Abstract
In this paper, we discuss performance measurement systems in public organizations and their effects on both public sector workers and quality of the services provided to the population. Although performance measurement is often regarded as prerequisite for an efficient provision of public services in the context of New Public Management, a review of academic studies actually shows that its consequences on work and organizational performance are inconsistent and potentially deleterious. Hence our core questions are: how performance measurement became widespread in public sector? Which are the critical aspects in the design and use of performance measurement systems, regarding their relation to workers’ activities? How can they positively or negatively impact behaviours, tasks and activities, and relationships among workers? We discuss these questions based on the literature of public sector and ergonomics. Then, we present a case study that illustrates how performance measurement impacted the work of labour judges. Despite difficulties in accurately assessing or predicting the effects of performance measurement, managers can be benefited by considering their benefits, risks, and limitations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrahão JI, Sznelwar LI, Silvino A, Sarmet M, Pinho D (2009) Introdução à Ergonomia: da prática à teoria. Blucher, São Paulo
Clarke J, Gewirtz S, McLaughlin E (2000) Reinventing the welfare state. In: Clarke J, Gewirtz S, McLaughlin E (eds) New managerialism, new welfare? SAGE Publications Ltd, pp 1–26
Curristine T, Lonti Z, Joumard I (2007) Improving public sector efficiency: challenges and opportunities. OECD J Budgeting 7(1)
Davies J (2018) “Outcome” assessment: what exactly are we measuring? a personal reflection on measuring the outcomes from competition agencies’ interventions. De Economist 166(1):7–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-017-9307-6
Deming WE (1993) The new economics: for industry, government, education. MIT-CAES, Cambridge
Fleetwood S, Hesketh A (2011) Explaining the performance of human resource management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Guérin F, Laville A, Daniellou F, Duraffourg J, Kerguelen A (1997) Comprendre le travail pour le transformer: la pratique de l’ergonomie. ANACT, Montrouge, Hauts-de-Seine
Hood C (2012) Public management by numbers as a performance-enhancing drug: two hypotheses. Public Adm Rev 72(s1)
Lacombe BMB, Albuquerque LG (2008) Evaluation and measurement in human resource management: a study in Brazil. Revista de Administração 43(1):5–16
Morin E (1990) Science avec conscience. Points sciences
Wright BE (2001) Public-sector work motivation: a review of the current literature and a revised conceptual model. J Public Adm Res Theory 11(4):559–586
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kawasaki, B.C., Giannini, R., Lancman, S., Sznelwar, L.I. (2019). New Public Management, Performance Measurement, and Reconfiguration of Work in the Public Sector. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 821. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96080-7_59
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96080-7_59
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96079-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96080-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)