Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Alien Planktonic Species in the Marine Realm: What Do They Mean for Ecosystem Services Provision?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Ecosystem Services

  • 2919 Accesses

Abstract

Biodiversity, which in its simplest form is defined as the number of species in a system and their abundance, is considered vital for ecosystem stability [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Begon M, Townsend CR, Harper JL. Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems. 4th ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He J-S, Nakashizuka T, Rafaelli D, et al. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett. 2015;9:1146–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yool A, Tyrell T. Role of diatoms in regulating the ocean’s silicon cycle. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2003;17:1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiltshire KH, Kraberg A, Bartsch I, Boersma M, Heinz-Dieter F, Freund J, et al. Helgoland roads: 45 years of change in the North Sea. Estuar Coast. 2010;33:295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eurostat. Eurostat regional yearbook 2011: coastal regions. Luxembourg: Europäische Union; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime JP, Hector A, et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science. 2001;294:804–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Katsanevakis S, Gatto F, Zenetos A, Cardoso AC. How many marine aliens in Europe? Manag Biol Invasion. 2013;4(1):37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway. http://www.europe-aliens.org. Accessed 23 Oct 2017.

  9. Gollasch SD, Haydar D, Minchin D, Wolff WJ, Reise K. Introduced aquatic species of the North Sea coasts and adjacent brackish waters. In: Rilov G, Crooks JA, editors. Biological invasions in marine ecosystems. Ecological studies (analysis and synthesis), vol. 204. Berlin: Springer; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hajdu S, Pertola S, Kuosa H. Prorocentrum minimum (Dinophyceae) in the Baltic Sea: morphology, occurrence—a review. Harmful Algae. 2005;4:471–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaczmarska I, Ehrman JM. High colonization and propagule pressure by ship ballast as a vector for the diatom genus Pseudo-nitzschia. Manag Biol Invasion. 2015;6:31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jansen S. Copepods grazing on Coscinodiscus wailesii: a question of size? Helgol Mar Res. 2008;62(3):251–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willeman L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex. 2010;7(3):260–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gahzoul J. Recognising the complexities of ecosystem management and the ecosystem service concept. Gaia. 2007;16(3):215–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwerdtner Máñez K, Krause G, Ring I, Glaser M. The Gordian knot of mangrove conservation: disentangling the role of scale, services and benefits. Glob Environ Chang. 2014;28:120–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ. 2009;68:643–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Global biodiversity outlook 3. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  19. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: European Commission; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  20. TEEB. Why value the oceans? A discussion paper. 2012. http://www.teebweb.org/media/2013/10/2013-Why-Value-the-Oceans-Discussion-Paper.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2017.

  21. Cranford PJ, Kamermanns P, Krause G, Mazurié J, Buck BH, Dolmer P, et al. An ecosystem-based framework for the integrated evaluation and management of bivalve aquaculture impacts. Aquacul Environ Interact. 2012;2:193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Biggs HC, Rogers KH. An adaptive system to link science, monitoring and management in practice. In: du Toit JT, Rogers KH, Biggs HC, editors. The Kruger experience: ecology and management of Savannah heterogeneity. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2003. p. 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gillson L, Duffin KI. Thresholds of potential concern as benchmarks in the management of African savannahs. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;362:309–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsuyama Y, Shumway S. Impacts of harmful algal blooms on shellfisheries aquaculture. In: Burnell G, Allan G, editors. New technologies in aquaculture. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009. p. 580–609.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Conover RJ. Interrelations between microzooplankton and other planktonic organisms. Ann Inst Oceanogr. 1982;58(S):31–6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reguera B, Riobo P, Rodriguez F, Diaz PA, Pizarro G, Paz B, et al. Dinophysis toxins: causative organisms, distribution and fate in shellfish. Mar Drugs. 2014;12:394–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Berdalet E, Fleming LE, Gowen R, Davidson K, Hess P, Backer LC, et al. Marine harmful algal blooms, human health and wellbeing: challenges and opportunities in the 21st century. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315415001733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Johns DG, Edwards M, Greve W, SJohn AWG. Increasing prevalence of the marine cladoceran Penilia avirostris (Dana, 1852). Helgol Mar Res. 2005;59(3):214–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bilio M, Niermann U. Is the comb jelly really to blame for it all? Mnemiopsis leidyi and the ecological concerns about the Caspian sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004;269:173–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Knowler D. Reassessing the costs of biological invasion: Mnemiopsis lediyi in the Black Sea. Ecol Econ. 2005;52:187–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett. 2009;12:1394–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kraberg AC, Carstens K, Peters S, Tilly K, Wiltshire KH. The diatom Mediopyxis helysia at Helgoland Roads: a success story? Helgol Mar Res. 2012;66:463–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Edwards M, John AWG, Johns DG, Reid PC. Case history and persistence of the non-indigenous diatom Coscinodiscus wailesii in the north-east Atlantic. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2001;81:207–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Knapp S, Schweiger O, Kraberg A, Asmus H, Asmus R, Brey T, et al. Do drivers of biodiversity change differ in importance across marine and terrestrial systems—or is it just different research communities’ perspectives. Sci Total Environ. 2016;574:191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Alfred-Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Helgoland, Germany

    Alexandra Kraberg

  2. Division of Climate Sciences, Alfred Wegener Institute, Bremerhaven, Germany

    Gesche Krause

Authors
  1. Alexandra Kraberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gesche Krause
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra Kraberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecosystem Services, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Leipzig, Germany

    Matthias Schröter

  2. Department of Ecosystem Services, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Leipzig, Germany

    Aletta Bonn

  3. Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Halle, Germany

    Stefan Klotz

  4. Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Leipzig, Germany

    Ralf Seppelt

  5. Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Halle, Germany

    Cornelia Baessler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kraberg, A., Krause, G. (2019). Alien Planktonic Species in the Marine Realm: What Do They Mean for Ecosystem Services Provision?. In: Schröter, M., Bonn, A., Klotz, S., Seppelt, R., Baessler, C. (eds) Atlas of Ecosystem Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96229-0_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation