Abstract
The Author examines the ambiguous relationship between Eurojust and the recently established European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), by retracing the history of these two bodies. While Eurojust has for a long time been the most serious alternative to a supranational investigation authority, although with an exclusively coordinating task, it is now destined to coexist with EPPO. An analysis of this relationship, mainly based on mutual cooperation and the development of operational, administrative and management links between them, will be carried out.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
OJ L 283, 31 October 2017.
- 2.
Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Croatia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Portugal, Czech Republic, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Italy, Latvia, Estonia and Austria.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruggieri, F. (2019). Eurojust and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. Introduction to a Historic Reform. In: Rafaraci, T., Belfiore, R. (eds) EU Criminal Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97319-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97319-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97318-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97319-7
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)