Skip to main content

Politics of #LoSha: Using Naming and Shaming as a Feminist Tool on Facebook

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter examines the new feminist intervention in India against sexual harassment (SH) through the online weapon of anonymously listing sexual offenders. The publication of the list on Facebook—known as the List of Shame (or #LoSha)—was inspired by the #metoo campaign following the Hollywood Weinstein affair and was composed through a collection of first-hand survivor narratives. A list of 70 names of alleged academic sexual offenders was first shared by a lawyer based in the US, and became viral on Facebook. This chapter will look at how this campaign used naming as a risk-taking tool to point at the lack of institutional frameworks within academic spaces. In doing so, it successfully used the online space of Facebook to create a feminist debate around the issue of sexual harassment transcending geographical and hierarchical barriers and to raise questions regarding the viability of the established feminist recourses against SH.

Using the methodological tool of situated critique (Bannerji, Thinking Through: Essays on Feminism, Marxism, and Anti-Racism. Toronto: Women’s Press, 1995), in this chapter I will utilize my own experience of participating in the list as well as in the larger feminist debate to discuss the politics of risk-taking and solidarity and the implications of list-activism. In doing so, it has re-established the role of cyberfeminism (Daniels, Women’s Studies Quarterly, 37 (1 & 2): 101–124, 2009) in India and surfaced a new intersectional autocritique of the academia based on caste, class and gender. Though questions regarding the method remain, the use of Facebook for providing survivors a voice with anonymity promises new boundaries of empowerment and fear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Savarna refers to those belonging to the upper castes in the hierarchical caste system practised in India. Avarna refers to those in the population who are considered outside the caste system, such as the Dalits and untouchables.

  2. 2.

    One of the accused sexual harassers in the list, who was subsequently found guilty by his university committee, was a founding member of this blog, though no mention was made of it in the statement. In ensuing debates in the comments section, questions were raised about this absence of any declaration of association. For more, see Menon (2017) comments section.

  3. 3.

    For an overall summation of the two sides of the spectrum of this debate, see Roy (2017), Chadha (2017) and others in the EPW Engage article series, “Power and Relationships in Academia”.

  4. 4.

    For a elaborated foray into the history of the Indian women’s movement, please see documented history, The History of Doing by Radha Kumar (1989), Women’s Studies in India: A Reader edited by Mary E. John (2008) and The Issues at Stake: Theory and Practice in the Contemporary Women’s Movement in India by Nandita Gandhi and Nandita Shah (1992).

  5. 5.

    I use the term “victim” here to point at the pleasurable narrations of incidents of sexual violence which imposes the victim role on the survivor, and the portrayal of media of the survivors in that light.

  6. 6.

    Even though the Sexual Harassment Guidelines 2013 ensures anonymity to the complainants, this is hardly the case in reality. My access to and participation in the student communities of Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi University and Ambedkar University Delhi in Delhi has always revealed to me the identity of the complainants, as it did to many others. This affects sexual harassment survivors’ decision to approach the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) and is contingent on whether they are ready to face the implications of identity revelation.

  7. 7.

    See, for example, Fernandez et al. (2003), Kolko et al. (2000) for a feminist and race critique of political potential of cyberspaces.

  8. 8.

    The #MeToo campaign was also started by black activist Tarana Burke.

  9. 9.

    Girls in Dhabas is a primary example of our cultural contextual familiarity transcending limitations of borders online. An online campaign started in Pakistan demanding women’s access to public spaces (dhaba literally means a roadside food stall) and it had soon gained popularity in India as well.

  10. 10.

    See in particular Shiv Visvanathan’s (2018) essay and Priyamvada Gopal’s (2018) rebuttal to it.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arpita Chakraborty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chakraborty, A. (2019). Politics of #LoSha: Using Naming and Shaming as a Feminist Tool on Facebook. In: Ging, D., Siapera, E. (eds) Gender Hate Online. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96226-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics