Abstract
During production, companies aim to ensure optimal productivity and quality. With this in mind, workstation designers tend to assume that operators will perform tasks in a uniform manner, and tend not to include movement variability parameters in their designs. The aim of this study was to characterise movement variability during repetitive assembly tasks performed at a defined pace. 62 right-handed men in three different age groups were asked to affix a handle on a base with two nuts at two different paces. Particular attention was paid to how two factors influenced movement variability: the operator’s and the pace of work. Variability was observed in assembly way of doing when the procedure was not imposed. The variability observed during assembly, as performed for this study, was unaffected by operators’ age or the pace of work. No effect of variability was observed on the duration of assembly cycles, nor on the adaptation to changes in pace. In contrast, variability allowed operators alternatives to repetitive movement which could potentially exert strain on the locomotor system. Allowing operators the possibility to spontaneously use variable movements during repetitive tasks appears to be an important element to consider when designing workstations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Berthoz A (1997) Le sens du mouvement. Odile Jacob (Eds), Paris
Glazier PS, Wheat JS, Pease DL, Bartlett R (2006) Dynamic system theory and the functional role of movement variability. In: Davids K, Bennett S, Newell K (eds) Movement system variability. Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign (IL), pp 49–72
Diniz A, Wijnants ML, Torre K, Barreiros J, Crato N, Bosman AM, Hasselman F, Cox RF, Van Orden GC, Delignières D (2011) Contemporary theories of 1/f noise in motor control. Hum Mov Sci 30(5):889–905
Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schröner G (2002) Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30(1):26–31
Jackson JA, Mathiassen SE, Dempsey PG (2009) Methodological variance associated with normalization of occupational upper trapezius EMG using sub-maximal reference contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 19(3):416–427
Madeleine P, Lundager B, Voigt M, Arendt-Nielsen L (2003) The effects of neck-shoulder pain development on sensory-motor interactions among female workers in the poultry and fish industries. a prospective study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76(1):39–49
Madeleine P, Lundager B, Voigt M, Arendt-Nielsen L (2003) Standardized low-load repetitive work: evidence of different motor control strategies between experienced workers and a reference group. Appl Ergon 34(6):533–542
Mathiassen SE, Burdorf A, Van der Beek AJ (2002) Statistical power and measurement allocation in ergonomic intervention studies assessing upper trapezius EMG amplitude. a case study of assembly work. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 12(1):45–57
Mathiassen SE, Möller T, Forsman M (2003) Variability in mechanical exposure within and between individuals performing a highly constrained industrial work task. Ergonomics 46(3):800–824
Terrier P, Schutz Y (2003) Variability of gait patterns during unconstrained walking assessed by satellite positioning (GPS). Eur J Appl Physiol 90(5–6):554–561
Svendsen JH, Madeleine P (2010) Amount and structure of force variability during short, ramp and sustained contractions in males and females. Hum Mov Sci 29(1):35–47
Madeleine P, Voigt M, Mathiassen SE (2008) The size of cycle-to-cycle variability in biomechanical exposure among butchers performing a standardised cutting task. Ergonomics 51(7):1078–1095
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gilles, M.A., Gaudez, C., Savin, J., Remy, A., Remy, O., Wild, P. (2019). How Age and Pace of Work Affect Movement Variability During Repetitive Assembly Tasks. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 826. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96065-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96065-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96064-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96065-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)