Skip to main content

Introduction: European Film and Television Co-production

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
European Film and Television Co-production

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the field of European film and television co-production and outlines the themes and methodological approaches employed within the volume European Film and Television Co-production: Policy and Practice. It describes the policy-driven European co-production model, focusing both on its historical evolution (emergence of official co-productions and proliferation of co-production treaties), and explores current developments triggered by recent tax incentives, non-official and TV co-productions, as well as digital media platforms. Furthermore, the chapter points to major methodological and theoretical gaps in the existing scholarship. To address those gaps, the chapter proposes a research methodology that would allow scholars to move closer to policy makers and practitioners, ensuring more cross-sectoral dialogue in researching co-productions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for instance the UK-Australia co-production Back of Beyond (1954).

  2. 2.

    For a detailed discussion, see Jäckel (2003b).

  3. 3.

    Although established in 1988, Eurimages only became operational one year later, in 1989.

  4. 4.

    See also McElroy (2016) on the benefits for ‘small nations’ of accessing bigger markets when venturing into television co-productions with partners from bigger countries.

  5. 5.

    See, for instance, Jäckel (2003a) on early French-Italian collaborations; Weissmann (2012); or Redvall (Forthcoming 2019) for examples from the long history of UK–US collaborations.

  6. 6.

    In this volume, we have invited the Executive Director of Eurimages to speak for himself about the fund’s evolution (Chap. 14) and European producers to provide first-hand accounts of their own experiences of the fund (in Chaps. 19, 21 and 22).

  7. 7.

    The Co-production Research Network is a consortium of scholars, policy makers and industry practitioners with a shared concern to improve dialogue across these three domains (www.copro-research-network.org).

  8. 8.

    The recent proliferation of tax incentives across Europe has been identified as a moment of policy transition—from a ‘direct subsidy economy’ to a ‘new economy’, which is ‘mainly aimed at larger scale more commercial film projects’ (Morawetz et al. 2007, 427).

  9. 9.

    There is an increasing number of examples where official co-production status has been granted to projects financed predominantly through tax incentives (Mitric and Levie 2016). Such projects must still be able to demonstrate that they comply with official co-production eligibility criteria, as outlined in the chapter by Hammett-Jamart in this volume.

  10. 10.

    See, for instance, the following links UK: http://www.bfi.org.uk/film-industry/british-certification-tax-relief/co-production and France (p. 29): http://www.filmfrance.net/telechargement/IncentivesGuide2017.pdf.

  11. 11.

    See, for instance, Sundet (2017) for a case study of Lilyhammer (2012–2014) a joint venture between Norwegian public broadcaster NRK and Netflix.

