Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

User Innovation, Lead Users and Crowdsourcing for the Design of New Products and Services: Why, What and How?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 824))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The goal of this study is to examine new paradigms, approaches, methods and tools that can help Prospective Ergonomics (PE) in its dual mission of defining current and future needs of users/customers and creating innovative products and services. After exposing the highlights of the PE that serve as a framing for our study, we present and analyze three powerful concepts that can guide PE: User innovation, Lead users, and Crowdsourcing. The theme of User Innovation comes from the research of von Hippel initiated in the 70’s, which is at the origin of a paradigm shift in the field of innovation. His research, confirmed by several other researchers, showed that “a large part of the innovations of products and services was the outcome of the users rather than the manufacturers”. Lead users are “users of a product or service that currently experience needs still unknown to the public, and who are positioned to benefit significantly by obtaining a solution to their needs”. Included are users at the leading edges of the target market of a product or service, and users in other markets that do similar activities or face similar problems in a more extreme form. Finally crowdsourcing, which existed long before the digital age, is “a type of participative online activity in which an individual or a firm proposes to a group of individuals, via a flexible open call, the voluntary undertaking of a task”. One main field of application is the production and selection of innovative ideas. Finally, we present four new social-media crowdsourcing tools: UXModeler, Crowdboard, CrowdUX and SortedCrowdUX, as well as two cases of successful use of crowdsourcing in banking and industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Robert J-M, Brangier E (2009) What is prospective ergonomics? A reflection and a position on the future of ergonomics. In: Karsh BT (ed) Ergonomics and health aspects of work with computers. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 162–169

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Brangier É, Robert J-M (2014) L’ergonomie prospective: fondements et enjeux. Le travail humain 77:1. https://doi.org/10.3917/th.771.0001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Standard ISO, ISO B (2009) ISO 9241-210:2010 - Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. ISO

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ulwick T (2013) Silence the voice of the customer. In: Innovation management. http://www.innovationmanagement.se/2013/06/25/silence-the-voice-of-the-customer/. Accessed 27 May 2018

  5. Prévost M-C, Spooner D (2014) Concevoir rapidement des produits et services innovateurs en utilisant une approche ergonomique proactive: le cas d’une entreprise d’aide posturale. Le travail humain 77:207. https://doi.org/10.3917/th.773.0207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Griffin A (2012) Obtaining customer needs for product development. In: Kahn KB (ed) The PDMA handbook of new product development, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 213–230

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ulwick AW, Bettencourt LA (2008) Giving customers a fair hearing. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 49:62–68

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harhoff D, Lakhani KR (2016) Revolutionizing innovation: users, communities, and open innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lüthje C, Stockstrom C (2016) Cost advantages in innovation—a comparison of users and manufacturers. In: Revolutionizing innovation: users, communities, and open innovation, p 45

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gault F (2016) User innovation and official statistics. In: Harhoff D, Lakhani KR (eds) Revolutionizing innovation: users, communities, and open innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shah S, Tripsas M (2016) When do user innovators start firms? A theory of user entrepreneurship. In: Revolutionizing innovation: users, communities, and open innovation. MIT Press, pp 285–307

    Google Scholar 

  12. Benkler Y (2016) When von Hippel innovation met the networked environment: recognizing decentralized innovation. In: Revolutionizing innovation: users, communities, and open innovation. MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  13. Von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Manag Sci 32:791–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lead User (2017) Wikipedia

    Google Scholar 

  15. Berthon PR, Pitt L, McCarthy IP, Kates SM (2007) When customers get clever: managerial approaches to dealing with creative consumers. Social Science Research Network, Rochester

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lilien GL, Morrison PD, Searls K et al (2002) Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Manag Sci 48:1042–1059. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1042.171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lettl C, Perkmann Berger S, Roiser S (2016) Exploring why and to what extent lead users share knowledge with producer firms. In: Revolutionizing innovation: users, communities, and open innovation, p 45

    Google Scholar 

  18. Crowdsourcing (2018) Wikipedia

    Google Scholar 

  19. Howe J (2006) Crowdsourcing: a definition. In: crowdsourcing. http://www.crowdsourcing.com/cs/2006/06/crowdsourcing_a.html. Accessed 31 May 2018

  20. Brabham DC (2008) Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: an introduction and cases. Convergence 14:75–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856507084420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Estellés-Arolas E, González-Ladrón-de-Guevara F (2012) Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. J Inf Sci 38:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551512437638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun L, Xiang W, Chen S, Yang Z (2015) Collaborative sketching in crowdsourcing design: a new method for idea generation. Int J Technol Des Educ 25:409–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9283-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dow S, Gerber E, Wong A (2013) A pilot study of using crowds in the classroom. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 227–236

    Google Scholar 

  24. Luther K, Tolentino J-L, Wu W et al (2015) Structuring, aggregating, and evaluating crowdsourced design critique. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. ACM, New York, pp 473–485

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xu A, Huang S-W, Bailey B (2014) Voyant: generating structured feedback on visual designs using a crowd of non-experts. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. ACM, New York, pp 1433–1444

    Google Scholar 

  26. Park CH, Son K, Lee JH, Bae S-H (2013) Crowd vs. crowd: large-scale cooperative design through open team competition. In: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM, New York, pp 1275–1284

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hossain M, Kauranen I (2015) Crowdsourcing: a comprehensive literature review. Strat Outs 8:2–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/SO-12-2014-0029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barcellini F, Détienne F, Burkhardt J-M (2008) User and developer mediation in an Open Source Software community: boundary spanning through cross participation in online discussions. Int J Hum Comput Stud 66:558–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Näkki P, Koskela-Huotari K (2012) User participation in software design via social media: experiences from a case study with consumers. AIS Trans Hum Comput Interact 4:129–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Preece J, Shneiderman B (2009) The reader-to-leader framework: motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Trans Hum Comput Interact 1:13–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Elliott A (2015) Death and social media implications for the young and will-less - proquest. Jurimetrics 55:381–405

    Google Scholar 

  32. Alcántara JM, Markopoulos P, Funk M (2015) Social media as ad hoc design collaboration tools. In: T de G (ed) ACM international conference proceeding series. Association for Computing Machinery

    Google Scholar 

  33. Greenwood P, Rashid A, Walkerdine J (2012) UDesignIt: towards social media for community-driven design. In: Proceedings of the 34th international conference on software engineering. IEEE Press, Piscataway, pp 1321–1324

    Google Scholar 

  34. Herring SR, Poon CM, Balasi GA, Bailey BP (2011) TweetSpiration: leveraging social media for design inspiration. In: CHI 2011 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 2311–2316

    Google Scholar 

  35. Qaed F, Briggs J, Cockton G (2016) Social media resources for participative design research. In: Proceedings of the 14th participatory design conference: short papers, interactive exhibitions, Workshops, vol 2. ACM, New York, pp 49–52

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stuedahl D, Lowe S (2014) Re-considering Participation in social media designs. In: Proceedings of the 13th participatory design conference: short papers, industry cases, workshop descriptions, doctoral consortium papers, and keynote abstracts, vol 2. ACM, New York, pp 107–110

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kraut RE, Resnick P, Kiesler S et al (2012) Building successful online communities: evidence-based social design. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sanders EB-N, Brandt E, Binder T (2010) A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 11th biennial participatory design conference. ACM, New York, pp 195–198

    Google Scholar 

  39. Straus D, Layton TC (2002) How to make collaboration work: powerful ways to build consensus, solve problems, and make decisions. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wolff D, Seffah A (2011) UX modeler: a persona-based tool for capturing and modeling user experience in service design. In: PUX 2011 program committee, pp 7–16

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bjørn-Andersen N, Hedberg B (1977) Designing information systems in an organizational perspective. TIMS Stud Manag Sci 5:125–142

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gopsill JA, McAlpine HC, Hicks BJ (2013) A social media framework to support engineering design communication. Adv Eng Inform 27:580–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2013.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Andolina S, Schneider H, Chan J et al (2017) Crowdboard: augmenting in-person idea generation with real-time crowds. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI conference on creativity and cognition. ACM, New York, pp 106–118

    Google Scholar 

  44. Warr A, O’Neill E (2005) Understanding design as a social creative process. In: Proceedings of the 5th conference on creativity and cognition. ACM, New York, pp 118–127

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wang H-C, Cosley D, Fussell SR (2010) Idea expander: supporting group brainstorming with conversationally triggered visual thinking stimuli. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM, New York, pp 103–106

    Google Scholar 

  46. Siangliulue P, Chan J, Dow SP, Gajos KZ (2016) IdeaHound: improving large-scale collaborative ideation with crowd-powered real-time semantic modeling. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual symposium on user interface software and technology. ACM, New York, pp 609–624

    Google Scholar 

  47. Buskirk EV (2010) Google struggles to give away $10 million. In: WIRED. https://www.wired.com/2010/06/google-struggles-to-give-away-10-million/all/. Accessed 31 May 2018

  48. Simonton DK (2018) Defining creativity: don’t we also need to define what is not creative? J Creat Behav 52:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Schneider H, Frison K, Wagner J, Butz A (2016) CrowdUX: a case for using widespread and lightweight tools in the quest for UX. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM conference on designing interactive systems. ACM, New York, pp 415–426

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ogawa S, Nishikawa H (2016) Crowdsourcing at MUJI. In: Revolutionizing innovation: users, communities, and open innovation

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Jean-Marc Robert & Mitra Taraghi

  2. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland

    Masood Maldar & Ahmed Seffah

Authors
  1. Jean-Marc Robert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masood Maldar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mitra Taraghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmed Seffah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Marc Robert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of the Republic of San Marino, San Marino, San Marino

    Sebastiano Bagnara

  2. Centre for Clinical Risk Management and Patient Safety, Tuscany Region, Florence, Italy

    Riccardo Tartaglia

  3. Centre for Clinical Risk Management and Patient Safety, Tuscany Region, Florence, Italy

    Sara Albolino

  4. Fraunhofer FKIE, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Thomas Alexander

  5. International Ergonomics Association, Tokyo, Japan

    Yushi Fujita

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Robert, JM., Maldar, M., Taraghi, M., Seffah, A. (2019). User Innovation, Lead Users and Crowdsourcing for the Design of New Products and Services: Why, What and How?. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_77

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation