Skip to main content

Communism as Other

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Representing Communism After the Fall

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology ((PSDP))

  • 237 Accesses

Abstract

Please confirm if hierarchy of section headings is correctly identified and given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is unclear in the Report what these ‘Romanian values’ and ‘national interest’ might represent.

  2. 2.

    Todorov echoes a Schutzian philosophy when he argues that ‘the study of history can never totally ignore the values that permeate human existence’ (2009, p. 89).

References

  • Baker, C. (2000). Locating Culture in Action: Membership Categorisation in Texts and Talk. In A. Lee & C. Poynton (Eds.), Culture and Text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies (pp. 99–113). St. Leonards: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmeier, J. (2010). After the Archive: Remapping Memory. Culture & Psychology, 16, 5–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucur, M. (2009). Heroes and Victims: Remembering War in Twentieth-Century Romania. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H. (2008). What is History? London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesneaux, J. (1978). Past and Futures or What is History For. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W. (1993). The Terms of Political Discourse (3rd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J. (2001). Human Practices and the Observability of the “Macro-Social”. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. Savigny (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp. 29–41). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M., & McCoy, L. (2006). Institutional Ethnography: Using Interviews to Investigate Ruling Relations. In D. Smith (Ed.), Institutional Ethnography as Practice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (1985). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eglin, P., & Hester, S. (2003). The Montreal Massacre: A Story of Membership Categorisation Analysis. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1937). Analysis Terminable and Interminable. Standard Edition, 23, 216–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, S. (1992). Introduction. In S. Friedlander (Ed.), Probing the Limits of Representation: Nazism and the Final Solution (pp. 1–21). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S. (2010). Psychoanalysis Outside the Clinic: Interventions in Psychosocial Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallinat, A. (2009). Intense Paradoxes of Memory: Researching Moral Questions about Remembering the Socialist Past. History and Anthropology, 20, 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurwitsch, A. (1975). Introduction. In Collected Papers III: Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gussi, A. (2017). Paradoxes of Delayed Transitional Justice. In L. Stan & L. Turcescu (Eds.), Justice, Memory and Redress in Romania: New Insights (pp. 76–99). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayyusi, L. (1991). Values and Moral Judgement: Communicative Praxis as Moral Order. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp. 227–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, K. (1991). Re-Thinking History. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LaCapra, D. (2001). Writing History, Writing Trauma. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (2009). Ethnomethodology and History: Documents and the Production of History. Ethnographic Studies, 11, 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, A. (2002). The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. (2005). Memory and Democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 1320–1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2013). Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olick, J. K. (2007). The Politics of Regret: On Collective Memory and Historical Responsibility. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, R. (2008). Memory, History and the Claims of the Past. Memory Studies, 1, 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranciere, J. (2007). On the Shores of Politics. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. (1967). Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality (Eds. M. A. Natanson & H. L. van Breda). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. (1975). Collected Papers III: Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy (Ed. I. Schütz and with an introduction by Aron Gurwitsch). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1974). The Social Construction of Documentary Reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44, 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1978). ‘K is Mentally Ill’ the Anatomy of a Factual Account. Sociology, 12(1), 23–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (2004). Writing the Social: Critique, Theory and Investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, E. (2010). “I’m Not Gonna Hit a Lady”: Conversation Analysis, Membership Categorization and Men’s Denials of Violence Towards Women. Discourse & Society, 21, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, R. (2000). Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, T. (2009). In Defence of the Enlightenment. London: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. (1995). Representing Social Action. Discourse & Society, 6, 81–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. (2009). Constitutive Practices and Garfinkel’s Notion of Trust: Revisited. Journal of Classical Sociology, 9, 475–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (2002). Voices of Collective Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J., & Karumidze, Z. (2009). Spinning the Past: Russian and Georgian Accounts of the War of August 2008. Memory Studies, 2(3), 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1992). Historical Emplotment and the Problem of Truth. In S. Friedlander (Ed.), Probing the Limits of Representation: Nazism and the Final Solution (pp. 37–53). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tileagă, C. (2018). Communism as Other. In: Representing Communism After the Fall. Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97394-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics