Skip to main content

Updated Technology and Early Detection of Cancers: Pulmonary, Breast, Colon, and Prostate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 807 Accesses

Part of the book series: Practical Issues in Geriatrics ((PIG))

Abstract

Early detection of cancer or cancer relapse is an important issue to improve survival. However, up to now, one of the most common strategies to early detect cancer or for a routine follow-up after cancer treatment is to track the appearance of tumors by performing regular clinical assessments with (or without) imaging at a few months or years of interval. Nevertheless, such a follow-up is not always without any risk since, for instance, patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma who received more than 8 CT scans have a probability for secondary primary malignancies twice greater than those who received less than 8.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kahl BS, Armitage JO, Redberg R. CT use in NHL patients increase cancer risk, 19th Congress of the European Hematology 67 Association (EHA): 2014 Abstract BSSUB-3488

    Google Scholar 

  2. Masters GA, Temin S, Azzoli CG et al (2015) Systemic therapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 33:3488–3515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Meregaglia M, Cairns J (2015) Economic evaluations of follow-up strategies for cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the literature. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes 15(6):913–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Walsh GL, O’Connor M, Willis KM et al (1995) Is follow-up of lung cancer patients after resection medically indicated and cost-effective? Ann Thorac Surg 60:1563–1570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Westeel V, Choma D, Clement F et al (2000) Relevance of an intensive postoperative follow-up after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1185–1190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Selby JV, Beal AC, Frank L (2012) The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA 307:1583–1584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Basch E, Artz D, Dulko D et al (2005) Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:3552–3561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Denis F, Viger L, Charron A et al (2014) Detecting lung cancer relapse using self-evaluation forms weekly filled at home: the sentinel follow-up. Support Care Cancer 22:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Denis F, Viger L, Charron A et al (2014) Detection of lung cancer relapse using self-reported symptoms transmitted via an internet web-application: pilot study of the sentinel follow-up. Support Care Cancer 22:1467–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Denis F, Yossi S, Septans AL et al (2017) Improving survival in patient treated for a lung cancer using self-evaluated symptoms reported via a web-application. Am J Clin Oncol 40(5):464–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Denis F, Lethrosne C, Pourel N et al (2017) Randomized trial comparing a web-mediated follow-up to routine surveillance in lung cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 109(9). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx029

  12. Bakitas MA, Tosteson TD, Li Z et al (2015) Early versus delayed initiation of concurrent palliative oncology care: patient outcomes in the ENABLE III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 33:1438–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG et al (2015) Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34:557–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Basch E (2017) Patient-reported outcomes—harnessing patients’ voices to improve clinical care. NEJM 376:105–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ironmonger L, Ohuma E, Ormiston-Smith N et al (2015) An evaluation of the impact of large-scale interventions to raise public awareness of a lung cancer symptom. Br J Cancer 112:207–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrice Denis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Denis, F. (2019). Updated Technology and Early Detection of Cancers: Pulmonary, Breast, Colon, and Prostate. In: Michel, JP. (eds) Prevention of Chronic Diseases and Age-Related Disability. Practical Issues in Geriatrics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96529-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96529-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96528-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96529-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics