Skip to main content

Smarter Decisions for Smarter Cities: Lessons Learned from Strategic Plans

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Paths of Entrepreneurship Development

Abstract

This chapter presents challenges and methodological insights from applying smart city approaches in the context of public decision-making. It discusses the smart city as a changing and fuzzy concept which expresses the need for cities to find ICT-driven, intelligent and sustainable solutions to a panoply of urban challenges, covering many dimensions: smart economy; smart mobility; smart environment; smart people; smart living; and smart governance. In the urban planning context, where these dimensions need to be considered in an integrated manner, the smart approach relies on the ability to link infrastructures, services and users, increasing the flexibility and transparency of urban policies and decision-making. In this context, smart approaches must move beyond an urban labelling phenomenon and be grounded in a (horizontal) urban policy practice. Four Portuguese strategic plans are used as empirical examples of improving decision-making by incorporating ICT in the process design. The focus is on the methodological contributions and on illustrating how the smart city concept can be adjusted to analyse concrete policy approaches in the complex system of spatial interactions that form modern urban environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakıcı, T., Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2013). A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, D. (2004). The network society. Cambridge: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrionuevo, J., Berrone, P., & Ricart, J. (2012). Smart cities, sustainable progress. IESE Insight, 14, 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M., et al. (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal: Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, J., & Margetts, H. (2016). Big data and public policy: Can it succeed where e-participation has failed? Policy and Internet, 8(3), 218–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, J. (2013). Custos e benefícios, à escala local, de uma ocupação dispersa. Direção-Geral do Território.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, E. et al. (2014). Integrated decision support system – Donut-Prospect. In Proceedings of the 54th congress of the European Regional Science Association, Saint Petersburg – Russia, 2629 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, T. (2001). Urbanization, suburbanization, counterurbanization and reurbanization. In R. Paddison (Ed.), Handbook of urban studies (pp. 143–161). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J., & Masser, I. (2003). Modelling urban growth patterns: A multiscale perspective. Environment and Planning A, 35(4), 679–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrysoulakis, N., et al. (2013). Sustainable urban metabolism as a link between bio-physical sciences and urban planning: The BRIDGE project. Landscape Urban Planning, 112, 100–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, T. (2001). Smart growth: A new American approach to regional planning. Planning Practice & Research, 16(3/4), 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. (1997). Citizen participation in the planning process: An essentially contested concept? Journal of Planning Literature, 11(3), 421–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2013). Digital agenda for Europe. The role of regions and cities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2012). The rise of the creative class – revisited: 10th Anniversary edition – Revised and expanded. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1993). Toward a non-euclidian mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4), 482–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giffinger, R., & Haindlmaier, G. (2010). Smart cities ranking: An effective instrument for the positioning of cities? Architecture, City and Environment, IV(12), 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, D., et al. (2012). Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3). Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City, 12(3), 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jinbaek, K. (2006). E-democracy and engineering of societal decision processes (pdf). InterNeg Research Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N. (2002). Intelligent cities: Innovation, knowledge systems, and digital spaces. London: Spon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komninos, N. (2011). Intelligent cities: Variable geometries of spatial intelligence. Intelligent Buildings International, 3(3), 172–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourtit, K., & Nijkamp, P. (2012). Smart cities in the innovation age. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzmann, K. (2013). Strategic planning: A chance for spatial innovation and creativity. disP-The Planning Review, 49(3), 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahizhnan, A. (1999). Smart cities: The Singapore case. Cities, 16(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J., et al. (2008). Exercício de Prospectiva para a Região Centro – Análise de Cenários e Questionário Delphi. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais, 19, 111–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, K. O. (1954). Intransitivity, utility, and the aggregation of preference patterns. Economica, 22(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, A., & Bolivar, M. P. R. (2015). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J. (2006). Post-structuralist geography: A guide to relational space. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference on digital government innovation in challenging times – dg.o ‘11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogueira, F., Borges, M., & Wolf, J. H. (2017). Collaborative decision-making in non-formal planning settings. Group Decision and Negotiation, 26(5), 875–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D. F., & Reddick, C. G. (2013). Local E-government in the United States: Transformation or incremental change? Public Administration Review, 73(1), 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, A., & Brito, D. (2013). Living labs: A experiência Portuguesa. Revista Ciencia, tecnología y género en Iberoamérica, 8(23), 201–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, B. E. (2010, June). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. The American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, G., et al. (2013). Trace analysis and mining for smart cities: Issues, methods, and applications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(6), 120–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papa, E., & Lauwers, D. (2015). Smart mobility: Opportunity or threat to innovate places and cities? In 20th International conference on urban planning and regional development in the information society (pp. 543–550). REAL CORP 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patsakis, C., et al. (2015). Interoperable privacy-aware E-participation within smart cities. Computer, 48(1), 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, T., & Minnery, J. (2012). Scale and public participation: Issues in metropolitan regional planning. Planning Practice and Research, 27(2), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, D. E., & Popper, F. J. (2002). Small can be beautiful: Coming to terms with decline. Planning, 68(7), 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (2003). Freedom to choose and democracy. Economics and Philosophy, 19(2), 265–279. Accessed January 9, 2014, from http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0266267103001159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. a. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. Available from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selada, C., & Silva, C. (2013). As Cidades Inteligentes na Agenda Europeia: Oportunidades para Portugal. In II Conferência de PRU, VIII ENPLAN e XVIII workshop APDR: “Europa 2020: retórica, discursos, política e prática.” Aveiro (pp. 243–275).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J. M. (2006). Smart cities: Quality of life, productivity, and the growth effects of human capital. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(May), 324–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simões, M. J. (2005). Política e Tecnologia: Tecnologias da informação e da comunicação e participação política em Portugal. Oeiras: Celta Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simões, M. J., et al. (2008). Dos Projectos às Regiões Digitais: Que desafios? Lisboa: Celta Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratigea, A. (2012). The concept of ‘smart cities’: Towards community development? Networks and Communication Studies, 26(3–4), 375–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, L., et al. (1982). Urban Europe: A study of growth and decline. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Djik, J. (2000). Models of democracy and concepts of communication. In K. Hacker & J. Van Dijk (Eds.), Digital democracy (pp. 209–233). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanolo, A. (2013). Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies, Early View(April), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, W. E., Rahman, S. A., & Cave, J. (2001). Adaptive policies, policy analysis, and policy-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 128(2), 282–289. Available from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0377221700000710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., et al. (2013). A survey on smart grid communication infrastructures: Motivations, requirements and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 15(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanella, A., et al. (2014). Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(1), 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zygiaris, S. (2013). Smart city reference model: Assisting planners to conceptualize the building of smart city innovation ecosystems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was financially supported by: Project Portugal: Regional Integration of Demography and Economy Financiamento solicitado (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016431 & POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016868) funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020—Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) and by national funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jan Wolf , Monique Borges , João Lourenço Marques or Eduardo Castro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wolf, J., Borges, M., Marques, J.L., Castro, E. (2019). Smarter Decisions for Smarter Cities: Lessons Learned from Strategic Plans. In: Cagica Carvalho, L., Rego, C., Lucas, M.R., Sánchez-Hernández, M.I., Backx Noronha Viana, A. (eds) New Paths of Entrepreneurship Development. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96032-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics