Skip to main content

Can the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation Be Improved by Incorporating Personal Characteristics?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Abstract

The impact of manual material handling such as lifting, lowering, pushing and pulling have been extensively studied. Many models using these external demands to predict injury have been proposed and employed by safety and health professionals. However, ergonomic models incorporating personal characteristics into a comprehensive model are lacking. This study explores the utility of adding personal characteristics such as the estimated L5/S1 Intervertebral Disc (IVD) cross sectional area, height, age, gender and Body Mass Index (BMI) to the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation (RNLE) with the goal to improve injury prediction. A dataset with known RNLE Cumulative Lifting Indices (CLIs) and related health outcomes was used to evaluate the impact of personal characteristics on RNLE performance. The dataset included 29 cases and 101 controls selected from a cohort of 1,022 subjects performing 667 jobs. RNLE performance was significantly improved by incorporation of personal characteristics. Adding gender and intervertebral disc size multipliers to the RNLE raised the odds ratio for a CLI of 3.0 from 6.71 (CI: 2.2–20.9, PPV: 0.60, NPV: 0.82) to 24.75 (CI: 2.8–215.4, PPV: 0.86, NPV: 0.80). The most promising RNLE change involved incorporation of the multiplier based on the estimated IVD cross-sectional area (CSA). This multiplier was developed by normalizing against the IVD CSA for a 50th percentile woman. This multiplier could assume values greater than one (for subjects with larger IVD CSA than a 50th percentile woman). Thus, CLI could both decrease and increase as a result of this multiplier. Increases in RNLE performance were achieved primarily by decreasing the number of RNLE false positives (e.g., some CLIs for uninjured subjects were reduced below 3.0). Results are promising, but confidence intervals are broad and additional, prospective research is warranted to validate findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B (2003) Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull. World Health Organ. 81(9):646–656

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lidgren L (2003) The bone and joint decade 2000–2010. Bull. World Health Organ. 81(9):629

    Google Scholar 

  3. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council (2001) Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shiri R, Karppinen J, Leino-Arjas P, Solovieva S, Varonen H et al (2007) Cardiovascular and lifestyle risk factors in lumbar radicular pain or clinically defined sciatica: a systematic review. Eur. Spine J. 16:2043–2054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schumann B, Bolm-Audorff U, Bergmann A, Ellegast R, Elsner G et al (2010) Lifestyle factors and lumbar disc disease: results of a German multi-center case-control study (EPILIFFT). Arthritis Res Ther 12:193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Da Costa BR, Vieira ER (2010) Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53:285–323

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dempsey PG (2002) Usability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation. Ergonomics 45(12):817–828 Liberty Mutual Research Center for Safety & Health, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, Massachusetts 01748, USA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dempsey PG, McGorry RW, Maynard WS (2005) A survey of tools and methods used by certified professional ergonomists. Appl Ergon 36:489–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Fine L (1993) Revised NIOSH equation for design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 36(7):446–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A (1993) Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. US Department of Health and Human Services, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  11. Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Fine LJ (1993) Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 36:749–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A (1994) ‘Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation’ DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94–110, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gallagher S, Sesek RF, Schall M Jr, Huangfu R (2017) Development and validation of an easy-to-use risk assessment tool for cumulative low back loading: the lifting fatigue failure tool (LiFFT). Appl Ergon 63(142–150):13

    Google Scholar 

  14. Garg A (1995) Revised NIOSH equation for manual lifting: a method for job evaluation. AAOHN J 43(4):211–216

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sesek RF (1999) Evaluation and refinement of ergonomic survey tools to evaluate worker risk of cumulative trauma disorders. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sesek R, Gilkey D, Drinkaus P, Bloswick DS, Herron R (2003) Evaluation and qualification of manual materials handling risk factors. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 9(3):271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sesek R, Tang R, Gungor C, Gallagher S, Davis GA, Foreman KB (2014) Using MRI-derived spinal geometry to compute back compressive stress (BCS): a new measure of low back pain risk. In: Duffy V (ed) Proceedings of the 5th AHFE Conference, pp 13–18

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tang R (2013) Morphometric analysis of the human lower lumbar intervertebral discs and vertebral endplates: experimental approach and regression models. Doctoral Dissertation. Auburn University, Auburn, AL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This publication was partially supported by Grant # 2T420H008436 from NIOSH. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not constitute endorsement by the Public Health Service or by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Menekse Salar Barim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Barim, M.S., Sesek, R.F., Fehmi Capanoglu, M., Gallagher, S., Schall, M.C., Davis, G.A. (2019). Can the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation Be Improved by Incorporating Personal Characteristics?. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 820. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96083-8_73

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics