Skip to main content

Readiness to Change: Perceptions of Safety Culture up and down the Supply Chain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 819))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Safety culture research tends to treat organisations as a single body, with less focus on understanding how perceptions vary in a multi stakeholder environment. One such example of a multi-stakeholder environment is a construction project. The success of safety interventions must be sensitive to the interfaces and relationships, and different perceptions, between Principal Contractors and their Supply Chain, particularly for Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs) that may have fundamentally different safety management systems and culture. This paper explores whether there is a difference in perception between project members. It tests whether perceptions are driven by a perceived hierarchy of greater maturity for Principal Contractors or whether different organisational layers of the project rate themselves highly in comparison to others, as a form of self enhancement. 17 workshops were undertaken across four different Principal Contractors, and their respective Supply Chains, comprising a total of 367 participants (Principal contractor n = 114; supply chain n = 253). Participants were asked to rate the safety culture maturity of their organisation and the safety culture maturity of the other group using Hudson’s safety culture maturity model. The results identified a significant difference in the perceived safety culture maturity of the Principal Contractor and Supply Chain, with Principal Contractors perceived by all parties as more mature than the supply chain. This suggests that the power structure across a project has more of an effect on perceptions than self-enhancement by any organizational type. The divergent power relationship between Principal Contractor and their Supply Chain may influence the reported levels of safety culture maturity for the project as a whole, and has a bearing on how safety culture interventions should be delivered to effect change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. DTI (2006) Construction statistics annual report 2006. The Stationary Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. HSE. HSE construction intelligence report - analysis of construction injury and ill health intelligence. Accessed 2009

    Google Scholar 

  3. HSE. http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/industry/construction/construction.pdf. Accessed 2015

  4. DTI (2010) Key performance indicators and benchmarking: construction industry KPI’s. The Stationary Office, London, Chap 16

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cullen Report (2000) The ladbroke grove rail inquiry. HSE Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flin R, Mearns K, O’Connor P, Bryden R (2000) Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. Saf Sci 34:177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oxford Brookes. http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/hr/project/pm_at_brookes/definition.html. Accessed 2011

  8. Health and Safety Authority: Clients in construction: best practice guidance. Health and Safety Authority, Metropolitan Building, James Joyce Street, Dublin http://www.hsa.ie/eng/Publications_and_Forms/Publications/Construction/Clients_in_Construction_Best_Practice_Guidance.pdf. Accessed 2009

  9. Bednarz J. One of our health & safety manager’s Speller Metcalfe. http://www.spellermetcalfe.com/blog/2015/health-safety-and-clients-responsibility. Accessed 2016

  10. Constructing Excellence (2004) Supply chain management, constructing excellence

    Google Scholar 

  11. DTI (2011 July) Structure of the construction industry. The Stationary Office, London, Chap 3

    Google Scholar 

  12. Office for National Statistics. http://www.ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/constructionindustry/datasets/constructionstatisticsannualtables. Accessed 2014

  13. Duff AR, Robertson IT, Cooper MD, Phillips RA (1993) Improving safety on construction sites by changing personnel behaviours, Report number 51

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walters D, James P (2009) Understanding the role of supply chains in influencing health and safety at work IOSH, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  15. Winkler C, Irwin JN (2003) Contractorisation – aspects of health and safety in the supply chain. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. HSE: Construction sector strategy 2012–15 http://www.hse.gov.uk/aboutus/strategiesandplans/sector-strategies/construction.htm. Accessed 2012

  17. Vickers I, Baldock R, Smallbone D, James P, Ekanem I (2003) Cultural influences on health and safety attitudes and behaviour in small businesses, HSE. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schein EH (1992) Organisational culture and leadership, 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  19. Farrington-Darby T, Pickup L, Wilson J (1997) Safety culture in railway maintenance

    Google Scholar 

  20. Westrum R (1993) Culture with requisite imagination cited. In: Wise J, Stager P, Hopkins J (eds) Verification and validation in complex man-machine systems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reason J (1997) Managing the risks of organisational accidents. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  22. Parker D, Lawrie M, Hudson P (2006) A framework for understanding the development of organisational safety culture. Saf Sci 44:551–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fleming M (2001) Safety culture maturity model. HMSO, London, pp 5–6

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ekvall, G.: Climate, structure and innovativeness of organisations. In: Working paper for Swedish council for management and organisational behaviour (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cox A (2002) Ireland, P.: Managing construction supply chains: the common sense approach. Eng. Constr. Archit Manag 9(5/6):409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Briscoe G, Dainty A, Millett S (2001) Construction supply chain partnerships: skills, knowledge and attitudinal requirements. Eur J Purch. Supply Manag. 7:243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hinze J, Gambatese J (2003) Factors that influence safety performance of speciality contractors. J Constr Eng Manag 2003:159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Briscoe G, Dainty A (2005) Construction supply chain integration: an elusive goal? Supply Chain Manag 10(4):319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Burnes B (1996) Managing change – a strategic approach to organisational dynamics, 2nd edn. Pitman Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  30. Weiner BJ (2009) A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implement Sci 4:67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. W.H. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hoorens V (1993) Self-enhancement and superiority biases in social comparison. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone M (eds) European review of social psychology, 4th edn. Wiley, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  33. Herscovitch L, Meyer JP (2002) Commitment to organisational change: extension of a three-component model. J Appl Psychol 87:474–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kotter JP (1996) Leading change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cooper D (2001) Improving safety culture – a practical guide. Applied Behavioural Sciences, Hull

    Google Scholar 

  36. Arditi D, Chotibhongs R (2005) Issues in subcontracting practice. J Constr Eng Manag 131:866–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Akintoye A, McIntosh G, Fitzgerald E (2000) A survey of supply chain collaboration and management in the UK construction industry. Eur J Purch. Supply Manag. 6:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hale AR, Guldenmund FW, van Loenhout PLCH, Oh JIH (2010) Evaluating safety management and culture interventions to improve safety: effective intervention strategies. Saf Sci 48(8):1026–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shelley Stiles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Stiles, S., Ryan, B., Golightly, D. (2019). Readiness to Change: Perceptions of Safety Culture up and down the Supply Chain. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 819. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96089-0_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics