Skip to main content

Why Not Marry a Robot?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human–Robot Intimate Relationships

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

The trend of robotics research and development, from industrial robots to service robots to companion and carer robots, has as its logical continuation the design and construction of partner robots, sufficiently human-like and sufficiently appealing in various ways to take on the role of a partner in a relationship with a human being. This trend immediately raises many questions relating to humans loving and being loved by robots, treating robots as life partners and being similarly treated by them, marrying robots and having sex with robots. We discuss some aspects of human-robot marriage and reassess the author’s 10-year-old prediction that the first human-robot marriage will take place in the state of Massachusetts around the year 2050.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The content of this chapter is from a keynote speech delivered by Dr. David Levy at the Second International Congress on Love and Sex with Robots in London, 2016.

  2. 2.

    Tom Scocca, 2010, “Newt Gingrich on Gay Marriage: Shameless and/or Fearless”, Slate. http://www.slate.com/blogs/scocca/2010/08/05/newt_gingrich_on_gay_marriage_shameless_and_or_fearless.html.

  3. 3.

    “Defence of Marriage Act”, 1996. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-104publ199/html/PLAW-104publ199.htm.

  4. 4.

    “Southern Baptist Convention resolutions”. 2003. http://www.sbc.net/resolutions/1128.

  5. 5.

    Gary Marchant, 2015, “A.I. Thee Wed”, Slate. http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2015/08/humans_should_be_able_to_marry_robots.html.

References

  1. Association CP (2006) Marriage of same-sex couples – 2006 position statement. http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/UserFiles/Documents/Practice_Page/Marriage_SameSex_Couples_PositionStatement.pdf

  2. Chopra S, White LF (2011) A legal theory for autonomous artificial agents. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Freitas RA (1985) The legal rights of robots. Student lawyer 13(1):54–56

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goldfeder M, Razin Y (2015) Robotic marriage and the law. J Law Soc Deviance 10:137

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hubbard FP (2010) Do androids dream: personhood and intelligent artifacts. Temp L Rev 83:405

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leroux C, Labruto R, Boscarato C, Caroleo F, Günther J, Löffler S, Hilgendorf E (2012) Suggestion for a green paper on legal issues in robotics. Contrib Deliv D 3(1)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Levy D (2006) Emotional relationships with robotic companions. In: EURON workshop on roboethics, Genoa

    Google Scholar 

  8. Levy D (2006) A history of machines with sexual functions: past, present and robot. In: EURON workshop on roboethics, Genoa

    Google Scholar 

  9. Levy D (2006) Marriage and sex with robots. In: EURON workshop on roboethics, Genoa

    Google Scholar 

  10. Levy D (2007) Intimate relationships with artificial partners. PhD thesis, Maastricht University

    Google Scholar 

  11. Levy D (2007) Love and sex with robots: the evolution of human-robot relationships. Harper Collins

    Google Scholar 

  12. Muzyka K (2013) The outline of personhood law regarding artificial intelligences and emulated human entities. J Artif Gen Intell 4(3):164–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pawelski JG, Perrin EC, Foy JM, Allen CE, Crawford JE, Del Monte M, Kaufman M, Klein JD, Smith K, Springer S et al (2006) The effects of marriage, civil union, and domestic partnership laws on the health and well-being of children. Pediatrics 118(1):349–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rule S (1989) Rights for gay couples in denmark. The New York Times 2

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sparrow R (2011) Can machines be people? reflections on the turing triage test. Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 301

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stone LS (2004) Gay marriage and anthropology. Anthropol. News 45(5):10–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Turkle S (2011) Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wettig S, Zehendner E (2003) The electronic agent: a legal personality under german law. In: Proceedings of the law and electronic agents workshop (LEA03), pp 97–112

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zimmerman EJ (2015) Machine minds: frontiers in legal personhood

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Yann Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cheok, A.D., Zhang, E.Y. (2019). Why Not Marry a Robot?. In: Human–Robot Intimate Relationships. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94730-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94730-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94729-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94730-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics