Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Women in the Public Sphere: Gendered Language

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender, Discourse and Ideology in Italian

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality ((PSLGS))

Abstract

Language used for, about and by female politicians, is qualitatively and quantitatively investigated to demonstrate how language operates to signal gender, gendering and gendered prototyping. The media have found ways to expose a ‘war among female politicians’, manipulating the choices of the language they use to refer to themselves. Marked forms are used more than unmarked in the case of sindaca (feminine) and sindaco (unmarked masculine) when referring to three female mayors in Italian newspapers. Sexual terms used to insult female politicians about their alleged promiscuous private lives seems to be purposefully used to demonstrate their unsuitability to operate in the institutional public spheres. On the contrary, female MPs legitimize their position in the parliament through language, also building a bond with women outside of the Chamber.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alvanoudi, Angeliki. 2014. Grammatical gender in interaction: Cultural and cognitive aspects. Leiden: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia, Filippo Maria. 2015. Stai zitta e va’ in cucina. Breve storia del maschilismo in politica da Togliatti a Grillo. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, Judith (ed.). 2006. Speaking out: The female voice in public contexts. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzanella, Carla. 2002. The significance of context in comprehension: The ‘we case’. Foundations of Science 7 (3): 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzanella, Carla. 2009. Noi come meccanismo di intensità. In Fenomeni di intensità dell’italiano parlato, ed. Barbara Gili Fivela and Carla Bazzanella, 101–114. Firenze: Franco Cesati Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengoechea, Mercedes. 2011. How effective is ‘femininity’? Media portrayals of the effectiveness of the first Spanish woman Defence Minister. Gender and Language 5 (2): 405–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, Meriel, and Thomas Bloor. 2007. The practice of critical discourse analysis. London: Hodder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, Marilynn B., and Wendi, Gardner. 1996. Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 (1): 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brezina, Vaclav, Tony McEnery, and Steven Wattam. 2015. Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20 (2): 139–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer. 2006. Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews. Text and Talk 26 (1): 3–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Deborah. 2006. Theorising the female voice in public contexts. In Speaking out: The female voice in public contexts, ed. Judith Baxter, 3–20. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Deborah, and Sylvia Shaw. 2016. Gender, power and political speech: Women and language in the 2015 UK General Election. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, Ana. 2009. Women acting for women? An analysis of gender and debate participation in the British House of Commons 2005–2007. Journal of Politics and Gender 5 (1): 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, Penny, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, Penny, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1998. Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live. In Language and gender: A reader, ed. Janet Coates, 484–494. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, Penny, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2003. Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, Penny, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2007. Putting communities of practice in their place. Gender and Language 1: 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formato, Federica. 2014. Language use and gender in the Italian parliament. PhD, thesis, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Formato, Federica. 2016. Linguistic markers of sexism in the Italian media: A case study of ministra and ministro. Corpora 11 (3): 371–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formato, Federica. 2017. ‘Ci sono troie in giro in Parlamento che farebbero di tutto’. Italian female politicians seen through a sexual lens. Gender and Language 11 (3): 389–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Blanco, Iñaki, and Karin Wahl-Jorgensen. 2012. The Discursive construction of women politicians in the European Press. Feminist Media Studies 12 (3): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Rosalind. 2007. Gender and the media. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2002. Grammar and function of we. In Us and others: Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures, ed. Anna Duszak, 31–49. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Janet. 2006. Gendered talk at work: Constructing gender identity through workplace discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iñigo-Mora, Isabel. 2004. On the use of the personal pronoun we in communities. Journal of Language and Politics 3 (1): 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilgarriff, Adam. 2012. Getting to know your corpus. In International conference on text, speech and dialogue, 3–15, September 3–7. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koller, Veronika. 2014. Applying social cognition research to critical discourse studies: The case of collective identities. In Contemporary critical discourse studies, ed. Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 149–167. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, Veronika, and Wodak Ruth. 2008. Introduction: Shifting boundaries and emergent publics. In Handbook of communication in the public sphere, ed. Ruth Wodak and Veronika Koller, 1–17. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Paul, and Pam Papadelos. 2017. Who stands for the norm? The place of metonymy in androcentric language. Social Semiotics 27 (1): 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElhinny, Bonnie. 1997. Ideologies of public and private language in sociolinguistics. In Gender and discourse, ed. Ruth Wodak, 106–139. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McElhinny, B. 2003. Theorizing gender in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology. In The handbook of language and gender, ed. Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 21–42. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Sara. 2008. Language and sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mullany, Louise. 2007. Gendered discourse in the professional workplace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, Alastair. 1994. The politics of pronouns. ELT Journal 8 (2): 173–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, Mühlhäusler, and Rom Harré. 1990. Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, Deborah A., Dale T. Miller, and Jenifer R. Lightdale. 1994. Asymmetries in attachment to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20 (5): 484–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, Katarzyna, and Lily I-Wen Su. 2011. The 1st person plural in political discourse: American politicians in interviews and in a debate. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (13): 3251–3266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyykkö, Riitta. 2002. Who is ‘us’ in Russian political discourse. In Us and Others: Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures, ed. Anna Duszak, 233–248. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Neil Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Mike. 2008. WordSmith Tools version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Sylvia. 2000. Language, gender and floor apportionment in political debates. Discourse and Society 11 (3): 401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2015. Resisting epistemologies of user-generated content? In Cooptation, segregation and the boundaries of journalism, ed. Matt Carlson, 169–185. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wales, Katie. 1996. Personal pronouns in present-day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Clare. 2001. Gender and discourse: Language and power in politics, the church and organisations. Edinburgh: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, John. 1990. Politically speaking. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lancaster, UK

    Federica Formato

Authors
  1. Federica Formato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Formato, F. (2019). Women in the Public Sphere: Gendered Language. In: Gender, Discourse and Ideology in Italian. Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96556-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96556-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96555-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96556-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation