Abstract
This chapter examines the supervision of local authorities’ actions by upper levels of government. The starting point is that all regional or national authorities exercise a certain type of administrative control over the activities of local governments. However, there is diversity among systems both in the scope (legality v. expediency) of supervision and in the tools (a priori v. a posteriori) that they use for this control. The empirical analysis concentrates on the first aspect and shows both that most European countries limit the supervision to controlling only the legality of local acts and that there have been barely changes over time in this dimension of local autonomy. A closer look to country specificities shows, though, how along these positive values and remarkable stability a subtle trend towards a growing supervision on financial management stands out as an emerging pattern in a non-negligible number of the cases analysed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Council of Europe. (1985). European Charter of Local Self-Government (n°122). Retrieved from http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/122.htm. Consulted in 2018.
Council of Europe. (1999). Supervision and Auditing of Local Authorities’ Action. Report by the Steering Committee on Local and Regional Democracy. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Greve, E. (2012). Denmark. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: A Comparative Legal Perspective. Madrid: INAP.
Hertzog, R. (2012). France. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: A Comparative Legal Perspective. Madrid: INAP.
Himsworth, C. (2012). United Kingdom. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: A Comparative Legal Perspective. Madrid: INAP.
Kuhlmann, S., & Wayenberg, E. (2016). Institutional Impact Assessment in Multi-level Systems: Conceptualizing Decentralization Effects from a Comparative Perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 233–254.
Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2014). Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Ladner A., Keuffer N., & Baldersheim, H. (2016). Self-Rule Index for Local Authorities (Release 1.0). Final Report, Publications Office of the European Union.
Loughlin, J., Hendriks, F., & Lidström, A. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moreno, Á. M. (2012). Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: A Comparative Legal Perspective. Madrid: INAP.
Peters, B. G. (2011). Governance Responses to the Fiscal Crisis – Comparative Perspectives. Public Money & Management, 31(1), 75–80.
Scente, Z. (2012). Hungary. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: A Comparative Legal Perspective. Madrid: INAP.
Vandelli, L. (2012). Italy. In Á. M. Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: A Comparative Legal Perspective. Madrid: INAP.
Velasco, F. (2009). Kingdom of Spain. In N. C. Steytler & J. Kincaid (Eds.), Local Government and Metropolitan Regions in Federal Systems (pp. 299–328). Montreal/Kingston: MacGill-Queen’s University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ladner, A. et al. (2019). Administrative Supervision. In: Patterns of Local Autonomy in Europe. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95642-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95642-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95641-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95642-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)