Skip to main content

The Sense and Nonsense in Planning Ahead: The Unanticipated Turns in Ethnographies on Crime and Drug Dealing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Doing Ethnography in Criminology

Abstract

It is generally assumed that detailed planning of the research process and anticipating remote, possible scenarios will lead to success with our research studies and potentially minimize risks. Detailed planning is often required by research ethics boards, dissertation committees, and potential funding agencies. However, in this chapter, I argue that good ethnographic studies often depend on happenstance and unanticipated turns. Much of what happens in ethnographic work is based on chance encounters and circumstances we cannot predict beforehand. In this chapter, I describe some of the ways my own 5-year-long ethnographic work on second-generation immigrant drug dealers in Germany took unexpected turns and did not play out the way I, or my professors, had anticipated. Ultimately, I argue that while preparation is obviously useful, in reality much of what will happen in ethnographic research depends on trial and error and unfolds in unexpected ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To that end, it is important to point out that German universities had no research ethics board at the time, so there were no official guidelines that could have posed restrictions on me or provided some guidance.

  2. 2.

    They called me “Bullock” given my first name is the same as the Hollywood’s actress’s name “Sandra Bullock.”

  3. 3.

    All names are pseudonyms.

  4. 4.

    Putting risk into perspective, I believe that almost at any point during my own research, I was at a higher risk of being sexually assaulted when going into a bar with complete strangers than being around the young men who grew protective of me. The greatest risk I probably faced during my fieldwork was when driving to my fieldsite on the German Autobahn and risking a car accident. Likewise, unanticipated risks probably dominated in the research process. When I talk about my research, people automatically assume that the greatest risks for me were either to get into a violent altercation during a drug transaction or the sexual risks of getting assaulted given that my participants were hypermasculine males. However, more mundane forms of risks were much more prominent. For example, there was often the chance that I might be in a car accident because one of the guys I was driving around who was high on cocaine would try to take the steering wheel, something which was a much greater risk than being hurt in a violent drug transaction.

References

  • Adler, P. (1993). Wheeling and dealing. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgois, P. (2003). In search of respect: Selling crack in El Barrio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucerius, S. (2007). What else should I do—Cultural influences on the drug trade of young migrants in Germany. Journal of Drug Issues, 37, 673–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucerius, S. (2008). Drug dealers between Islamic values, everyday life in Germany and criminal activity. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 3, 246–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucerius, S. (2013). Becoming a trusted outsider - Gender, ethnicity, and inequality in ethnographic research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 42, 690–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucerius, S. (2014). Unwanted – Muslim immigrants, dignity, and drug dealing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bucerius, S. and Urbanik M. (2018). When crime is a “Young Man’s Game” and the ethnographer is a woman: Gendered researcher experiences in two different contexts. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241618785225

  • Contreras, R. (2013). Stick-up kids. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. London: Routledge Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, R. (1986). Remaining an outsider: Membership as a threat to research rapport. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 14, 409–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, L. (1997). Sexed work. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra M. Bucerius .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bucerius, S.M. (2018). The Sense and Nonsense in Planning Ahead: The Unanticipated Turns in Ethnographies on Crime and Drug Dealing. In: Rice, S., Maltz, M. (eds) Doing Ethnography in Criminology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96316-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96316-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96315-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96316-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics