Abstract
The ethical aspects of robotics have recently gained sufficient importance to be debated in international forums and to be endowed with their own collective nametag—roboethics. Almost all of the discussion within the roboethics community and elsewhere has thus far centred on questions of the form: “Is it ethical to develop and use robots for such-and-such a purpose?”, questions based upon doubts about the effect that a particular type of robot is likely to have, both on society in general and on those with whom the robots will interact in particular. What has usually been missing from the debate is the complementary question: “Is it ethical to treat robots in such-and-such a way?” Here we attempt to redress the balance, having first reviewed some of the relevant literature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The content of this chapter is from Dr. David Levy.
- 2.
CBC News, 7 March 2007, “Ethical code for robots in works, South Korea says”. http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/ethical-code-for-robots-in-works-south-korea-says-1.634822.
- 3.
Lee Billings, 2007. “Rise of Roboethics. Grappling with the Implications of an Artificially Intelligent Culture”, Seed Magazine. http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2007/07/rise_of_roboethics.php.
References
Aleksander I (1995) Artificial neuroconsciousness an update. From natural to artificial neural computation, pp 566–583
Arkin RC, Moshkina L (2007) Lethality and autonomous robots: An ethical stance. In: IEEE International symposium on technology and society, 2007. ISTAS 2007. IEEE, pp 1–3
Calverley D (2005a) Toward a method for determining the legal status of a conscious machine. In: AISB 2005 symposium on next generation approaches to machine consciousness: imagination, development, intersubjectivity, and embodiment, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield
Calverley DJ (2005b) Android science and the animal rights movement: are there analogies. In: Cognitive sciences society workshop, Stresa, Italy, pp 127–136
Chella A, Manzotti R (2007) Artificial consciousness. Imprint Academic
Clark RE, Squire LR (1998) Classical conditioning and brain systems: the role of awareness. Science 280(5360):77–81
Clark RE, Squire LR (1999) Human eyeblink classical conditioning: effects of manipulating awareness of the stimulus contingencies. Psychol Sci 10(1):14–18
Clowes R, Torrance S, Chrisley R (2007) Machine consciousness. J Conscious Stud 14(7):7–14
De Quincey C (2006) Switched-on consciousness: clarifying what it means. J Conscious Stud 13(4):7–12
Economist T (2007) Robot wars. The Economist http://www.economist.com/node/9249201
Freitas RA (1985) The legal rights of robots. Stud Lawyer 13(1):54–56
Freud S, Sprott WJH, Strachey J (1933) New introductory lectures on psycho-analysis, vol 22. Norton, New York
Gallup GG (1977) Self recognition in primates: a comparative approach to the bidirectional properties of consciousness. Am Psychol 32(5):329
Holland O (2003) Machine consciousness. Imprint Academic
Koch C (2004) The quest for consciousness: a neurobiological approach. Roberts and Company Publishers
Levy D (2005) Robots unlimited: life in a virtual age. A. K. Peters Ltd., Wellesley
Levy D (2007a) Intimate relationships with artificial partners. PhD thesis, Maastricht University
Levy D (2007b) Love and sex with robots: the evolution of human-robot relationships. Harper Collins
Owen J, Osley R (2007) Bill of rights for abused robots. The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/bill-of-rights-for-abused-robots-5332596.html
Pinker S (1997) Could a computer ever be conscious? US News World Rep 123(7)
Ramey CH (2005) “For the sake of others”: the personal ethics of human–android interaction. In: Proceedings of the CogSci 2005 workshop: toward social mechanisms of android science, pp 137–148
Sloman A (1996) A systematic approach to consciousness. (how to avoid talking nonesense?). http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/consciousness.rsa.text
Solum LB (1991) Legal personhood for artificial intelligences. NCL Rev 70:1231
Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? the future of aged care. Minds Mach 16(2):141–161
Takeno J, Inaba K, Suzuki T (2005) Experiments and examination of mirror image cognition using a small robot. In: 2005 IEEE international symposium on computational intelligence in robotics and automation, 2005. CIRA 2005. Proceedings. IEEE, pp 493–498
Torrance S (2004) Could we, should we, create conscious robots? In: Health, social and environmental issues, p 43
Torrance S (2008) Ethics and consciousness in artificial agents. Ai Soc 22(4):495–521
Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59(236):433–460
Veruggio G (2006) The euron roboethics roadmap. In: 2006 6th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots. IEEE, pp 612–617
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheok, A.D., Zhang, E.Y. (2019). The Ethical Treatment of Artificially Conscious Robots. In: Human–Robot Intimate Relationships. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94730-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94730-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94729-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94730-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)