Abstract
In this chapter, Newhart and Larkins highlight a study that explores a possible connection between elements of inclusivity and academic success. They outline several practices which were co-created with students in this initiative. Their chapter explores practices using an equity lens when engaging students in campus climate for diversity efforts which may go beyond a survey at a single point in time and turn into a productive, continual conversation between students and the institution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2011). Choosing a mixed methods design. Designing and conducting mixed methods research (pp. 53–106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Fowler, F. J. (2009). Survey research methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Martinez-Aleman, A. M., Pusser, B., & Bensimon, E. M. (2015). Introduction. In A. M. Martinez-Aleman, B. Pusser, & E. M. Bensimon (Eds.), Critical approaches to the study of higher education: A practical introduction (pp. 1–6). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mertens, D. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 212–225.
Mertens, D. M. (2012). Transformative mixed methods: Addressing inequities. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 1–12.
Mertens, D. M., Bazeley, P., Bowleg, L., Fielding, N., Maxwell, J., Molina-Azorin, J. F., et al. (2016). The future of mixed methods: A five year projection to 2020. Retrieved online: http://mmira.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/MMIRA%20task%20force%20report%20Jan2016%20final.pdf.
Mertens, D. M., Bledsoe, K. L., Sullivan, M., & Wilson, A. (2010). Utilization of mixed methods for transformative purposes. In A. Tashakkoria & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 193–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Newhart, D. W. (2013). When is a survey more than a survey? About Campus, 18, 30–32.
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2013). R-words: Refusing research. In D. Paris & M. T. Winn (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 223–249). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wall, A. F., Hursh, D., & Rodgers, J. W. (2014). Assessment for whom: Repositioning higher education assessment as an ethical and value-focused social practice. Research and Practice in Assessment, 9, 5–17.
Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Newhart, D.W., Larkins, E.L. (2018). Campus Climate for Diversity as Dialogue: Using an Equity Lens to Center Students. In: Soria, K. (eds) Evaluating Campus Climate at US Research Universities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94836-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94836-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94835-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94836-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)