Abstract
A straightforward and valid instrument for measuring cognitive workload would be heavily appreciated in many research areas, such as human-machine-interaction, driver behavior (e.g. automation and fatigue), usability and UI design (e.g. adaptive displays), training and education, or other areas, that are interested in the assessment of the cognitive state of a person. The Index of Cognitive Activity (ICA) is a promising but also controversially discussed instrument that could be of high relevance if it keeps its promises. The ICA is a patent from the year 2000, which claims to be an effective, light-independent recording method of mental workload.
On the basis of a literature research, we carried out a lab experiment to evaluate the ICA. Participants were equipped with an Eyetracking device and worked on a mental rotation task and a Stroop task under varying light conditions. The NASA-TLX was to be answered after each test condition to evaluate the subjective workload of the participants in each condition. If the ICA is truly light-independent, the ICA should show the same mental workload for each light condition. Results show expected ICA values for the Spatial Task, but inconclusive ICA values for the Stroop Task. Possible explanations and future work is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Marshall SP (2002) The index of cognitive activity: measuring cognitive workload. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 7th conference on human factors and power plants in new century, new trends, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, p 7.5
Schwalm M (2009) Pupillometrie als Methode zur Erfassung mentaler Beanspruchungen im automotiven Kontext, Dissertation
Johannsen G (1979) Workload and workload measurement. In: Moray N (ed) Mental workload. Springer, Boston, pp 3–11
Damos DL (ed) (1991) Multiple-task performance. Taylor & Francis, London, Washington, DC
Korbach A, Brünken R, Park B (2017) Differentiating different types of cognitive load: a comparison of different measures. Educ Psychol Rev 16(6582):389
van Gog T, Kirschner F, Kester L, Paas F (2012) Timing and frequency of mental effort measurement: evidence in favour of repeated measures. Appl Cognit Psychol 26(6):833–839
Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J
Beatty J (1982) Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychol Bull 91(2):276–292
Loose C (2004) Psychosensorische Pupillendilatation bei bewusster und unbewusster visueller Informationsverarbeitung: Untersuchungen an normalsichtigen Probanden und Hemianopikern
Hampson RE, Opris I, Deadwyler SA (2010) Neural correlates of fast pupil dilation in nonhuman primates: relation to behavioral performance and cognitive workload, (eng). Behav Brain Res 212(1):1–11
Janisse MP (1977) Pupillometry: The psychology of the pupillary response. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation; Distributed solely by Halsted Press, Washington, New York
Laeng B, Orbo M, Holmlund T, Miozzo M (2011) Pupillary Stroop effects, (eng). Cognit Process 12(1):13–21
Marshall SP (2000) Method and Apparatus for Eye Tracking and Monitoring Pupil Dilation to Evaluate Cognitive Activity, 6,090,051, US006090051A, USA, 18 July 2000
Loewenfeld IE, Lowenstein O (1993) The pupil: Anatomy, physiology, and clinical applications. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames
Schlegel RE, Gilliland K, Schlegel B (1987) Factor structure of the criterion task set. Proc Hum Factors Soc Ann Meet 31(4):389–393
Hart SG, Staveland L (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Human mental workload, pp 139–183
Bortz J, Döring N (2006) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler, 4th edn. Springer Medizin Verlag, Heidelberg
Funahashi S (2006) Prefrontal cortex and working memory processes, (eng). Neuroscience 139(1):251–261
Schwalm M, Keinath A, Zimmer HD (2008) Pupillometry as a method for measuring mental workload within a simulated driving task. In: Waard D, Flemisch FO, Lorenz B, Oberheid H, Bookhuis KA (eds) Human factors for assistance and automation. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, The Netherlands, pp 1–13
Demberg V, Sayeed A (2016) The frequency of rapid pupil dilations as a measure of linguistic processing difficulty, (eng). PLoS ONE 11(1):e0146194
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rerhaye, L., Blaser, T., Alexander, T. (2019). Evaluation of the Index of Cognitive Activity (ICA) as an Instrument to Measure Cognitive Workload Under Differing Light Conditions. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 827. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96059-3_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96059-3_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96058-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96059-3
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)