References

  • Baltruschat, Doris. 2010. Global Media Ecologies: Networked Production in Film and Television. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Coproductions, Global Markets and New Media Ecologies. In Transnational Cinema in Europe, ed. Manuel Palacio and Jörg Türschmann. Vienna: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergfelder, Tim. 2000. The Nation Vanishes: European Co-productions and Popular Genre Formula in the 1950s and 1960s. In Cinema and Nation, ed. Mette Hjort and Scott Mackenzie, 139–152. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blind, Sofia, and Blind Hallenberger, eds. 1996. European Co-productions in Television and Film. Heidelberg: Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondebjerg, Ib, Cecilie Astrupgaard, Rasmus Helles, Signe Sophus Lai, Eva N. Redvall, and Henrik Søndergaard. 2017. Transnational European Television Drama: Production, Genres and Audiences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brandstrup, Pil G., and Eva N. Redvall. 2005. Breaking the Borders: Danish Coproductions in the 1990s. In Transnational Cinema in a Global North, ed. A. Nestingen and T.G. Elkington, 141–164. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, John T. 2008. Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Stuart. 1993. Cultural Studies from the Viewpoint of Cultural Policy. In Nation, Culture, Text: Australian Cultural and Media Studies, ed. Graeme Turner, 126–139. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vinck, Sofie. 2009. Europudding or Europaradise: A Performance Evaluation of the Eurimages Co-production Film Fund, Twenty Years after Its Inception. Communications—The European Journal of Communication Research 34 (3): 257–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurimages. 2016. Support for Co-production: Full-Length Feature Films, Animations and Documentaries. Strasbourg: Council of Europe (Eurimages).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney, Angus. 1996. The State of European Cinema: A New Dose of Reality. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. The International Film Business: A Market Guide beyond Hollywood. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guback, H. Thomas. 1969. The International Film Industry: Western Europe and America since 1945. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammett-Jamart, Julia. 2014. Trade in National Cinema: Australian Film Policy Implementation on French-Australian Official Co-productions 1986–2006. PhD thesis, University of Wollongong (Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Bridging the Gap: Towards a Dialogue between Screen Production, Policy and Scholarship. In Reconceptualising Film Policies, ed. Nolwenn Mingant and Cecilia Tirtaine, 125–138. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, Susan. 1993. French National Cinema. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjort, Mette. 2010. On the Plurality of Cinematic Transnationalism. In World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives, ed. Natasa Durovicova and Kathleen Newman, 12–33. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, Colin, Stuart McFadyen, Adam Finn, and Anne Jäckel. 1995. Film and Television Co-production: Evidence from Canadian-European Experience. European Journal of Communication 10 (2): 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäckel, Anne. 2003a. Dual Nationality Film Productions in Europe after 1945. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 23 (3): 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003b. European Film Industries. London: Palgrave BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Pia M., Jakob I. Nielsen, and Anne Marit Waade. 2016. When Public Service Drama Travels: The internationalisation of Danish Television Drama and the Associated Production Funding Models. Journal of Popular Television 4 (1): 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallas, Christina. 1996. The Benefit and the Cost of Co-production. In European Co-productions in Television and Film, ed. Sofia Blind and Gerd Hallenberger, 59–73. Heidelberg: Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liz, Mariana. 2015. From European Co-productions to the Euro-Pudding. In Europeanness of European Cinema, ed. Mary Harrod, Mariana Liz, and Alissa Timoshkina, 73–87. London: I.B.Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Euro-Visions: Europe in Contemporary Cinema. London: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, Ruth. 2016. Television Production in Small Nations. Journal of Popular Television 4 (1): 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitric, Petar and Joelle Levie. 2016. Medici Report 5: International Co-productions, Development, Gender and quotas. Annual Report, FOCAL. Lozanne: FOCAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawetz, Norbert, et al. 2007. Finance, Policy and Industrial Dynamics: The Rise of Co-productions in the Film Industry. Industry and Innovation 14 (4): 421–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Per, and Charlotte Appelgren. 2007. The Fine Art of Co-producing. Copenhagen: Neuman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, Tom. 1996. Australian National Cinema. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redvall, Eva N. Forthcoming, 2019. Mainstream Trends and Masterpiece Traditions: ITV’s Downton Abbey as a Hit Heritage Drama for Masterpiece in the US. In Contemporary Transatlantic Television Drama, ed. M. Hilmes, M. Hills, and R. Pearson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivi, Luisa. 2007. European Cinema after 1989: Cultural Identity and Transnational Production. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Barbara J. 2008. Global Television: Co-Producing Culture. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundet, Vilde Schanke. 2017. Co-Produced Television Drama and the Cost of Transnational ‘Success’: The Making of Lilyhammer. In Building Successful & Sustainable Film & Television Businesses: A Cross-National Perspective, ed. E. Bakøy, R. Puijk, and A. Spicer. Bristol: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talavera, M. Julio, G. Fontaine, and M. Kanzler. 2016. Public Financing for Film and Television Content: The State of Soft Money in Europe. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, Michael. 2002. Politics of Contemporary European Cinema: Histories, Borders, Diasporas. London: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissmann, Elke. 2012. Transnational Television Drama: Special Relations and Mutual Influence between the US and UK. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hammett-Jamart, J., Mitric, P., Redvall, E.N. (2018). Introduction: European Film and Television Co-production. In: Hammett-Jamart, J., Mitric, P., Novrup Redvall, E. (eds) European Film and Television Co-production. Palgrave European Film and Media Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97157-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics