Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Smartphone Paradox
  • 2494 Accesses

Abstract

The introductory chapter introduces key terminology that runs throughout the book and frames the problem inherent to all technology: that it can be both good and bad, but that it is not neutral. This view, which is the framework for Kranzberg’s First Law of Technology, is applied specifically to smartphones and how our devices are reflections of ourselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Brewer, Judson. 2017. The Craving Mind: From Cigarettes to Smartphones to Love—Why We Get Hooked and How We Can Break Bad Habits. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  2. 2.

    Bode, C. (Ed.). 1974. The Portable Thoreau. New York: The Viking Press, Inc.

  3. 3.

    Dimock, Michael. 2018. Defining generations: Where Millennials end and post-Millennials begin. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/01/defining-generations-where-millennials-end-and-post-millennials-begin/. Accessed 12 May 2018.

  4. 4.

    Dynarski, Susan. 2017. Laptops are great. But not during a lecture or a meeting. The New York Times, November 22, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/22/business/laptops-not-during-lecture-or-meeting.html?smid=tw-share. Accessed 12 Jan 2018.

  5. 5.

    Cohn, Jenae. 2016. ‘Devilish smartphones’ and the ‘stone-cold’ internet: Implications of the technology addiction trope in college student digital literacy narratives. Computers and Composition 42: 80–94.

  6. 6.

    Leung, Louis and Ran Wei. 1998. The gratifications of pager use: Sociability, information seeking, entertainment, utility, and fashion and status. Telematics and Informatics 15: 253–264.

  7. 7.

    Reid, Alan J. and Chelsea N. Thomas. 2017. A case study in smartphone usage and gratification in the age of narcissism. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction 13: 40–56.

  8. 8.

    Lynch, Michael P. 2016. The Internet of Us: Knowing More and Understanding Less in the Age of Big Data. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.

  9. 9.

    Kumar, Santhosh and Rahul P. Menon. 2017. Brand loyalty of customers in smartphone brands. Indian Journal of Marketing 47: 8–15.

  10. 10.

    Shaw, Heather, David A. Ellis, Libby Rae Kendrick, Fenja Ziegler and Richard Wiseman. 2016. Predicting smartphone operating system from personality and individual differences. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 19: 727–732.

  11. 11.

    Lancaster University. 2016. What your choice of smartphone says about you. ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/11/161121144206.htm. Accessed 30 Nov 2017.

  12. 12.

    Meyer, Evi. 2017. iPhone X—Top ‘notch’. Medium, September 25. https://medium.com/the-mission/iphone-x-top-notch-204e9284f54a. Accessed 2 Nov 2017.

  13. 13.

    Clover, Juli. 2017. Embracing the notch: How are you adapting to the most controversial iPhone X design decision? MacRumors, November 14. https://www.macrumors.com/2017/11/14/iphone-x-embracing-the-notch/. Accessed 10 Dec 2017.

  14. 14.

    Wei, Ran and Ven-Hwei Lo. 2006. Staying connected while on the move: Cell phone use and social connectedness. New Media & Society 8: 53–72.

  15. 15.

    Mannering, Lindsay. 2015. Now playing in your headphones: Nothing. The New York Times, December 22. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/24/fashion/headphones-now-playing-nothing.html. Accessed 1 Dec 2017.

  16. 16.

    Dwoskin, Elizabeth. 2015. Lending startups look at borrowers’ phone usage to assess creditworthiness. Wall Street Journal, November 30. https://www.wsj.com/articles/lending-startups-look-at-borrowers-phone-usage-to-assess-creditworthiness-1448933308. Accessed 14 Jan 2017.

  17. 17.

    Lee, Heyoung, Heejune Ahn, Trung Giang Nguyen, Sam-Wook Choi and Dae Jin Kim. 2017. Comparing the self-report and measured smartphone usage of college students: A pilot study. Psychiatry Investigation 14: 198–204.

  18. 18.

    Winnick, Michael. 2016. Putting a finger on our phone obsession. dscout. https://blog.dscout.com/mobile-touches. Accessed 4 May 2017.

  19. 19.

    Thatcher, Andrew, Gisela Wretschko and Peter Fridjhon. 2008. Online flow experiences, problematic Internet use and Internet procrastination. Computers in Human Behavior 24: 2236–2254.

  20. 20.

    Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 2014. Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology: The Collected Works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. New York: Springer.

  21. 21.

    Chen, Chongyang, Kem Z.K. Zheng, Xiang Gong, Sesia Zhao, Matthew K.O. Lee and Liang Liang. 2017. Understanding compulsive smartphone use: An empirical test of a flow-based model. International Journal of Information Management 37: 438–454.

  22. 22.

    Ward, Adrian F., Kristen Duke, Ayelet Gneezy and Maarten W. Bos. 2017. Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 2: 140–154.

  23. 23.

    Thornton, Bill, Alyson Faires, Maija Robbins and Eric Rollins. 2014. The mere presence of a cell phone may be distracting: Implications for attention and task performance. Social Psychology 45: 479–488.

  24. 24.

    Cheever, Nancy, Larry D. Rosen, L. Mark Carrier and Amber Chavez. 2014. Out of sight is not out of mind: The impact of restricting wireless mobile device use on anxiety levels among low, moderate and high users. Computers in Human Behavior 37: 290–297.

  25. 25.

    It is no doubt that digital books have had an effect on print book sales, though not nearly to the extent that it has been predicted over the years. Surveys consistently find that there is a general preference for paper-based text over the digital, and that students routinely choose print over digital textbooks, despite the cost difference. In short, digital text has not replaced the print book entirely, but it does pose an observable threat. Chapter 5 addresses this in more depth.

  26. 26.

    Meloncon, Lisa. 2014. Rhetorical Accessability. New York: Routledge.

  27. 27.

    Alzahabi, Reem, Mark W. Becker and David Z. Hambrick. 2017. Investigating the relationship between media multitasking and processes involved in task-switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 43: 1872–1894.

  28. 28.

    Loh, Kep Kee and Ryota Kanai. 2014. Higher media multi-tasking activity is associated with smaller gray-matter density in the anterior cingulate cortex. PLoS One 9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106698.

  29. 29.

    van der Schuur, Winneke A., Susanne E. Baumgartner, Sindy R. Sumter and Patti M. Valkenburg. 2018. Media multitasking and sleep problems: A longitudinal study among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior 81: 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.024.

  30. 30.

    Kranzberg, Melvin. 1986. Technology and history: Kranzberg’s laws. Technology and Culture 27: 544–560.

  31. 31.

    McLuhan, Marshall and Quentin Fiore. 1967. The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects. New York; London; Toronto: Bantam Books.

  32. 32.

    Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper & Row.

  33. 33.

    Williams, Raymond. 1974. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. New York: Schocken.

  34. 34.

    Kaczynski, Ted. 1995. Industrial Society and Its Future. http://editions-hache.com/essais/pdf/kaczynski2.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2018.

  35. 35.

    Finnegan, Ruth. 1988. Literacy and Orality: Studies in the Technology of Communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  36. 36.

    Carr, Nicholas G. 2011. The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

  37. 37.

    Mackay, Hughie and Gareth Gillespie. 1992. Extending the social shaping of technology approach: Ideology and appropriation. Social Studies of Science 22: 685–716.

  38. 38.

    Williams, Robin and David Edge. 1996. The social shaping of technology. Research Policy 25: 865–899.

  39. 39.

    Brabscome, James. 1971. Appalachia—Like the flayed back of a man. The New York Times, December 12. https://www.nytimes.com/1971/12/12/archives/appalachia-like-the-flayed-back-of-a-man-like-the-flayed-back-of-a.html. Accessed 22 Feb 2018.

  40. 40.

    Winner, Langdon. 1980. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109: 121–136. http://innovate.ucsb.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Winner-Do-Artifacts-Have-Politics-1980.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2017.

  41. 41.

    McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  42. 42.

    Selinger, Evan. 2012. The philosophy of the technology of the gun. The Atlantic, July 23. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/the-philosophy-of-the-technology-of-the-gun/260220/. Accessed 22 Jan 2018.

  43. 43.

    Smith, Alexander. 2017. The vast majority of UK police don’t carry guns. Here’s why. NBC News, September 15. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/why-london-won-t-arm-all-police-despite-severe-terror-n737551. Accessed 1 Nov 2017.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Reid, A.J. (2018). Introduction. In: The Smartphone Paradox. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94319-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics