Skip to main content

The Growth of Political Advisory Staff

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The End of Whitehall?
  • 245 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will examine the causes and consequences of recruiting an increasing number of political staff from outside the permanent civil service. The evidence is ‘politicisation’ has grown in recent decades as a consequence of the influx of appointees. The threat posed to the traditional Whitehall model from the escalation of partisanship is significant, upending the once sacred civil service ‘monopoly’ over policy advice. The debate is nevertheless more nuanced than depicted by images of shadowy special advisers. The nature of the policy process has changed radically over the last thirty years. The growth of policy-relevant research, the impact of new technology, and the demand for ‘user-driven’ public services led Ministers to seek varieties of specialist advice from outside the permanent bureaucracy. Politicisation ought not to be confused with the legitimate search for expertise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 9.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 17.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Prime Minister Harold Wilson cited in https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/publications/tabs/unit-publications/158 Accessed 18th January 2018.

  2. 2.

    Cited in https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/publications/tabs/unit-publications/158 Accessed 18th January 2018.

  3. 3.

    Cited in https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmpubadm/253/253.pdf Accessed 2nd February 2018.

  4. 4.

    https://www.google.com/?client=safari&channel=ipad_bm Accessed 22nd February 2018.

  5. 5.

    https://www.google.co.uk/?client=safari&channel=ipad_bm&gws_rd=cr&dcr=0&ei=V26WWp7MA8mdsAeX3r3ACg Accessed 21st February 2018.

  6. 6.

    Interview with Whitehall Think-Tank Director, 30th September 2016.

  7. 7.

    http://www.bettergovernmentinitiative.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Civil-Service-final.pdf Accessed 6th February 2018.

  8. 8.

    http://www.civilservant.org.uk/spads-history_and_comment.html Accessed 2nd February 2018.

  9. 9.

    http://www.bettergovernmentinitiative.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Civil-Service-final.pdf Accessed 8th February 2018.

  10. 10.

    https://www.civilserviceworld.com/profile-peter-hennessy Accessed 15th December 2017.

  11. 11.

    Interview with a former departmental permanent secretary, 6th April 2018.

  12. 12.

    https://www.google.co.uk/?client=safari&channel=ipad_bm&gws_rd=cr&dcr=0&ei=Bn2WWvONBIPTkgWbnYmoCQ Accessed 20th February 2018.

  13. 13.

    https://www.democraticaudit.com/2018/01/23/just-how-special-are-special-advisers-within-the-uk-civil-service/ Accessed 18th December 2018.

  14. 14.

    Cited in http://www.civilservant.org.uk/spads-history_and_comment.html Accessed 22nd January 2018.

  15. 15.

    http://www.civilservant.org.uk/library/2013_SpAds_and_Misconduct.pdf Accessed 5th February 2018.

  16. 16.

    Interview with Whitehall Think-Tank research fellow, 12th December 2017.

  17. 17.

    https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldhansrd/text/140116-0001.htm Accessed 6th February 2018.

  18. 18.

    https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldhansrd/text/140116-0001.htm Accessed 6th February 2018.

  19. 19.

    http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmpubadm/c644-i/c644i.pdf.

  20. 20.

    http://www.bettergovernmentinitiative.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Civil-Service-final.pdf Accessed 18th December 2017.

  21. 21.

    Interview with a former departmental permanent secretary, 6th April 2018.

  22. 22.

    Interview with a former departmental permanent secretary, 6th April 2018.

  23. 23.

    Interview with former Head of the Cabinet Office Strategy Unit (PMSU ), February 2012.

  24. 24.

    https://www.google.co.uk/?client=safari&channel=ipad_bm&gws_rd=cr&dcr=0&ei=xFiqWr2OLoifgAahh4iwDA Accessed 11th March 2018.

  25. 25.

    https://www.google.co.uk/?client=safari&channel=ipad_bm&gws_rd=cr&dcr=0&ei=xFiqWr2OLoifgAahh4iwDA Accessed 12th March 2018.

  26. 26.

    Interview with a departmental permanent secretary, 19th October 2016.

  27. 27.

    Interview with a departmental permanent secretary, 19th October 2016.

  28. 28.

    Interview with a departmental permanent secretary, 19th October 2016.

  29. 29.

    Interview with former Head of a Whitehall think-tank, 30th September 2016.

  30. 30.

    Thomas Balogh’s famous essay published in 1959, ‘The Apotheosis of the Dilettante’, set the tone several decades ago by claiming that civil servants in Britain had been educated in such a way as to develop, ‘a purposefully useless, somewhat dilettante erudition, which would keep dangerous thoughts well away’ (Balogh 1959: 112).

  31. 31.

    https://www.ippr.org/publications/innovations-in-governmentinternational-perspectives-on-civil-service-reform Accessed 11th March 2018.

  32. 32.

    Transcript, David Laws, March 2016, Ministers reflect Archive, Institute for Government, Online: http://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/ministers-reflect/person/david-laws/ Accessed 30 September 2016.

  33. 33.

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sir-humphrey-needs-to-learn-whos-the-boss-rjz96g53f Accessed 2nd February 2018.

  34. 34.

    Transcript, David Laws, March 2016, Ministers reflect Archive, Institute for Government, Online: http://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/ministers-reflect/person/david-laws/ Accessed 30 September 2016.

  35. 35.

    Transcript, David Laws, March 2016, Ministers reflect Archive, Institute for Government, Online: http://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/ministers-reflect/person/david-laws/ Accessed 30 September 2016.

  36. 36.

    Interview with former Head of the Prime Minister’s Delivery Unit (PMDU), April 19th 2012.

  37. 37.

    Interview with a departmental special adviser, 20th October 2016.

  38. 38.

    Interview with Whitehall Think-Tank Director, 30th September 2016.

  39. 39.

    Interview with the former Head of the Cabinet Office Strategy Unit (PMSU ), February 16th 2012.

  40. 40.

    https://civilservicelearning.civilservice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/twelve_actions_report_web_accessible.pdf Accessed 16th March 2017.

  41. 41.

    Interview with a former departmental permanent secretary, 19th October 2016.

  42. 42.

    Cited in https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmpubadm/253/253.pdf Accessed 2nd February 2018.

  43. 43.

    Interview with Whitehall Think-Tank research fellow, 12th December 2017.

  44. 44.

    http://mikebracken.com/blog/on-policy-and-delivery/ Accessed 15 December 2017.

  45. 45.

    https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/blog/problems-universal-credit Accessed 12th December 2017.

  46. 46.

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contestable-policy-fund Accessed 5th September 2016.

  47. 47.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2005/jul/27/Whitehall.uk Accessed 14th December 2017.

  48. 48.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/207237/Accountability_and_Responsiveness_in_the_SCS.pdf Accessed 5th September 2016.

  49. 49.

    Interview with former Treasury and Cabinet Office official, 11th January 2018.

  50. 50.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-s-first-use-of-contestable-policy-fund Accessed 12th January 2018. The review cost the Government £50,000; half was made available through the CPF; the remainder of the funding was provided by the Cabinet Office.

  51. 51.

    Cited in: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmpubadm/74/7406.htm Accessed 12th January 2018.

  52. 52.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/207237/Accountability_and_Responsiveness_in_the_SCS.pdf Accessed 12th January 2018.

  53. 53.

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/contestable-policy-fund Accessed 5th September 2016.

  54. 54.

    https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/opening_up%20policy%20making_final.pdf Accessed 20th December 2017.

  55. 55.

    https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/opening_up%20policy%20making_final.pdf Accessed 20th December 2017.

  56. 56.

    https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmpubadm/253/253.pdf Accessed 2nd February 2018.

  57. 57.

    Interview with former Head of a Whitehall think-tank, 30th September 2016.

  58. 58.

    Interview with a senior official in the Department for Education and the Ministry of Justice, 7th October 2016.

  59. 59.

    https://civilservant.org.uk/library/2014_IfG_Leading_Change.pdf Accessed 20th December 2017. Cited in Richardson 2017: 14.

  60. 60.

    https://www.ft.com/content/2517019c-b93a-11e5-bf7e-8a339b6f2164 Accessed 15th December 2017.

  61. 61.

    Interview with Whitehall Think-Tank Director, 30th September 2016.

  62. 62.

    Interview with Whitehall Think-Tank Director, 30th September 2016.

  63. 63.

    Interview with former departmental permanent secretary, 19th October 2016.

  64. 64.

    https://www.psa.ac.uk/insight-plus/making-better-use-evidence-government Accessed 18th January 2018.

  65. 65.

    Interview with former Head of the Number Ten Policy Unit, 12th February 2012.

  66. 66.

    Interview with former Head of the Number Ten Policy Unit, 12th February 2012.

  67. 67.

    Interview with a departmental special adviser, 20th October 2016.

  68. 68.

    https://www.civilserviceworld.com/articles/news/gus-attacks-outsourcing-policy-advice Accessed 15th December 2017.

Bibliography

  • Aucoin, P. (2012). New Political Governance in Westminster Systems: Impartial Public Administration and Management Performance at Risk. Governance, 25(2), 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakvis, H., & Jarvis, M. (Eds.). (2012). Introduction: Peter C. Aucoin: From New Public Management to New Political Governance. In From New Public Management to New Political Governance. McGill-Queens University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogh, T. (1959). The Apotheosis of the Dilettente. In H. Thomas (Ed.), Crisis in the Civil Service. London: Blond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (2006). The IPPR and Demos: Think-Tanks of the New Social Democracy. Political Quarterly, 77(2), 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blick, A. (2004). People Who Live in the Dark: The History of the Special Adviser in British Politics. London: Politico’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, P. (2002). New Labour and the Politics of Depoliticisation. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 3(2), 127–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, P. (2018). The UK Government’s Imaginative Use of Evidence to Make Policy. British Politics, Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The Managerial State. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, N. (2016). Politics: Between the Extremes. London: Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, J. (2013). Appointed Political Staffs and the Diversification of Policy Advisory Sources: Theory and Evidence from Canada. Policy and Society, 32(3), 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, J., & Halligan, J. (2015, July 1–4). Looking Back and Thinking Ahead: 30 Years of Policy Advisory System Scholarship. Prepared for T08P06 Comparing Policy Advisory Systems. International Conference on Public Policy. Catholic University of Sacro Cuore, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, J., & Howlett, M. (2012). Policy Formulation, Governance Shifts and Policy Influence: Location and Content in Policy Advisory Systems. Journal of Public Policy, 32(2), 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denham, A., & Garnett, M. (2006). What Works? British Think-Tanks and the ‘End of Ideology’. Political Quarterly, 77(2), 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, M. (2014, June 30). Speech to the Institute of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichbaum, C., & Shaw, R. (2007). Ministerial Advisers and the Politics of Policy-Making: Bureaucratic Permanence and Popular Control. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(4), 453–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraussen, B., & Halpin, D. (2016). Think Tanks and Strategic Policymaking: The Contribution of Think Tanks to Policy Advisory Systems. Policy Sciences, 50(1), 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gains, F., & Stoker, G. (2011). Special Advisers and the Transmission of Ideas from the Primeval Policy Soup. Policy and Politics, 39(4), 485–498(14).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouglas, A. (2016). Paper Drafted for Internal Use in View of the Preparation for a KU Leuven OT Project on ‘Policy Advice Utilisation in European Policy Advisory Systems’. KU Leuven Public Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouglas, A., & Brans, M. (2016, February 9). UK Extended Ministerial Offices: On the Road to Cabinetisation? London: Constitution Unit Blog. https://constitution-unit.com/2016/02/09/uk-extended-ministerial-offices-on-the-road-to-cabinetisation/

  • Grube, D. (2015). Responsibility to Be Enthusiastic? Public Servants and the Public Face of ‘Promiscuous Partisanship’. Governance, 28(3), 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H. M., Hall, D., & Mills, C. (2015). Consultants, Consultancy and Consultocracy in Education Policymaking in England. Journal of Education Policy, 30(4), 518–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddon, C. (2016). Developments in the Civil Service. In R. Heffernan, C. Hay, M. Russell, & P. Cowley (Eds.), Developments in British Politics 10. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halligan, J. (1995). Policy Advice and the Public Sector. In B. G. Peters & D. T. Savoie (Eds.), Governance in a Changing Environment (pp. 138–172). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, R. (2012). How the Coalition Works at the Centre. In R. Hazell & B. Yong (Eds.), The Politics of Coalition: How the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Government Works. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Government (HMG). (1968). The Civil Service: Report of the Committee Chaired by Lord Fulton. London: HMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Government (HMG). (2012). Civil Service Reform Plan. London: HMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, N. (2016). The Coalition’s Higher Education Reforms in England. Oxford Review of Education, 42(3), 330–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letwin, O. (2012, September 17). Why Mandarins Matter: Keynote Speech. London: Institute for Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys, C. (2006). The Cynical State. In The Socialist Register. London: Merlin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G., & Sturdy, A. (2017). The Role of Large Management Consultancy Firms in Global Public Policy. In D. Stone & K. Maloney (Eds.), Oxford Handbook on Global Public Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (2006). Thinking in Tanks: The Changing Ecology of Political Ideas. Political Quarterly, 77(2), 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. A. (1994). Bureaucracy and Public Economics. Vermont: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, M. (2017). Temporary Partisans, Tagged Officers or Impartial Professionals: Moving Between Ministerial Offices and Departments. Public Administration, 95(1), 407–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, E. (2010). Has the Whitehall Model Survived? International Journal of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 407–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2000). The Future of Governing (2nd ed.). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G., & Pierre, J. (2004). Politicisation of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G.-P., & Savoie, D. (1994). Civil Service Reform: Misdiagnosing the Patient. Public Administration Review, 54(5), 418–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, M. (2005). Memorandum to the Select Committee on Public Administration – Written Evidence. London: House of Commons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2011a). Everyday Life in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2011b). One-Way, Two-Way, or Dead-End Street: The British Influence on American Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 559–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, D., & Smith, M. (2016). The Westminster Model and the ‘Indivisibility of the Political and Economic Elite’: A Convenient Myth Whose Time Is up? Governance, 29(4), 499–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (2017). The Changing British Policy Style: From Governance to Government? British Politics, Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, J. (2013, June 19). Ministers Should Commission IPPR and Civil Service Advice in Parallel. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Martin, D. (1998). Les consultants et la réforme managérialiste de l’État en France et en Grande-Bretagne: vers l’émergence d’une ‘consultocratie’? Revue canadienne de science politique, 32(1), 41–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sausman, C., & Locke, R. (2004). The British Civil Service: Examining the Question of Politicisation. In G. B. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Politicisation of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective (pp. 101–124). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S. E., Russell, J., Parsons, W., & Greenhalgh, T. (2015). The View from Nowhere? How Think-Tanks Work to Shape Health Policy. Critical Policy Studies, 9(1), 58–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2006). Think-Tanks and Policy Analysis. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Methods and Politics (pp. 149–157). New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, C. (2016). Dynamics in the Dutch Policy Advisory System: Externalisation, Politicisation and the Legacy of Pillarisation. Policy Sciences, 50(1), 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, P. (2012). Departments: Ministers and the Civil Service. In R. Hazell & B. Yong (Eds.), The Politics of Coalition: How the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Government Works. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. New York: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong, B., & Hazell, R. (2014). Special Advisers: What They Do and Why They Matter. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Diamond, P. (2019). The Growth of Political Advisory Staff. In: The End of Whitehall?. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96101-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics