Skip to main content

Integrated Policies for Terraces: The Role of Landscape Observatories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 782 Accesses

Part of the book series: Environmental History ((ENVHIS,volume 9))

Abstract

So far, we do not have a systematic evidence about the effectiveness of single policies, nor of their different combinations applied in diverse contexts for safeguarding and bringing into new life terraced landscapes. We just know that policies that are more diffuse include regulations about how terraced landscapes should be preserved and restored, and some financial compensative measures in the frame of agricultural policies. From an academic point of view, if we consider, according to Lowi (1972), the four types of policies usually employed (distributive, redistributive, regulatory and constituent), it becomes quite clear that successful policies need a sensible combination of these different “resources”. Just as an example: a restriction (like a rule about how to restore terraces) is more easily accepted if combined with some kind of benefit (financial, but also of other nature) and will have an easier implementation if the diverse institutions share it. However, such an approach is seldom practised, since terraced landscapes do not represent a sectoral interest, and no financial or economic lobby pushes for redirecting public policies towards effectiveness in preserving this collective heritage. In such a general context, local landscape observatories represent a new and great resource, since they are reframing the issue from below, adopting de facto an integrated point of view and a collective interest. In Italy, many of them have done an important job in raising consciousness about terraced landscapes heritage value, but also acting directly for repairing them, for preventing abandonment, for promoting new sustainable agriculture, for spreading good practices. After an introduction dealing with policies for terraced landscapes, the paper will therefore explore, with reference mainly to Italy, what landscape observatories are, how they work both on a voluntary or institutional base, how they are helping to reframe the terraced landscapes preservation issue, looking into new ways to reconcile economy and landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On this issue of giving back new productive uses to terraced landscapes, see, for instance, Baldeschi (2001).

  2. 2.

    For the Regione Piemonte terraces, for instance, the only panel presented in the ITLA exhibition on terraced landscapes (Venice-Padua, October 2016) has been submitted by a local NGO, La prima langa. Osservatorio per il paesaggio delle valli Alta Bormida e Uzzone.

  3. 3.

    Among many others, I would quote the action taken for the French Parc des Cevennes, the Suisse Domleschg project and even the Trento Landscape Observatory/STEP, an Italian case that so far represents a positive exception.

  4. 4.

    In marginal areas, many rural plots of land are property of emigrated people, whose descendant have never visited or reclaimed the property, and are often unknown to local public institutions.

  5. 5.

    A multidisciplinary work on potential new perspectives for Cinque Terre terraces in Besio (2002).

  6. 6.

    This means that the implementation of instruments like the European Landscape Convention, promoted by the Council of Europe, is a national stuff, while EU policies pay no attention to these objectives.

  7. 7.

    For instance, in some regions of Italy (like Liguria), the permit to cut vegetation on terraces is easy to obtain, in others (like Piedmont) much more difficult.

  8. 8.

    Both plans can be downloaded by the two regions’ institutional Web pages. For the plan of Tuscany, see also Marson (2016).

  9. 9.

    https://box.beniculturali.it/index.php/s/6HDyFyQyZL9n8ic#pdfviewer.

  10. 10.

    The local Municipalities Union, with special competences since it is a territory in “mountain” area.

  11. 11.

    The technical cartography (CTR), produced by the regional administration, represented just a limited number of terraces, out of the many present on the terrain. Second cycle diploma work by Tres and Zatta, tutor prof. Domenico Patassini, 2006. See also Fontanari and Patassini (2008).

  12. 12.

    The only presence of Piedmont at the International exhibition of terraced landscapes (ITLA 2016 in Venice and Padua) has been one of the High Bormida and Uzzone valleys, thanks to the homonymous local landscape observatory.

  13. 13.

    The scientific committee hosts researchers and professors by all the nearby universities, including Genua, Turin, Alessandria and Pollenzo (www.laprimalanga.it).

  14. 14.

    Primary schools but also the local rural school for adults.

  15. 15.

    First, in the 1950s, for emigration towards larger towns industries offering a better salaries perspective, and a couple of decades later for the formal dismissal of agricultural pacts (mezzadria) between landowner and agricultural workers. With this last change, most agricultural areas less apt to industrialized agriculture suffered dismissal.

References

  • Agnoletti M (ed) (2010) Paesaggi rurali storici. Per un catalogo nazionale, Laterza

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldeschi P (2001) Il Chianti fiorentino. Un progetto per la tutela del paesaggio. Laterza

    Google Scholar 

  • Barca F (2015) Un progetto per le “aree interne” dell’Italia. In: Meloni B (ed) Aree interne e progetti d’area. Rosenberg & Sellier

    Google Scholar 

  • Besio M (ed) (2002) Il vino del mare. Marsilio

    Google Scholar 

  • Castiglioni B, Varotto M (2013) Paesaggio e osservatori locali. L’esperienza del Canale di Brenta. Franco Angeli

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontanari E, Patassini D (eds) (2008) Paesaggi terrazzati dell’arco alpino. Esperienze di progetto, Marsilio

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi T (1972) Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Adm Rev 32(4):298–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnaghi A (2005) The urban village, a charter for democracy and local self-sustainable development. Zed Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Marson A (2016). La struttura del paesaggio. Una sperimentazione multidisciplinare per il piano della Toscana. Laterza

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R (1993) Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Marson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marson, A. (2019). Integrated Policies for Terraces: The Role of Landscape Observatories. In: Varotto, M., Bonardi, L., Tarolli, P. (eds) World Terraced Landscapes: History, Environment, Quality of Life. Environmental History, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96815-5_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics