Skip to main content

Scenario Set as a Representative of Possible Futures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2777 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Abstract

Because of the inherent disconnect between the length of the procurement cycle and the dynamic time scales of the security environment, future military capability planning presents a unique challenge. The security environment can change very rapidly, and the extent of the changes, and thus the future environment, is potentially unpredictable. In contrast, the procurement cycles responsible for the renewal of the capabilities are typically on the order of decades. The traditional approach to capability-based acquisition consists in the development of a scenario set representing possible futures, and then plan capabilities to address the challenges presented by the scenario set. This approach is based on an implicit assumption that the chosen scenario set is sufficiently representative of all possible futures. Intuitively, if the scenarios are selected somewhat randomly (i.e., there is no significant selection bias that would eliminate certain futures), then a solution that works for the set of planning scenarios, whether in optimization or capability scheduling sense, is more likely to work for any feasible future. In this paper we examine this assumption in a more systematic way and attempt to express likelihood that a solution to a limited set of vignettes is a solution for all possible futures, at least for some special cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hobson, B.: Obsolescence challenges, Part 3: identifying future capability requirements. Can. Naval Rev. 4(4), 10–14 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bowden, F.D.J., Pincombe, B., Williams, P.B.: Feasible scenario spaces: a new way of measuring capability impacts. In: 21st International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Gold Coast, Australia (2015). www.mssanz.org.au/modsim2015. Accessed 11 Apr 2018

  3. Taylor, B., Wood, D.: Guide to capability-based planning, TR-JSA-TP3-2-2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor, B.: Toward an Enhanced Capability Based Planning Approach, DRDC-RDDC-2017-D063 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Williams, P.B., Bowden, F.D.J.: Dynamic morphological exploration. In: 22nd National Conference of the Australian Society for Operations Research, Adelaide, Australia (2013). www.asor.org.au/conferences/asor2013. Accessed 11 Apr 2018

  6. Chief of Force Development: The Future Security Environment 2013 – 2040, NDID # A-FD-005-001/AF-003 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chuka, N., Friesen, S.K.: Divining the Force Planning Scenarios: Methodology, Experiences and Lessons from the Canadian Department of National Defence, RTO-MP-SAS-088, RTO System Analysis and Studies Panel Specialists’ Meeting, Sweden (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis, P.K., Bankes, S.C., Egner, M.: Enhancing Strategic Planning with Massive Scenario Generation Theory and Experiments, RAND Corporation (2007). https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/technical_reports/2007/RAND_TR392.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2018

  9. Wesolkowski, S., Eisler, C.: Capability-based models for force structure computation and evaluation, NATO Workshop on Integrating Modelling & Simulation in the Defence Acquisition Lifecycle and Military Training Curriculum, STO-MP-MSG-126 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taleb, N.N., The Black Swan: The Impact of Highly Improbable, Random House Trade Paperbacks, 2 edn. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yao, W.-M., et al.: (Particle Data Group): Statistics. J. Phys. G33(1) (2006). http://pdg.lbl.gov/2006/reviews/statrpp.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2018

  12. Kotz, S., van Dorp, J.R.: Beyond Beta: Other Continuous Families of Distributions with Bounded Support and Applications, pp. 1–28. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore (2004). https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/5720#t=toc. Accessed 16 Apr 2018

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Dobias, P., Eisler, C.: Modeling a naval force protection scenario in MANA. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. Lett. 1(1), 2–7 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lauren, M.K., Stephen, R.T.: Map-aware non-uniform automata (MANA) – a New Zealand approach to scenario modelling. J. Battlefield Technol. 5, 1–13 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. McIntosh, G.C., Galligan, D.P., Anderson, M.A., Lauren, M.K.: MANA (Map Aware Non-Uniform Automata) Version 4 User Manual, DTA TN 2007/3 NR 1465 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dobias, P., Bouayed, Z., Woodill, G., Bassindale, S.: Optimal number of non-lethal launchers study - Nickel Abeyance II, DRDC CORA TR 2006-18 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shapiro, S.S., Wilk, M.B.: Analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika 52(3), 591–611 (1965). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2333709. Accessed 16 Apr 2018

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Triefenbach, F.: Design of Experiments: The D-Optimal Approach and Its Implementation as a Computer Algorithm, Thesis, Umea University (2008). http://www8.cs.umu.se/education/-examina/Rapporter/FabianTtriefenbach.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Dobias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Crown

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dobias, P., Eisler, C. (2018). Scenario Set as a Representative of Possible Futures. In: Morales, A., Gershenson, C., Braha, D., Minai, A., Bar-Yam, Y. (eds) Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IX. ICCS 2018. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96661-8_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics