Skip to main content

Spatial Patterns of Regional Income Inequality Then and Now

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 536 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Economic History ((PEHS))

Abstract

In this chapter an important element characteristic of territorial inequality is examined: the presence of geographical patterns, that is, the grouping of neighbouring regions into clusters of wealth or poverty. The descriptive evidence provided by the maps is supplemented with spatial autocorrelation statistics to test for the presence of spatial clustering. The analysis aims to identify when exactly the geographical patterns that characterize regional inequality in Spain today took shape. Then some hypotheses as to the causes are established. Finally, the chapter analyses whether the clusters of poor or rich regions continue uninterrupted beyond national borders to include regions of Portugal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Subindex i denotes the province being studied, while j denotes the remaining provinces.

  2. 2.

    An in-depth analysis of regional inequality in Iberia can be found in Tirado and Badia (2014).

  3. 3.

    This interpretation is provided in Rosés et al. (2010), for example.

  4. 4.

    This methodology has been used extensively in economic history: Wolf (2007) analysed reunified Poland during the interwar years after the First World War; Crafts and Mulatu (2005, 2006) studied the Victorian period in Britain; Klein and Crafts (2012) applied the approach when reexamining the manufacturing belt in the US between 1880 and 1920; Ronsse and Rayp (2016) studied the determinants of manufacturing location in Belgium between 1896 and 1961; Nikolic (2018) focuses on interwar Yugoslavia; and Missiaia (2018) analyses Italy in the period 1871–1911.

  5. 5.

    Combes et al. (2011) carried out a similar analysis for France between 1860, 1930 and 2000. The parameters they estimated suggested that doubling employment density in a French département would result in labour productivity gains of around 5 per cent.

  6. 6.

    This exercise thus contributed to the existing theoretical and empirical NEG debate on the effects of international integration on countries’ internal geography (Hanson 1997; Krugman and Livas-Elizondo 1996; Crozet and Koenig 2004). A similar long-term analysis for Italy can be found in A’Hearn and Venables (2011).

References

  • A’Hearn, B., & Venables, A. J. (2011). Internal geography and external trade: Regional disparities in Italy, 1861–2011. Quaderni di Storia Economica, 12, Bank of Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azariadis, C., & Stachurski, J. (2005). Poverty traps. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (Vol. 1, pp. 295–384). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., & Martin, P. (2004). Agglomeration and regional growth. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2671–2711). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brülhart, M., & Sbergami, F. (2009). Agglomeration and growth: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(1), 48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone, A. (2002). Agglomeration effects in Europe. European Economic Review, 46(2), 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone, A., & Hall, R. E. (1996). Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review, 86(1), 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combes, P. P., Lafourcade, M., Thisse, J. F., & Toutain, J. C. (2011). The rise and fall of spatial inequalities in France: A long-run perspective. Explorations in Economic History, 48(2), 243–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crafts, N., & Mulatu, A. (2005). What explains the location of industry in Britain, 1871–1931? Journal of Economic Geography, 5(4), 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crafts, N., & Mulatu, A. (2006). How did the location of industry respond to falling transport costs in Britain before World War I? The Journal of Economic History, 66(3), 575–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozet, M. (2004). Do migrants follow market potentials? An estimation of a New Economic Geography model. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4), 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozet, M., & Koenig, P. (2004). Trade liberalization and the internal geography of countries. In T. Mayer & M. Mucchielli (Eds.), Multinational firms’ location and economic geography (pp. 91–109). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R., & Weinstein, D. E. (1999). Economic geography and regional production structure: An empirical investigation. European Economic Review, 43(2), 379–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R., & Weinstein, D. E. (2003). Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: An empirical test. Journal of International Economics, 59(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díez-Minguela, A., Martinez-Galarraga, J., & Tirado, D. A. (2016). Why did Spanish regions not converge before the Civil War? Agglomeration economies and (regional) growth revisited. Revista de Historia Económica/Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, 34(3), 417–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The spatial economy: Cities, regions and international trade. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, G. H. (1997). Increasing returns, trade and the regional structure of wages. Economic Journal, 107, 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, G. H. (2005). Market potential, increasing returns and geographic concentration. Journal of International Economics, 67(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (1995). Expansion of markets and the geographic distribution of economic activities: The trends in U.S. regional manufacturing structure, 1860–1987. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 881–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A., & Crafts, N. (2012). Making sense of the manufacturing belt: Determinants of U.S. industrial location, 1880–1920. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(4), 775–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P., & Livas-Elizondo, R. (1996). Trade policy and the Third World metropolis. Journal of Development Economics, 49(1), 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P., & Ottaviano, G. (1999). Growing locations: Industry location in a model of endogenous growth. European Economic Review, 43(2), 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Galarraga, J. (2012). The determinants of industrial location in Spain, 1856–1929. Explorations in Economic History, 49(2), 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Galarraga, J., Paluzie, E., Pons, J., & Tirado, D. A. (2008). Agglomeration and labour productivity in Spain over the long term. Cliometrica, 2(3), 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Galarraga, J., Tirado, D. A., & González-Val, R. (2015). Market potential and regional economic growth in Spain (1860–1930). European Review of Economic History, 19(4), 335–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midelfart-Knarvik, K. H., Overman, H., Redding, S., & Venables, A. J. (2002). The location of European industry. In European Commission (Ed.), European economy: European integration and the functioning of product markets, 2/2002 (pp. 213–269). Brussels: Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Missiaia, A. (2018). Old patterns die hard: Regional aspects of the Italian industrialization in the long run. Paper presented at the Workshop on Economic Geography of Long-Run Industrialization, at the International Institute of Social History (IISH), 22–23 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolic, S. (2018). Determinants of industrial location: Kingdom of Yugoslavia in the interwar period. European Review of Economic History, 22(1), 101–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano, G., & Pinelli, D. (2006). Market potential and productivity: Evidence from Finnish regions. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(5), 636–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pons, J., Paluzie, E., Silvestre, J., & Tirado, D. A. (2007). Testing the new economic geography: Migrations and industrial agglomerations in Spain. Journal of Regional Science, 47(2), 289–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. (1996). Twin Peaks: Growth and convergence in models of distribution dynamics. Economic Journal, 106(437), 1045–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. (1997). Empirics for growth and distribution: Stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs. Journal of Economic Growth, 2(1), 27–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronsse, S., & Rayp, G. (2016). What determined the location of industry in Belgium, 1896–1961? Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 46(3), 393–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosés, J. R. (2003). Why isn’t the whole of Spain industrialized? New economic geography and early industrialization, 1797–1910. The Journal of Economic History, 63(4), 995–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosés, J. R., Martinez-Galarraga, J., & Tirado, D. A. (2010). The upswing of regional income inequality in Spain (1860–1930). Explorations in Economic History, 47(2), 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirado, D. A., & Badia, M. (2014). New evidence on regional economic inequality in Iberia (1900–2000). Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 47(4), 180–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirado, D. A., Paluzie, E., & Pons, J. (2002). Economic integration and industrial location: The case of Spain before World War I. Journal of Economic Geography, 2(3), 343–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirado, D. A., Pons, J., Paluzie, E., & Martinez-Galarraga, J. (2013). Trade policy and wage gradients: Evidence from a protectionist turn. Cliometrica, 7(3), 295–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, N. (2007). Endowments vs. market potential: What explains the relocation of industry after the Polish reunification in 1918? Explorations in Economic History, 44(1), 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Díez-Minguela, A., Martinez-Galarraga, J., Tirado-Fabregat, D.A. (2018). Spatial Patterns of Regional Income Inequality Then and Now. In: Regional Inequality in Spain. Palgrave Studies in Economic History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96110-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96110-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96109-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96110-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics