Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Examining Schellenberg's Hiddenness Argument

Part of the book series: Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion ((PFPR))

  • 197 Accesses

Abstract

In Weidner’s view, Schellenberg’s hiddenness argument is not a proof, i.e., a sound deductive argument, for the non-existence of God. For at least one premise has plausibly been shown to be left unsupported, namely that belief that God exists is necessary for personal relationship with God. However, the book’s research question of why, if there is a God, God’s existence is not evident to everyone, does not here find an answer. The purpose of Weidner’s detailed exposition of the hiddenness argument and particular discussion of one of its premises is to invite as broad a range of scholars as possible to seriously reflect on Schellenberg’s anti-theistic hiddenness reasoning and join the hiddenness debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    McKaughan, “Authentic faith and acknowledged risk,” 104.

  2. 2.

    Smith, Belief and History, v.

  3. 3.

    Schellenberg, The Hiddenness Argument, 54.

  4. 4.

    Schellenberg, Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason, 212–213.

  5. 5.

    See Benedict XVI., Apostolic Letter ‘Motu Proprio Data’ Porta Fidei for the Indiction of the Year of Faith , ed. Secretariat of the German Bishop’s Conference, Bonn 2012 (Città del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2011), 3.

  6. 6.

    Howard-Snyder, “Propositional Faith ,” 370.

  7. 7.

    Schellenberg, Evolutionary Religion, 81.

  8. 8.

    See Heinrich Döring, Abwesenheit Gottes: Fragen und Antworten heutiger Theologie (Paderborn: Verlag Bonifacius-Druckerei, 1977), 10.

  9. 9.

    Even though this is a road which Schellenberg, based on his writings so far, is highly unlikely to take, other proponents of his hiddenness argument might nevertheless take it.

  10. 10.

    Yandell, The Wisdom to Doubt, and The Elusive God, 214. Here, I borrow from Yandell who makes this point regarding Schellenberg’s argument for religious skepticism developed in the latter’s The Wisdom to Doubt.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronika Weidner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Weidner, V. (2018). Conclusion. In: Examining Schellenberg's Hiddenness Argument. Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97517-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics