Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Features of Decision-Making Simulation When Designing Locomotive Underframe Part

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The analysis of the logic of choice of design options for the locomotive underframe part is carried out. It is established that the solution of the problem situation in the choice of the design of the units of the outfit part is the development of a multivariate strategy for creating and mastering the production of various design variants. A new design of the traction drive is proposed and patented, instead of a technologically complex integrated axial thrust drive, it is offered to use a support frame drive with an axial reduction gear at the early stages of implementation, with a subsequent transition to an axle-type traction drive of the aggregate type, combining high processability and the possibility of reducing the TM weight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lockett H, Guenov M A knowledge based expert system for moulded part design. ICED’07/426

    Google Scholar 

  2. Capilla R, Bosch J, Kang K (2013) Systems and software variability management. Springer, p 300

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jones SW (1973) Product design and process selection. Butterworth, p 206

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design—a systematic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, p 620

    Google Scholar 

  5. Park G-J (2007) Analytic methods for design practice. Springer, p 627

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bourdot P, Convard T, Picon F, Ammi M, Touraine D, Vezien J-M (2010) VR-CAD integration: multimodal immersive interaction and advanced haptic paradigms for implicit edition of CAD models. Comput Aided Des 42:445–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen Y, Liu Z-L, Xie Y-B (2012) A knowledge-based framework for creative conceptual design of multidisciplinary sytems. Comput Aided Des 44:146–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kondrashov V, Maksimov I, Galperin V (1999) Development of the wheel profiles of cars and locomotives for the existing railways for reduction of wear of wheel flanges and lateral surfaces of rail. International heavy haul association STS-conference “wheel/rail interface”, vol 1, pp 95–102

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jendel T (2002) Prediction of wheel profile wear—comparisons with field measurements. Wear 253:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Braghin F, Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce RS, Brunia S (2006) A mathematical model to predict railway wheel profile evolution due to wear. J Wear 261:1253–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu Y, Liu L, Stratman B, Mahadevan S (2008) Multiaxial fatigue reliability analysis of railroad wheels. J Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:456–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pombo J, Ambrosio J, Pereira M, Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce R, Ariaudo C, Kuka N (2010) A railway wheel wear prediction tool based on a multibody software. J Theor Appl Mech 48(3):751–770

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin J, Asplund M, Parida A (2014) Reliability analysis for degradation of locomotive wheels using parametric bayesian approach. Qual Reliab Eng Int 30:657–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar U, Ahmadi A, Verma AK, Varde P (2016) Current trends in reliability, availability, maintainability and safety. Springer, Berlin, p 738

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Bimal K (1997) Bose power electronics and variable frequency drives. IEEE Press, p 640

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kondo K, Matsuoka K (2000) Control system of permanent magnet synchronous motor for railway vehicle traction. Q Rep RTRI 41:94–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghate P, Shankapal SR, Gowda MH (2012) Failure investigation of a freight locomotive suspension spring and redesign of the spring for durability and ride index. SASTECH J 11:23–29

    Google Scholar 

  18. Myamlin S, Luchanin M, Neduzha L (2013) Construction analysis of mechanical parts of locomotives. TEKA Comm Motorization Energetics Agric 13:162–169

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vorobyov VI, Strizhenok AG, Izmerov OV (2016) Search for new constructive schemes of geared and direct drive locomotive traction drive with partial mass curing. Bull Bryansk State Tech Univ 1(49):16–21

    Google Scholar 

  20. Naveen S, Kiran CP, Prabhu Das M, Naga Dilip P, Prathibha Bharathi VV (2014) Study on bogie and suspension system of an electric locomotive (Wap-4). IJMER 4:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  21. Railway technical handbook (2012) SKF Group 2:236

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vorobiev VI, Izmerov OV, Novikov VG, Vdovin AV, Bondarenko DA, Novikov AS, Vorobiev DV (2016) Traction drive locomotive. RF Patent 164797, 20 Sept 2016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bryansk State Technical University, 7, Bul. 50 Let Octobrya, Bryansk, 241035, Russia

    V. I. Vorobiev, O. V. Izmerov & S. O. Kopyilov

Authors
  1. V. I. Vorobiev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. V. Izmerov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. O. Kopyilov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. I. Vorobiev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

    Andrey A. Radionov

  2. Platov South-Russian State Polytechnic University, Novocherkassk, Russia

    Oleg A. Kravchenko

  3. South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

    Victor I. Guzeev

  4. South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

    Yurij V. Rozhdestvenskiy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vorobiev, V.I., Izmerov, O.V., Kopyilov, S.O. (2019). Features of Decision-Making Simulation When Designing Locomotive Underframe Part. In: Radionov, A., Kravchenko, O., Guzeev, V., Rozhdestvenskiy, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Industrial Engineering. ICIE 2018. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95630-5_253

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95630-5_253

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95629-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95630-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation