Abstract
This chapter introduces a theoretical framework that interconnects the concepts of personal networks, transnationalism, and social support. Social support and transnationalism are not only administered through the flow of activities and resources, but are also influenced by the network of relationships themselves. Transnationalism proposes a view of how people have connections in two or more countries, for example in both their home country and their new country of residence. They feel allegiances to both, wherein the nation states become less relevant. The concept of personal community plays a crucial role when examining transnational social formations in international students’ networks. Social support exchange is examined through the structure of social networks and relations between actors. This chapter discusses certain important attributes of network members such as geographical proximity and support exchange.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The four different network generators measuring four different types of social support were as follows:
-
1.
Emotional support
Whom did you discuss important personal matters with in the last three months (for example, talking with someone when you were depressed, explaining your problems, or expressing your happiness)?
-
2.
Instrumental s upport
Who are the people you asked for help in the last three months (for instance, to borrow a small amount of money or a household item, or even to ask for help with small jobs like photocopying or taking care of the house when you’re absent)?
-
3.
Informational support
Who are the people you have asked for advice in the last three months (for instance, asked assistance in accessing information, asked opinion or information regarding your stay or shared professional decisions)?
-
4.
Social companionship
Who are the people you enjoyed socialising with in the last three months (spent time chatting, played games, went for a walk, watched a video/movie, or even pursued a hobby)?
-
1.
- 2.
The question used to elicit reciprocal support ties: I would like to know how important you were in his/her life and whether you helped or provided support. Here are some activities/situations.
-
Name 1 ……… discussed/shared a personal matter with me
-
Name 1 ……… borrowed money or sought practical help from me
-
Name 1 ……… asked my opinion in making an important decision
-
Name 1 ……… socialised/spent leisure time with me
-
References
Altman, I. (1973). Reciprocity of interpersonal exchange. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 3(2), 249–261.
Appadurai, A. (Ed.). (2001). Globalization (Vol. 2). Duke University Press.
Barnes, J. A. (1954). Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations, 7(1), 39–58.
Bilecen, B. (2014). International student mobility and transnational friendships. Palgrave Macmillan.
Boase, J. (2006). The strength of Internet ties. In Pew Internet & American life project.
Burt, R. S. (1982). Toward a structural theory of action: Network models of social structure, perception, and action. Academic Press.
Burt, R. S. (1984). Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks, 6(4), 293–339.
Campbell, K. E., & Lee, B. A. (1991). Name generators in surveys of personal networks. Social Networks, 13(3), 203–221.
Caplan, G. (1976). The family as a support system. In G. Caplan & M. Killilea (Eds.), Support system and mutual help: Multidisciplinary explorations (pp. 19–36). New York: Grune and Stratton.
Caplan, R. D., Cobb, S., & French, J. R. (1975). Relationships of cessation of smoking with job stress, personality, and social support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 211.
Chua, V., Madej, J., & Wellman, B. (2011). Personal communities: The world according to me. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 101–115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38(5), 300–314.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310.
Dahinden, J. (2009). Are we all transnationals now? Network transnationalism and transnational subjectivity: The differing impacts of globalization on the inhabitants of a small Swiss city. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(8), 1365–1386.
Durkheim, E. (1964). The Division of labour in society. New York: Free Press.
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
Faist, T. (2004). Social space. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social theory (pp. 331–332). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Faist, T. (2009). Transnationalization and development: Toward an alternative agenda. Social Analysis, 53(3), 38.
Featherstone, M. (1993). Global and local cultures. In J. Bird et al. (Eds.), Mapping the futures: Local cultures, global change (pp. 169–187). London and New York: Routledge.
Fischer, C. S. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. University of Chicago Press.
Fischer, C. S. (1984). The urban experience. Harcourt.
Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 201–233.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
Hall, A., & Wellman, B. (1985). Social networks and social support. In S. Cohen & L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health. New York: Academic Press.
Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2011). Concepts and measures for basic network analysis. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 340–369). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hogan, B. (2009). From each according to media? Testing Wellman’s theory of networked individualism.
Homans, G. C. (1961). Human behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
Kennedy, P. M., & Cohen, R. (2007). Global sociology (p. 550). New York University Press.
Levitt, P., & Schiller, N. G. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1002–1039.
Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63(2), 482–501.
Mau, S. (2010). Social transnationalism: Lifeworlds beyond the nation-state. Routledge.
Mazzucato, V., & Schans, D. (2011). Transnational families and the well-being of children: Conceptual and methodological challenges. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(4), 704–712.
McCabe, J. M. (2016). Connecting in college: How friendship networks matter for academic and social success. University of Chicago Press.
McCarty, C., Gamper, M., Lubbers, M., & Molina, J. L. (2011). Migration and networks. In G. A. Barnett (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social networks (Vol. 1). Sage.
McEwen, R. N. (2010). A world more intimate: Exploring the role of mobile phones in maintaining and extending social networks (Doctoral dissertation).
Molina, J. L., Petermann, S., & Herz, A. (2012a). Defining and measuring transnational fields. Institut zur Erforschung Multireligiöser und Multiethnischer Gesellschaften.
Molina, J. L., Lozares, C., & Lubbers, M. J. (2012b). The geographical distribution of the personal networks of people living in Catalonia: A dual society. GRAFO Working Papers, 1, 1–19.
Mouw, T., Chavez, S., Edelblute, H., & Verdery, A. (2014). Binational social networks and assimilation: A test of the importance of transnationalism. Social Problems, 61(3), 329–359.
Pries, L. (Ed.). (2013). New transnational social spaces: International migration and transnational companies in the early twenty-first century. Routledge.
Schiller, N. G., Basch, L., & Blanc, C. S. (1995). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 48–63.
Schiller, N. G., & Fouron, G. E. (1999). Terrains of blood and nation: Haitian transnational social fields. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 340–366.
Simmel, G. (1902). The number of members as determining the sociological form of the group. I. American Journal of Sociology, 8(1), 1–46.
Song, F. W. (2009). Virtual communities: Bowling alone, online together. Peter Lang.
Song, L., Son, J., & Lin, N. (2011). Social support. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social network analysis (pp. 116–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thoits, P. A. (1982). Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical problems in studying social support as a buffer against life stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 145–159.
Tönnies, F. (1963). Community and Society. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Gemeinschaft und. Gemeinschaft, originally published in German, 1887.
Vaux, A. (1988). Social support: Theory, research, and intervention. Praeger Publishers.
Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. Routledge.
Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society. In Conceptual exposition (Vol. 1, pp. 956–1005).
Wellman, B. (1979). The community question: The intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology, 84(5), 1201–1231.
Wellman, B. (1988). The community question re-evaluated. In M. P. Smith (Ed.), Power, community and the city (pp. 81–107). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Wellman, B. (1992). Which types of ties and networks provide what kinds of social support. Advances in Group Processes, 9(1992), 207–235.
Wellman, B. (2011). Studying the Internet through the ages. In M. Consalvo & C. Ess (Eds.), The handbook of Internet studies (pp. 17–23). Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Wellman, B., & Potter, S. (1999). The elements of personal communities. In B. Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the global village (pp. 49–82). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 730–780.
Wiles, J. (2008). Sense of home in a transnational social space: New Zealanders in London. Global Networks, 8(1), 116–137.
Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation–state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kanagavel, R. (2019). From a Network Theory to a Social Phenomenon. In: The Social Lives of Networked Students. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96199-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96199-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96198-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96199-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)