Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Clinical Gastroenterology ((CG))

  • 370 Accesses

Abstract

Minimally invasive hernia surgery is a field of general surgery that should be understood by the internist. Many patients will ask for guidance on this option. This chapter develops the general preoperative workup, the general intraoperative details, and the postoperative expectations that can be seen following these procedures. In general, the MIS method allows for a faster recovery from the surgery and superior outcomes compared to the traditional open surgical approach. The relatively recent addition of the surgical robot to the MIS repair of hernias has introduced another layer of MIS repair. It should be remembered that the robot is a laparoscopic method rather than a truly new operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kirkpatrick T, Allain BW, LeBlanc KA. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. In: KA LB, Kingsnorth AN, Sanders D, editors. Management of abdominal wall hernias. 5th ed: Springer; In press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. LeBlanc KA, Booth WV. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Lap Endo. 1993;3(1):39–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liang MK, Holihan JL, Itani K, et al. Ventral hernia management: expert consensus guided by systematic review. Ann Surg. 2017;265(1):80–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(6):392–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW. Hop et al. long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):578–83; discussion 583–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. LeBlanc KA. Prostheses and products for hernioplasty. In: KA LB, Kingsnorth AN, Sanders D, editors. Management of abdominal wall hernias. 5th ed: Springer; In press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rosen MJ, Bauer JJ, Harmaty M, Carbonell AM, Cobb WS, Matthews B, Goldblatt MI, Selzer DJ, Poulose BK, Hansson BME, Rosman C, Chao JJ, Jacobsen GR. Multicenter, prospective longitudinal study of the recurrence, surgical site infection, and quality of life after contaminated ventral hernia repair using biosynthetic absorbable mesh. Ann Surg. 2017;265:205–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McCormack K, Scott N, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant A, Collaboration of EU Hernia Trialists. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;1: Art. No:CD001785. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.

  9. Roll S, Skinovsky J. Laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair. In: Novitsky YW, editor. Hernia surgery − current principles. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 451–60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kindel T, Oleynikov D. Laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. In: Novitsky YW, editor. Hernia surgery − current principles. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 461–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Topart P, Vandenbroucke F, Lozac’h P. Tisseel versus tack staples as mesh fixation in totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of groin hernias: a retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(5):724–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Taylor C, Layani L, Liew V, Ghusn M, Crampton N, White S. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation, early results of a large randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(3):757–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hallén M, Sevonius D, Westerdahl J, Gunnarsson U, Sandblom G. Risk factors for reoperation due to chronic groin postherniorrhaphy pain. Hernia. 2015;19:863–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Belyansky I, Tsirline VB, Klima DA, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Heniford T. Prospective, comparative study of postoperative quality of life in TEP, TAPP, and modified Lichtenstein repairs. Ann Surg. 2011;254:709–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carter NH, Chen DC. Chronic pain after inguinal repair. In: KA LB, Kingsnorth AN, Sanders D, editors. Management of abdominal wall hernias. 5th ed: Springer; In press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Novitsky YW, Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Heniford BT. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in obese patients: a new standard of care. Arch Surg. 2006;141(1):57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Soliani G, De Troia A, Protinari M, Targa S, Carcoforo P, Vasquez G, Fisichella PM, Feo CV. Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study with costs analysis on 269 patients. Hernia. 2017;21:609–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Elieson MJ, Corder JM, LeBlanc KA. Enterotomy and mortality rates of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: a review of the literature. JSLS. 2007;11:408–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma A, Khullar R, Soni V, Baijal M, Kapahi A, Najma K, Chowbey PK. Iatrogenic enterotomy in laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: a single center experience of 2,346 patients over 17 years. Hernia. 2013;17(5):581–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. LeBlanc KA. Mesh overlap is a key determinant of hernia recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2016;20(1):85–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tulloh B, de Beaux A. Defects and donuts: the importance of the mesh:defect area ratio. Hernia. 2016;20:893–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hauters P, Desmet J, Gherardi D, Dewaele S, Poilvache H, Malvaux P. Assessment of predictive factors for recurrence in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a bridging technique. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:3656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5401-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tandon A, Pathak S, Lyons NJ, Nunes QM, Daniels IR, Smart NJ. Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2016;103(12):1598–607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rakic S, LeBlanc KA. The radiologic appearance of prosthetic materials use in hernia repair and a recommended classification. AJR. 2013;201(6):11890–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gonzales A, Escobar E, Romero R, Walker G, Mejias J, Gallas M, Dickens E, Johnson CJ, Rabaza J, Kudsi OY. Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair: a multicenter evaluation of clinical outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(3):1342–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

LeBlanc, K.A., LeBlanc, Z.Z. (2019). Minimally Invasive Hernia Surgery. In: Rezac, C., Donohue, K. (eds) The Internist's Guide to Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery . Clinical Gastroenterology. Humana Press, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96631-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96631-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96630-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96631-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics