Nation State: Aliens, Denizens and Citizens in a World of International Migration. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handoll, J. (2012). Integration Policy in the European Union: The Question of Competence. In Y. Pascouau & T. Strik (Eds.), Which Integration Policies for Migrants? Interaction Between the EU and Its Member States (pp. 15–50). Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, W. S. (2011). Strategies for Conducting Elite Interviews. Qualitative Research, 11(4), 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild, C. (2008). Die Integration von Zuwanderern. Ein Neues Politikfeld Für Die Europäische Union. In S. Magiera, K.-P. Sommermann, & J. Ziller (Eds.), Verwaltungswissenschaft und Verwaltungspraxis in nationaler und transnationaler Perspektive (pp. 59–74). Berlin: Duncker & Humbliot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbling, M. (2013). Validating Integration and Citizenship Policy Indices. Comparative European Politics, 11(5), 555–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbling, M., Bjerre, L., Römer, F., & Zobel, M. (2013). The Immigration Policies in Comparison (IMPIC) Index: The Importance of a Sound Conceptualization. Migration and Citizenship, 1(2), 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, E. (2010). “Citizens of the Region”: Party Conceptions of Regional Citizenship and Immigrant Integration. European Journal of Political Research, 50(4), 504–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kate, M.-A., & Niessen, J. (2007). Locating Immigrant Integration Policy Measures in the Machinery of the European Commission. European Programme for Integration and Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (2009). Social Citizenship, Devolution and Policy Divergence. In S. L. Greer (Ed.), Devolution and Social Citizenship in the UK (pp. 97–116). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keman, H. (2011). Comparative Research Methods. In D. Caramani (Ed.), Comparative Politics (2nd ed., pp. 50–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostakopoulou, T. (2002a). “Integrating” Non-EU Migrants in the European Union: Ambivalent Legacies and Mutating Paradigms. Columbia Journal of European Law, 8(2), 181–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostakopoulou, T. (2002b). Long-Term Resident Third-Country Nationals in the European Union: Normative Expectations and Institutional Openings. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(3), 443–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundnani, A. (2012). Multiculturalism and Its Discontents: Left, Right and Liberal. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(2), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzieri, G. (2010). Fewer, Older and Multicultural? A Projection of the Populations of the European Union Member States by Foreign/National Background. (Eurostat Statistical Working Paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Santana, M. (2007). Soft Europeanization? How the Soft Pressure from Above Affects the Bottom (Differently): The Belgian, Spanish and Swedish Experiences. (EUI Working Papers, Vol. 10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (2010). After KKV: The New Methodology of Qualitative Research. World Politics, 62(1), 120–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2008). Immigrants, Nations, and Citizenship. Journal of Political Philosophy, 16(4), 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mügge, L., & van der Haar, M. (2016). Who Is an Immigrant and Who Requires Integration? Categorizing in European Policies. In B. Garcés-Mascareñas & R. Penninx (Eds.), Integration Processes and Policies in Europe. Contexts, Levels and Actors. (pp. 77–90). Amsterdam: IMISCOE Research Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, S. (2011). Europe’s Migrant Policies: Illusions of Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. (2009). Immigration, Integration and Citizenship in European Union Law: The Position of Third Country Nationals. Hibernian Law Journal, 8, 155–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). Recruiting Immigrant Workers: Europe. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterom-Staples, H. (2007). The Family Reunification Directive: A Tool Preserving Member State Interest or Conducive to Family Unity? In A. Baldaccini, H. Toner, & P. E. Guild (Eds.), Whose Freedom, Security and Justice? EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy (pp. 451–488). Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penninx, R. (2009). Decentralising Integration Policies. Managing Integration in Cities, Regions and Localities. (Policy Network Paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penninx, R. (2013). Research on Migration and Integration in Europe: Achievements and Lessons. Amsterdam: Vossiuspers UvA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penninx, M., Garcés-Mascareñas, B., Protasiewicz, P. M., Schwarz, H., & Caponio, T. (2014). European Cities and Their Migrant Integration Policies A State of the Art Study for the Knowledge for Integration Governance (KING) Project. (Fondazione ISMU, KING Project, Overview Paper No. 5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppelaars, C., & Scholten, P. (2008). Two Worlds Apart: The Divergence of National and Local Immigrant Integration Policies in the Netherlands. Administration & Society, 40(4), 335–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, S. (2015). EU Policymaking and Research: Case Studies of the Communication on a Community Immigration Policy and the Common Basic Principles for Integration. In P. Scholten, H. Entzinger, R. Penninx, & S. Verbeek (Eds.), Integrating Immigrants in Europe: Research-Policy Dialogues (pp. 117–131). Amsterdam: IMISCOE Research Series.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C. (2003). The Europeanization of Public Policy. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 27–56). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (2012). Supranational State Building in the European Union. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Constructing a Policy-Making State? Policy Dynamics in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenow, K. (2009). The Europeanization of Integration Policies. International Migration, 47(1), 133–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schain, M. (2010). Managing Difference: Immigrant Integration Policy in France, Britain, and the United States. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 77(1), 205–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1990). Games Real Actors Could Play: The Problem of Mutual Predictability. Rationality and Society, 2(4), 471–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholten, P., & Penninx, R. (2016). The Multilevel Governance of Migration and Integration’. In Integration Processes and Policies in Europe. Contexts, Levels and Actors (pp. 91–108). Amsterdam: IMISCOE Research Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shachar, A., & Hirschl, R. (2007). Citizenship as Inherited Property. Political Theory, 35(3), 253–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, F. (1993). Soft Law and Institutional Practice in the European Community. In S. Martin (Ed.), The Construction of Europe: Essays in Honour of Emile Noel (pp. 197–225). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szyszczak, E. (2006). Experimental Governance: The Open Method of Coordination. European Law Journal, 12(4), 486–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thielemann, E. (2001). The “Soft” Europeanization of Migration Policy: European Integration and Domestic Policy Change. Paper Presented at the ECSA Seventh Biennial International Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thränhardt, D. (2014). The State of European Integration Governance: A Comparative Evaluation. (Fondazione ISMU, KING Project, Desk Research Paper, No. 7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C., & Goodin, R. E. (2011). Overview of Contextual Political Analysis It Depends. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TNS Qual+. (2011). Migrant Integration. European Commission: Qualitative Eurobarometer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treib, O. (2014). Implementing and Complying with EU Governance Outputs. Living Reviews in European Governance, 9, 5–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimikliniotis, N. (2012). The Instrumentalisation of EU Integration Policy: Reflecting on the Dignified Efficient and Undeclared Policy Aspects. In Y. Pascouau & T. Strik (Eds.), Which Integration Policies for Migrants? Interaction Between the EU and Its Member States (pp. 109–128). Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urth, H. (2005). Building a Momentum for the Integration of Third-Country Nationals in the European Union. European Journal of Migration and Law, 7(2), 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wolleghem, P. G. (2014). Inclusive Political Community: The Challenge of Liberal Polities. In E. Codini & M. D’Odorico (Eds.), Democracy and Citizenship in the 21st Century: Critical Issues and Perspectives (pp. 23–38). Milan: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velluti, S. (2007). What European Union Strategy for Integrating Migrants? The Role of OMC Soft Mechanisms in the Development of an EU Immigration Policy. European Journal of Migration and Law, 9(1), 53–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vennesson, P. (2008). Case Studies and Process Tracing Theories and Practices. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (4th ed., pp. 223–239). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

EU Acts and Other Official Documents

  • COM. (2003). 336 Final—European Commission (2003). Communication from the Commission on Immigration, Integration and Employment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union 14776/04. (2004). Note.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council. (1999). Tampere European Council 15 And 16 October 1999, Presidency Conclusions.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Auditors. (2012). Do the European Integration Fund and European Refugee Fund Contribute Effectively to the Integration of Third-Country Nationals? (Luxembourg).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Van Wolleghem, P.G. (2019). Introduction. In: The EU’s Policy on the Integration of Migrants. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97682-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics