Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Huggy Pajama: Remote Hug System for Family Communication

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human–Robot Intimate Relationships

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

Touch is a quintessential expression of love and intimacy. It comprises a large part of non-verbal human communication, and plays a signification role in conveying emotions, building relationship bonds, and improving mental and physical well-being. A major technical challenge in making robots and virtual characters that interact with humans on a physical and emotional level is mutual robotic touch. Novel touch sensing and actuation systems need to be developed in order to endow such digital partners with this emotional sense. This chapter presents an early work of a series of projects on digital touch we have been working on in our lab over the last ten years or so. Huggy Pajama is a remote hugging communication system that allows family members to hug each other over the Internet. The input interface is a small, mobile device that measures human touch force, whereas the output interface is a wearable jacket with embedded pneumatic actuators for force actuation. The results of this work made it possible to substantiate the development of subsequent robotic touch communication systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The HugShirt. CuteCircuit. http://cutecircuit.com/the-hug-shirt/.

  2. 2.

    Fingertips sensor system. Pressure Profile Systems. https://pressureprofile.com/finger-tps.

  3. 3.

    Force Sensitive Resistors. Tekscan. https://www.tekscan.com/force-sensitive-resistors-comparing-options.

  4. 4.

    QTC sensors. http://www.peratech.com/.

  5. 5.

    Football Engineering @ Carnegie Mellon University. http://www.footballtracking.org/projects.jsp.

  6. 6.

    QTC sensors. http://www.peratech.com/.

  7. 7.

    Muscle Wires. http://www.musclewires.com.

  8. 8.

    Shadow 30 mm Air Muscle. http://www.shadowrobot.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/datasheet_30mm_sam.pdf.

References

  1. Analog Devices (2007) Programmable capacitive to digital converter with environmental compensation AD7142. Product application publication retrieved from www.analog.com

  2. Bonanni L, Vaucelle C, Lieberman J, Zuckerman O (2006) Playpals: tangible interfaces for remote communication and play. In: CHI ’06: CHI ’06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125572

  3. Bonanni L, Vaucelle C, Lieberman J, Zuckerman O (2006) Taptap: a haptic wearable for asynchronous distributed touch therapy. In: CHI ’06: CHI ’06 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 580–585

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borgers N, Hox J (2000) Reliability of responses in questionnaire research with children plus coding scheme: a technical report. In: the 5th international conference on logic and methodology, pp 3–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borgers N, de Leeuw E, Hox J (2000) Children as respondents in survey research: cognitive development and response quality. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de M Thodologie Sociologique 66(1):60–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borgers N, Hox J, Sikkel D (2003) Response quality in survey research with children and adolescents: the effect of labelled response options and vague quantifiers. Int Pub Opin Res 15(1):83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391:756–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bowlby J (1982) Attachment and loss. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bradley M, Lang P (1994) Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 25:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brave S, Ishii H, Dahley A (1998) Tangible interfaces for remote collaboration and communication. In: CSCW ’98: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1145/289444.289491

  11. Brewster SA, Chohan F, Brown LM (2007) Tactile feedback for mobile interactions. ACM Press Addison-Wesley, Reading, p 159

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carlson M (1998) Understanding the ‘mother’s touch’. Harv Mahoney Neurosci Inst Lett Brain 7(1)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cassell J, Thorisson KR (1999) The power of a nod and a glance: envelope vs. emotional feedback in animated conversational agents. Appl Artif Intell 13(4–5):519–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang SO (2001) The conceptual structure of physical touch in caring. J Adv Nurs 33(6):820–827. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01721.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen D, Haviland-Jones J (2000) Human olfactory communication of emotion. Percept Mot Sk 91(3):771–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dykes RW, McBain D (2011) Cutaneous receptors. Encyclopaedia of occupational health and safety

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ekman P, Friesen WV (1971) Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. J Personal Soc Psychol 17(2):124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Erp JBFV, Veen HAHCV, Jansen C, Dobbins T (2005) Waypoint navigation with a vibrotactile waist belt. ACM Trans Appl Percept 2(2):106–117. https://doi.org/10.1145/1060581.1060585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fogg B, Cutler LD, Arnold P, Eisbach C (1998) Handjive: a device for interpersonal haptic entertainment. In: CHI ’98: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA, pp 57–64

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fosshage JL (2000) The meanings of touch in psychoanalysis: a time for reassessment. Psychoanal Inq 20(1):20–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gemperle F, DiSalvo C, Forlizzi J, Yonkers W (2003) The hug: a new form for communication. In: DUX ’03: proceedings of the 2003 conference on designing for user experiences, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/997078.997103

  22. Greenbaum PE, Turner C, Cook EW, Melamed BG (1990) Dentists’ voice control: effects on children’s disruptive and affective behavior. Health Psychol 9(9):546–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guyton A (1991) Textbook of medical physiology. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelpia

    Google Scholar 

  24. Haans A, IJsselsteijn W (2006) Mediated social touch: a review of current research and future directions. Virtual Real 9(2):149–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-005-0014-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haans A, de Nood C, IJsselsteijn WA (2007) Investigating response similarities between real and mediated social touch: a first test. CHI ’07: CHI ’07 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 2405–2410

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hatzfeld C (2014) Haptics as an interaction modality, pp 29–100

    Google Scholar 

  27. Heller MA, Heller MA, Schiff W (1991) The psychology of touch. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  28. Henley N (1977) Body politics: power, sex and nonverbal communication. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  29. Heslin R, Boss D (1980) Nonverbal intimacy in airport arrival and departure. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 6:248–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Holleis P, Schmidt A, Paasovaara S, Puikkonen A, Häkkilä J (2008) Evaluating capacitive touch input on clothes. In: MobileHCI ’08: proceedings of the 10th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 81–90

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hudson SE (2004) Using light emitting diode arrays as touch-sensitive input and output devices. In: UIST ’04: Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 287–290

    Google Scholar 

  32. Interlink Electronics (2007) Force sensing resistor integration guide. Product manual retrieved from Interlink Electronics Inc. www.interlinkelectronics.com

  33. Jokiniemi M, Raisamo R, Lylykangas J, Surakka V (2008) Crossmodal rhythm perception. Haptic and audio interaction design. Springer, Berlin, pp 111–119

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kiatkamjornwong S (2007) Superabsorbent polymers and superabsorbent polymer composites. Sci Asia 33(s1):39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Killeen C (1998) Loneliness: an epidemic in modern society. J Adv Nurs 28(4):762–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ (2003) Touch. Handbook of psychology: experimental psychology, vol 4. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 147–176

    Google Scholar 

  37. Klopper R (2005) The evolution of human communication from nonverbal communication to electronic communications. Alternation 12(1a):107–120

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lee M (2007) The art of capacitive touch sensing. Cypress perform, Published in Embedded com (http://www.embedded.com), pp 1–10

  39. Lee P, Cheok D, James S, Debra L, Jie W, Chuang W, Farbiz F (2006) A mobile pet wearable computer and mixed reality system for human-poultry interaction through the internet. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 10(5):301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee SK Buxton W (1985) A multi-touch three dimensional touch-sensitive tablet. In: Proceedings of the CHI85 conference on human factors in computing systems, p 21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lewis JR (1995) Ibm computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int J Hum-Comput Interact 7(1):57–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lindeman RW, Page R, Yanagida Y, Sibert JL (2004) Towards full-body haptic feedback: the design and deployment of a spatialized vibrotactile feedback system. In: VRST ’04: proceedings of the ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 146–149

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lussey D (1998) Invention of new polymer composition. US Patent WO98/33193

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lussey D (1999) Invention of new polymer composition. US Patent WO99/38173

    Google Scholar 

  45. Maccoby E, Maccoby N (1954) The interview: a tool of social science. In: Lindzey G (ed) Handbook of social psychology, theory and method, vol 1. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mehrabian A, Ferris SR (1967) Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. J Consult Psychol 31(3):248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Morgan Electro Ceramics Ltd (2007) Technical publication tp0238 on piezoelectricity. http://www.morganelectroceramics.com

  48. Mori M (1970) The uncanny valley. Energy 7(4):33–35

    Google Scholar 

  49. Moszkowski R, Stack D (2007) Infant touching behaviour during mother-infa, nt face-to-face interactions. Infant Child Dev 16:307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mueller F, Vetere F, Gibbs MR, Kjeldskov J, Pedell S, Howard S (2005) Hug over a distance. In: CHI’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 1673–1676

    Google Scholar 

  51. Neuberger J (2008) Are we too afraid of touch? The Sunday Times

    Google Scholar 

  52. Paskind JK (2004) NSF 2002 Senior design projects to aid persons with disabilities. Creative Learning Press, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pelaez-Nogueras M, Field T, Hossain Z, Pickens J (1996) Depressed mothers’ touching increases infants’ positive affect and attention in still-face interactions. Child Dev 67:1780–1792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pressure Profile Systems Inc (2010) Capacitive primer- tactile sensor array. Product manual retrieved from www.pressureprofile.com

  55. Ranasinghe N, Zhu K, Abeyrathne D, Danjo M, Karunanayaka K, Edirisinghe CP, Nancy LLM, Morisawa Y, Peiris RL, Teh JKS et al (2010) Kawaii/cute interactive media. Springer, Berlin, pp 223–253

    Google Scholar 

  56. Raskar R, Welch G, Cutts M, Lake A, Stesin L, Fuchs H (1998) The office of the future: a unified approach to image-based modeling and spatially immersive displays. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM, pp 179–188

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rekimoto J (2002) Smartskin: an infrastructure for freehand manipulation of interactive surfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing system: changing our world, changing ourselves, Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp 113–120

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rochlis JL, Newman DJ (2000) A tactile display for international space station (ISS) extravehicular activity (EVA). Aviat Space Environ Med 71(6):571–578

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sekiguchi D, Inami M, Tachi S (2001) RobotPHONE: RUI for interpersonal communication. In: CHI ’01: CHI ’01 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 277–278. https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634231

  60. Seongtae B (2007) Sensors of biomedical application. Lecture material for National University of Singapore Course EE4601

    Google Scholar 

  61. Spelmezan D, Jacobs M, Hilgers A, Borchers J (2009) Tactile motion instructions for physical activities. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems CHI 09 (C), p 2243

    Google Scholar 

  62. Stiehl WD, Breazeal C, Han KH, Lieberman J, Lalla L, Maymin A, Salinas J, Fuentes D, Toscano R, Tong CH, Kishore A, Berlin M, Gray J (2006) The huggable: a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. In: SIGGRAPH ’06: ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 emerging technologies, ACM, New York, NY, USA, p 15

    Google Scholar 

  63. Vaucelle C, Abbas Y (2007) Touch: sensitive apparel. In: CHI ’07: CHI ’07 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 2723–2728. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1241069

  64. Vaucelle C, Africano D, Davenport G, Wiberg M, Fjellstrom O (2005) Moving pictures: looking out/looking in. In: SIGGRAPH ’05: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 educators program, ACM, New York, NY, USA, p 27. https://doi.org/10.1145/1187358.1187391

  65. Weinstein S (1968) Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex and laterality. The skin senses. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  66. White K (2004) Touch: attachment and the body. Karnac Books, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Imagineering Institute, Iskander Puteri, Malaysia

    Adrian David Cheok & Emma Yann Zhang

Authors
  1. Adrian David Cheok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emma Yann Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Yann Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cheok, A.D., Zhang, E.Y. (2019). Huggy Pajama: Remote Hug System for Family Communication. In: Human–Robot Intimate Relationships. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94730-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94730-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94729-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94730-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation