Abstract
Some attempts to answer the title question require a clarification of what is meant be “alive”—how the word is defined by biologists, other scientists, philosophers and experts from other disciplines. Such attempts fail because of the lack of a suitable definition of “alive” to serve as our starting point. This failure prompts us to consider various sets of criteria of life, criteria that have been promoted as enabling us to determine whether or not a particular entity is alive. This attempt too fails, because there are so many such sets and so many differences between them that they create confusion rather than clarity. We also consider a more general set of criteria, a set devised in the 1970s and known collectively as Living Systems Theory, which does not rely on traditional biological considerations. Here we have more success—if the theory is correct we may indeed conclude that robots are alive. We then examine how advances in the various 21st century branches of biology have paved the way for the birth of a new science—Living Technology—which brings us much closer to being able to provide a definitive answer to our title question.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The contents of this chapter is from Dr. David Levy
- 2.
Wikipedia. “Characteristics of life”. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life.
- 3.
Youtube. Video of self-reproducing robot. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZwTcLeelAY.
- 4.
Craig Venter’s Ted talk. “Watch me unveil “synthestic life”, 2010. http://www.ted.com/talks/craig_venter_unveils_synthetic_life?language=en.
- 5.
Wikipedia. “Biologically-Inspired Computing” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bio-inspired_computing.
- 6.
Anthony Sebastian. “Stanford creates biological transistors.” Extreme Tech, March 29th 2013. http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/152074-stanford-creates-biological-transistors-the-final-step-towards-computers-inside-living-cells.
- 7.
Anthony Sebastian. “Harvard cracks DNA storage, crams 700”. Extreme Tech, August 17th, 2012. http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/134672-harvard-cracks-dna-storage-crams-700-terabytes-of-data-into-a-single-gram.
- 8.
OED online. http://www.oed.com/.
References
(1999) Bestseller: Wired, Analog and Digital Writings, Pulpless.Com, Inc., chap The Civil Rights of Robots, pp 247–251
Aristotle (350 BC) De anima. http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.html, translated by J. A. Smith
Bedau M (2009) Living technology today and tomorrow. Technoetic Arts: A J Specul Res 7(2):199–206
Bedau M, McCaskill J, Packard N, Rasmussen S (2010) Living technology: exploiting life’s principles in technology. Artificial Life 16(1):89–97
Bedau MA, Hansen PG, Parke E (2009) Living technology: 5 questions. Automatic Press
Bonnet J, Yin P, Ortiz ME, Subsoontorn P, Endy D (2013) Amplifying genetic logic gates. Science 340(6132):599–603
Braich R, Chelyapov N, Johnson C, Rothemund P, Adelman L (2002) Problem on a dna computer. Science 296:499–502
Butler S (1863) Darwin among the machines. The Press
Cohen H (1995) The further exploits of aaron, painter. Stanf Humanit Rev 4(2):141–158
Cope D (2004) Virtual music: computer synthesis of musical style. MIT press
Da Costa F (1978) Arasem: a programming approach for robots. Interface Age pp 156–157
Deplazes A, Huppenbauer M (2009) Synthetic organisms and living machines. Syst Synth Biol 3(1–4):55
Deplazes-Zemp A (2012) The conception of life in synthetic biology. Sci Eng Ethics 18(4):757–774
Dibbell J (1996) The race to build intelligent machines. Time 147(13):56–58
Etxeberria A, Ruiz-Mirazo K (2009) The challenging biology of transients. EMBO Rep 10(1S):S33–S36
European Commission IS, Media (2011) Living technology artificial systems embodied evolution. FET Consultation Workshop Report
Evans-Pughe C (2011) Programming through biology. Eng Technol Mag 6(12)
Foundation S (2001) “can a machine be conscious?” cold spring harbor laboratory workshop. http://www.theswartzfoundation.org/banbury_e.asp
Freitas RA (1985) The legal rights of robots. Stud Lawyer 13(1):54–56
Gallup GG (1977) Self recognition in primates: a comparative approach to the bidirectional properties of consciousness. Am Psychol 32(5):329
Holland O (2003) Machine consciousness. Imprint Academic
Hsu FH (2002) Behind deep blue: building the computer that defeated the world chess champion. Princeton University Press
Ieropoulos I, Melhuish C, Greenman J, Horsfield I (2005) Ecobot-ii: an artificial agent with a natural metabolism. Int J Adv Robot Syst 2(4):31
Kahn PH, Gary HE, Shen S (2013) Children’s social relationships with current and near-future robots. Child Dev Perspect 7(1):32–37
Khalil AS, Collins JJ (2010) Synthetic biology: applications come of age. Nat Rev Genet 11(5):367–379
Klir J, Valach M (1967) Cybernetic modelling
Koshland DE (2002) The seven pillars of life. Science 295(5563):2215–2216
Lazcano A (2014) A question without answers? Metascience 23:301–304
Lehman-Wilzig SN (1981) Frankenstein unbound: towards a legal definition of artificial intelligence. Futures 13(6):442–457
Levy D (2005) Robots unlimited: life in a virtual age. A. K. Peters Ltd., Wellesley
Levy D (2007) Love and sex with robots: the evolution of human-robot relationships. Harper Collins
Levy D (2009) The ethical treatment of artificially conscious robots. Int J Soc Robot 1(3):209–216
Lycan WG (1987) Consciousness. MIT Press
McCarthy J (2000) Free will-even for robots. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 12(3):341–352
Michie D (1980) P-kp4; expert system to human being conceptual checkmate of dark ingenuity. Computing
Miller J (1995) Living systems. University Press of Colorado
Miller J, Miller J (1992) Greater than the sum of its parts. i. subsystems which process both matter-energy and information. Behav Sci 37(1):1–38
Miller J, Miller J (1993) Greater than the sum of its parts ii. matter-energy processing subsystems. Behav Sci 38(1):1–73
Miller JG (1978) Living systems. McGraw-Hill
Mitchell M (2010) Biological computation. Comput J 55(7):852–855
Prescott TJ, Lepora N, Verschure PF (2014) A future of living machines? international trends and prospects in biomimetic and biohybrid systems. In: Proceedings of SPIE, society of photo-optical instrumentation engineers (SPIE), vol 9055
Rostand J, Tetry A, et al (1971) Larousse science of life
Simons G (1983) Are computers alive. Evolution and new life forms Harvester[DRV]
Stone CD (2010) Should trees have standing?: law, morality, and the environment. Oxford University Press
Takeno J, Inaba K, Suzuki T (2005) Experiments and examination of mirror image cognition using a small robot. In: Computational intelligence in robotics and automation, 2005. CIRA 2005. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE international symposium on, IEEE, pp 493–498
Trifonov EN (2011) Vocabulary of definitions of life suggests a definition. J Biomol Struct Dyn 29(2):259–266
Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59(236):433–460
Turkle S (2011) Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books
Von Neumann J, Burks AW (1996) Theory of self-reproducing automata. University of Illinois Press Urbana
Weizenbaum J (1976) Computer power and human reason: from judgment to calculation
Wolfram S (2010) Computation and the future of the human condition. Talk given at the h+ summit @ harvard. http://www.stephenwolfram.com/publications/computation-future-human-condition/
Zykov V, Mytilinaios E, Adams B, Lipson H (2005) Robotics: self-reproducing machines. Nature 435(7039):163–164
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheok, A.D., Zhang, E.Y. (2019). Are Robots Alive?. In: Human–Robot Intimate Relationships. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94730-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94730-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94729-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94730-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)