Abstract
The rail driver workplace is full of challenges for effective health management, posing a significant threat to the sustainability of the industry. In Australia, train drivers undergo periodic health assessment as part of a nationally standardised approach to reducing sudden incapacitation risk; however, studies suggest that the current assessment protocol is not operating as effectively as they might. To improve this, there is a need to understand the experiences of drivers undergoing workplace health assessments, and how they engage with them.
Drawing on research of known barriers and enablers of positive health status, this study sought to examine train drivers’ perceptions and experiences of recurring organisational health assessments and how they subjectively engage with this process. Five focus groups with train drivers (n = 29) were held across four Australian rail organisations, seeking to gain their understanding of the National Standard and their attitudes towards health assessments. Transcript data were subjected to thematic analysis.
Preliminary findings identified four primary factors: drivers’ unmet information needs, low perceived assessment reliability and validity, need for psychological assessment and support, and the use of maladaptive assessment-threat avoidance strategies. This paper presents an overview of these preliminary findings and suggests that driver engagement with health assessment may be improved by proactively addressing these factors in occupational health initiatives and preventative interventions to tackle the growing problem of train driver health impairment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Hocking B (2006) The inquiry into the waterfall train crash: implications for medical examinations of safety-critical workers. Occup Health Saf 184(3):126–128
National Transport Commission (2012) National Standard for Health Assessment of Rail Safety Workers. Author, Melbourne
National Transport Commission (2017) National Standard for Health Assessment of Rail Safety Workers. Author, Melbourne
Mina R, Casolin A (2012) The Australian National Standard for rail workers five years on. Occup Med 62:642–647
Mina R, Casolin A (2007) National standard for health assessment of rail safety workers: the first year. Med J Aust 187(7):394–397
Colquhoun CP, Casolin A (2015) Impact of rail medical standard on obstructive sleep apnoea prevalence. Occup Med 66(1):62–68
Chapman J, Naweed A (2015) Health initiatives to target obesity in surface transport industries: review and implications for action. Evid Base 2:1–32
Naweed A, Trigg J, Allan M, Chapman J (2017) Working around it: rail drivers’ views on the barriers and enablers to managing workplace health. Int J Workplace Health Manag 10(6):475–490
Naweed A, Chapman J, Allan M, Trigg J (2017) It comes with the job: work organizational, job design, and self-regulatory barriers to improving the health status of train drivers. J Occup Environ Med 59(3):264–273
Lo SH, van Breukelen GJ, Peters G-JY, Kok G (2013) Proenvironmental travel behavior among office workers: a qualitative study of individual and organizational determinants. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 56:11–22
Nielsen JR, Hovmøller H, Blyth P-L, Sovacool BK (2015) Of “white crows” and “cash savers:” a qualitative study of travel behavior and perceptions of ridesharing in Denmark. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 78:113–123
Vaezipour A, Rakotonirainy A, Haworth N, Delhomme P (2017) Enhancing eco-safe driving behaviour through the use of in-vehicle human-machine interface: a qualitative study. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 100:247–263
Hafner RJ, Walker I, Verplanken B (2017) Image, not environmentalism: a qualitative exploration of factors influencing vehicle purchasing decisions. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 97:89–105
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18(1):59–82
Morgan DL (1997) Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Saldana J (2009) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles
Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101
Wasserman JA, Clair JM, Wilson KL (2009) Problematics of grounded theory: innovations for developing an increasingly rigorous qualitative method. Qual Res 9(3):355–381
Attride-Stirling J (2001) Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res 1(3):385–405
Vaughan D (1997) The challenger launch decision: risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. University of Chicago Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chapman, J., Trigg, J., Naweed, A. (2019). Safety for Industry, Threat for Drivers? Insights into the Current Utility of Heath Assessments for Rail. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 819. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_67
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_67
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96088-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96089-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)