Skip to main content

The Role and Positioning of Observation in Ergonomics Approaches: A Research and Design Project

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Abstract

Observation methods historically form a significant part of the identity of activity-oriented approaches to ergonomics, while playing a central role in the holistic approach to work activity. This paper introduces the issue of the role and positioning of observation in ergonomics approaches, and presents a current research and design project. Started two years ago, the project promotes research and practice exchanges, involving reflections on and teaching of observation methods and techniques. Its objectives are threefold: (1) design an open and stable tool for in-situ observation, (2) contribute to the research about observation and human activities, and (3) promote teaching of observation methods and techniques. The paper concludes with an outline of the next steps for research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Norimatsu H, Cazeneuve-Tapie P (2017) Techniques d’observation en Sciences humaines et sociales [Observation techniques in human and social sciences]. In: 52ème Congrès de la SELF, Toulouse, France

    Google Scholar 

  2. Norimatsu H, Pigem N (eds) (2008) Les techniques d’observation en sciences humaines [Observation techniques in human sciences], Armand Colin, Paris (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arborio A-M, Fournier P (2012) L’enquête et ses méthodes. L’observation directe [Survey methods: direct observation], 3rd edn. Armand Colin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kohn RC (1982) Les enjeux de l’observation [observation issues]. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daniellou F, Rabardel P (2005) Activity-oriented approaches to ergonomics: some traditions and communities. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 6(5):353–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Keyser V (1995) Time in ergonomics research. Ergonomics 38(8):1639–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guérin F, Laville A, Daniellou F, Duraffourg J, Kerguelen A (2007) Understanding and transforming work: the practice of ergonomics, France, p 318. ANACT

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kerguelen A (1995) Description et quantification en analyse ergonomique du travail: le cas de l’observation systématique [Description and quantification in ergonomic analysis of work: the case of systematic observation]. Travail/Emploi, pp 131–139, France

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kerguelen A (2008) Actogram Kronos: un outil d’aide à l’analyse de l’activité [a tool to assist analysis of activity]. In: Norimatsu M, Pigem N (eds) Les techniques d’observation en sciences humaines [Observation techniques in human sciences]. Armand Colin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  10. Molinié A-F, Gaudart C, Pueyo V (eds) (2012) La vie professionnelle: âge, expérience et santé à l’épreuve des conditions de travail [Working life: age, experience, and health put to the test by workplace conditions]. Octarès, Toulouse, France

    Google Scholar 

  11. Volkoff S, Gaudart C (2015) Working conditions and “sustainability”: converting knowledge into action, Rapport de recherche no 92, 47 p. CEE, France

    Google Scholar 

  12. Béguin P (2007) Taking activity into account during the design process. Activités (4–2). http://journals.openedition.org/activites/1727

  13. Daniellou F (2015) Hommage à Alain Kerguelen [A tribute to Alain Kerguelen]. Bulletin de la SELF

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gaillard I, Chauvin C (2016) Analysing activity: what endures and what is new? Le trav hum 79(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaudart C (2016) Activity, time and itineraries: for the integration of multiple times in the ergonomic analysis of work. Le trav hum 79(3):208–232

    Google Scholar 

  16. Darses F (2016) Activity analysis: not what it was! Le trav hum 79(3):193–208 https://www.puf.com/content/travail_humain_2016_vol_79_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Falzon P (ed) (2015) Constructive ergonomics, 294 p. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gaudart C (2000) Conditions for maintaining ageing operators at work—a case study conducted at an automobile manufacturing plant. Appl Ergon 31(5):453–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Delgoulet C (2008) Apprentissage en binôme. Exemple de codage et d’analyse d’une série temporelle auprès d’agents de maintenance ferroviaire en formation [Paired learning. An example of coding and analysis of a time series for railway maintenance personnel]. In: Norimatsu H, Pigem N (eds) Les techniques d’observation en sciences humaines [Observation techniques in human sciences], pp 90–99. Armand Colin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barthe B (2008) Le travail de nuit à l’hôpital: comment appréhender la dimension collective du travail à partir de l’observation [Night shifts in a hospital: How to grasp the collective dimension of work using observation]? In: Norimatsu H, Pigem N (eds) Les techniques d’observation en sciences humaines [Observation techniques in human sciences], pp 108–119. Armand Colin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rocha R, Mollo V, Daniellou F (2015) Work debate spaces: a tool for developing a participatory safety management. Appl Ergon 46:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Delgoulet C, Kerguelen A, Barthe B (2000) Vers une analyse intégrée des communications et des actions au travail : quelles modalités de leur mise en relation [Towards integrated analysis of communication and actions at work: which linking modalities to employ]? In: 35ème Congrès de la SELF, Toulouse, France, pp 363–375

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bastien JMC, Scapin DL (1997) Ergonomic criteria for evaluating the ergonomic quality of interactive systems. Behav Inf Technol 16(4):5–22

    Google Scholar 

  24. Delgoulet C, Sinassamy C, Weill-Fassina A (2009) Taxing work and age: combined effects of physically and psychologically demanding work on ASEM (Agents Spécialisés des Écoles Maternelles) teacher’s assistants in French preschools. In: Proceedings of the XVIIth trienal congress of IEA, Beijing China

    Google Scholar 

  25. Delgoulet C (2012) Being a trainer in the French vocational training system: a case study on job status and working conditions related to perceived health. Work 41(suppl.):5203–5209

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Boccara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Boccara, V., Delgoulet, C., Zara-Meylan, V., Barthe, B., Gaillard, I., Meylan, S. (2019). The Role and Positioning of Observation in Ergonomics Approaches: A Research and Design Project. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_189

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics