Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Educational Governance Research ((EGTU,volume 9))

Abstract

In this chapter we present the findings of an investigation into the ways in which the discourses and practices of school design produce educational spaces which influence the discourses and practices of teaching and learning when the building is occupied. This investigation involved the development of a methodology for systematically analysing the relationship of school space to the experiences of students, teachers and parents. It expands notions of post occupancy evaluation (POE) research by exploring how the motives of an educational vision which informed an initial school design, those of the final building and those of the people who occupy that building interact in a way which influences experiences of the end users. In this way we sought to understand more about the extent to which a building regulates or governs the behaviour of those who occupy it. Through our approach to multi-professional pedagogic post occupancy evaluation, we came to the view that a building may be understood as a tool which may be used to facilitate change rather than as an instrument of change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Burke, C., & Grosvenor, I. (2008). School. London: Reaktion Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N., & Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to doing it better. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2010). Young children as protagonists and the role of participatory, visual methods in engaging multiple perspectives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2005). Spaces to play: More listening to young children using the mosaic approach. London: National Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, I. (1981). The politics of education and architectural design: The instructive example of British primary education. British Educational Research Journal, 7(2), 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, I. (1985). Teachers’ assessments of primary school buildings: The role of the physical environment in education. British Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • County Council. (2005). Template: Schools for the future. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfES. (2003). Building schools for the future: Consultation on a new approach to capital investment. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfES. (2004). Building schools for the future: A new approach to capital investment. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A., Daniels, H., Gallagher, T., Leadbetter, J., & Warmington, P. (2009). Improving inter-professional collaborations: Multi-agency working for children’s well being. Oxford: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Vähäaho, T. (1999). When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical approaches (pp. 345–374). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escolano, A. (2003). The school in the city: School architecture as discourse and as text. Pedagogica Historica, 39(1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galasiu, A. D., & Veitch, J. A. (2006). Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in day lit offices: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 38, 728–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hygge, S. (2003). Classroom experiments on the effects of different noise sources and sound levels on long-term recall and recognition in children. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 895–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, S. (2011). Review of education capital. London: DfE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiringer, R., & Cardellino, P. (2011). Schools for the twenty-first century: School design and educational transformation. British Educational Research Journal, 37(6), 915–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office. (2009). The building schools for the future programme: Renewing the secondary school estate. Report HC 135 Session 2008–2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, I., Clark, E., Holland, M., Emerton, C., & Wolstenholme, C. (2009). Condition matters: Pupil voices on the design and condition of secondary schools, Research report. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, J. (2007). Visual methods and the visual culture of schools. Visual Studies, 22(1), 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, R. J., Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U., Nevalainen, A., & Moschandreas, D. (2006). A preliminary study on the association between ventilation rates in classrooms and student performance. Indoor Air, 16(6), 465–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, H. M., Learoyd-Smith, S., Stables, A., & Daniels, H. (2014). Continuity and conflict in school design: A case study from building schools for the future. Intelligent Buildings International, 7(2–3), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2014.927349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B., & Boynton, A. (1998). Invented here: Maximizing your organization’s internal growth and profitability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterbottom, M., & Wilkins, A. (2009). Lighting and discomfort in the classroom. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolner, P., Hall, E., Wall, K., Higgins, S., Blake, A., & McCaughey, C. (2005). School building programmes: Motivations, consequences and implications, Research report. Reading: CfBT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolner, P., Hall, E., Higgins, S., McCaughy, C., & Wall, K. (2007). A sound foundation? What we know about the impact of environments on learning and the implications for building schools for the future. Oxford Review of Education, 33(1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry Daniels .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Daniels, H., Tse, H.M. (2018). Design As a Social Practice. In: Grosvenor, I., Rosén Rasmussen, L. (eds) Making Education: Material School Design and Educational Governance. Educational Governance Research, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97019-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97019-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97018-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97019-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics