Skip to main content

Estimation Accuracy of Average Walking Speed by Acceleration Signals: Comparison Among Three Different Sensor Locations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Abstract

The ubiquity of wearable sensors now enables us to measure a user’s walking speed outside of a laboratory or clinical setting, during activities of daily living. However, this technology is recent, and researchers have yet to determine the locations on the body that produce the most accurate data from these sensors. This study aims to compare the accuracy of average walking speed estimation measured using acceleration data from three body landmarks: wrist, pelvis, and ankle. Estimation models are derived from the gait data of 247 healthy adults using stepwise linear multiple regression analyses. The absolute value of the within-participant mean of errors between actual average walking speed and estimated average walking speed is computed and compered across landmarks. The ankle is the most accurate locations from which to estimate average walking speeds from acceleration signals, whereas the wrist was the least accurate locations. Walking speed is an important measure of health and function, especially in older people, and accurately estimating walking speeds in daily life may be helpful in predicting health outcomes in the elderly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cesari M, Kritchevsky SB, Penninx BW et al (2005) Prognostic value of usual gait speed in well-functioning older people—results from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:1675–1680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Studenski S, Perera S, Wallace D et al (2003) Physical performance measures in the clinical setting. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:314–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fritz S, Lusardi M (2009) Walking speed: the sixth vital sign. J Geriatr Phys Ther 32(2):46–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Youdas JW, Hollman JH, Albers MJ et al (2006) Agreement between the GAITRite walkway system and a stopwatch-footfall count method for measurement of temporal and spatial gait parameters. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(12):1648–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang S, Li Q (2012) Inertial sensor-based methods in walking speed estimation: a systematic review. Sensors 12(5):6102–6116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Herren R, Sparti A, Aminian K et al (1999) The prediction of speed and incline in outdoor running in humans using accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31(7):1053–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schimpl M, Lederer C, Daumer M (2011) Development and validation of a new method to measure walking speed in free-living environments using the Actibelt® platform. PLoS ONE 6(8):e23080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zihajehzadeh S, Park EJ (2017) A Gaussian process regression model for walking speed estimation using a head-worn IMU. In: Conference proceedings of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 2345–2348

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zihajehzadeh S, Park EJ (2016) Regression model-based walking speed estimation using wrist-worn inertial sensor. PLoS ONE 11(10):e0165211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. ISO 7250-1:2017 (2017) Basic human body measurements for technological design—Part 1: Body measurement definitions and landmarks

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kobayashi Y, Hobara H, Matsushita S et al (2014) Key joint kinematic characteristics of the gait of fallers identified by principal component analysis. J Biomech 47(10):2424–2429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kobayashi Y, Hobara H, Heldoorn TA et al (2016) Age-independent and age-dependent sex differences in gait pattern determined by principal component analysis. Gait Posture 46:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Andrieu S et al (2009) Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health Aging 13(10):881–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants as well as Ms. Rika Ichimura, Ms. Yuko Kawai and Ms. Miho Ono for their support of data acquisition and analyses.

Conflict of Interest.

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest associated with this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiyuki Kobayashi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kobayashi, Y. et al. (2019). Estimation Accuracy of Average Walking Speed by Acceleration Signals: Comparison Among Three Different Sensor Locations. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 818. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96098-2_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics