Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Partial Knee Arthroplasty pp 69–79Cite as

Functional Results and Survival of Femorotibial Partial Knee Arthroplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 804 Accesses

Abstract

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) represents a valid option in patients whose osteoarthritis is limited to one compartment of the knee. However, survivorship and functional results of UKA have been mixed, mainly due to indications and patient selection. This chapter will analyze the clinical results of UKA inside a number of clusters or patient comorbidities. UKAs in the medial and lateral compartment will be analyzed independently, as well as clinical results of UKAs in the young and elderly patients. Obesity and concomitant patellofemoral arthritis are two additional controversial comorbidities, which are described separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, knee & shoulder arthroplasty: 2017 annual report. Adelaide: AOA; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 14th Annual Report of the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. National Joint Registry. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk. 2017.

  3. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register – Annual Report 2017. http://www.knee.se, http://www.gangbar.se. 2017.

  4. The New Zealand Joint Registry Seventeen Year Report (January 1999–December 2016). http://www.nzoa.org.nz. NZOA; 2017.

  5. Kozinn SC, Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(1):145–50. PubMed PMID: 2643607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Adams JB, Groseth KL. Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:60–6. PubMed PMID: 16239785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heck DA, Marmor L, Gibson A, Rougraff BT. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:154–9. PubMed PMID: 8425338.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bonutti PM, Goddard MS, Zywiel MG, Khanuja HS, Johnson AJ, Mont MA. Outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty stratified by body mass index. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(8):1149–53. PubMed PMID: 21256695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kandil A, Werner BC, Gwathmey WF, Browne JA. Obesity, morbid obesity and their related medical comorbidities are associated with increased complications and revision rates after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2015;30(3):456–60. PubMed PMID: 25453628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cavaignac E, Lafontan V, Reina N, Pailhe R, Wargny M, Laffosse JM, et al. Obesity has no adverse effect on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement at a minimum follow-up of seven years. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(8):1064–8. PubMed PMID: 23908421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Murray DW, Pandit H, Weston-Simons JS, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Lombardi AV, et al. Does body mass index affect the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement? Knee. 2013;20(6):461–5. PubMed PMID: 23110877.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Naal FD, Neuerburg C, Salzmann GM, Kriner M, von Knoch F, Preiss S, et al. Association of body mass index and clinical outcome 2 years after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129(4):463–8. PubMed PMID: 18414881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Plate JF, Augart MA, Seyler TM, Bracey DN, Hoggard A, Akbar M, et al. Obesity has no effect on outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(3):645–51. PubMed PMID: 25863681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tabor OB Jr, Tabor OB, Bernard M, Wan JY. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term success in middle-age and obese patients. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2005;14(2):59–63. PubMed PMID: 16115429.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Emerson RH Jr, Hansborough T, Reitman RD, Rosenfeldt W, Higgins LL. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee implant. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:62–70. PubMed PMID: 12439239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Beard DJ, Pandit H, Gill HS, Hollinghurst D, Dodd CA, Murray DW. The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89(12):1597–601. PubMed PMID: 18057359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Beard DJ, Pandit H, Ostlere S, Jenkins C, Dodd CA, Murray DW. Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89(12):1602–7. PubMed PMID: 18057360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamilton TW, Pandit HG, Maurer DG, Ostlere SJ, Jenkins C, Mellon SJ, et al. Anterior knee pain and evidence of osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint should not be considered contraindications to mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(5):632–9. PubMed PMID: 28455472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liddle AD, Pandit H, Jenkins C, Price AJ, Dodd CA, Gill HS, et al. Preoperative pain location is a poor predictor of outcome after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 1 and 5 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(11):2421–6. PubMed PMID: 23000922.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pandit H, Hamilton TW, Jenkins C, Mellon SJ, Dodd CA, Murray DW. The clinical outcome of minimally invasive phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up of 1000 UKAs. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(11):1493–500. PubMed PMID: 26530651.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Goodfellow JW, O’Connor J. Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;205:21–42. PubMed PMID: 3698380.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Smith G, Price AJ, Dodd CA, et al. Unnecessary contraindications for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 2011;93(5):622–8. PubMed PMID: 21511927.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thompson SA, Liabaud B, Nellans KW, Geller JA. Factors associated with poor outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: redefining the “classic” indications for surgery. J Arthroplast. 2013;28(9):1561–4. PubMed PMID: 23523214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Konan S, Haddad FS. Does location of patellofemoral chondral lesion influence outcome after Oxford medial compartmental knee arthroplasty? Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(10 Supple B):11–5. PubMed PMID: 27694510. Pubmed Central PMCID: 5047133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pongcharoen B, Reutiwarangkoon C. The comparison of anterior knee pain in severe and non severe arthritis of the lateral facet of the patella following a mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Springerplus. 2016;5:202. PubMed PMID: 27026898. Pubmed Central PMCID: 4769708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Song EK, Park JK, Park CH, Kim MC, Agrawal PR, Seon JK. No difference in anterior knee pain after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with or without patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(1):208–13. PubMed PMID: 25274099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG, et al. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(5):999–1006. PubMed PMID: 15866962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Foran JR, Brown NM, Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Galante JO. Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(1):102–8. PubMed PMID: 22895691. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3528926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumm J, Tamm A, Lintrop M, Tamm A. The prevalence and progression of radiographic knee osteoarthritis over 6 years in a population-based cohort of middle-aged subjects. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32(11):3545–50. PubMed PMID: 22083615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Noble J, Hamblen DL. The pathology of the degenerate meniscus lesion. J Bone Joint Surg. 1975;57(2):180–6. PubMed PMID: 1173585.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Faour-Martin O, Valverde-Garcia JA, Martin-Ferrero MA, Vega-Castrillo A, de la Red Gallego MA, Suarez de Puga CC, et al. Oxford phase 3 unicondylar knee arthroplasty through a minimally invasive approach: long-term results. Int Orthop. 2013;37(5):833–8. PubMed PMID: 23503637. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3631504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Argenson JN, Blanc G, Aubaniac JM, Parratte S. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(10):905–9. PubMed PMID: 23677357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Manzotti A, Cerveri P, Pullen C, Confalonieri N. A flat all-polyethylene tibial component in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a long-term study. Knee. 2014;21(Suppl 1):S20–5. PubMed PMID: 25382363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thienpont E, Opsomer G, Koninckx A, Houssiau F. Joint awareness in different types of knee arthroplasty evaluated with the forgotten joint score. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(1):48–51. PubMed PMID: 23688851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW. Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(6):793–801. PubMed PMID: 26033059.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sun PF, Jia YH. Mobile bearing UKA compared to fixed bearing TKA: a randomized prospective study. Knee. 2012;19(2):103–6. PubMed PMID: 21345681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Newman J, Pydisetty RV, Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009;91(1):52–7. PubMed PMID: 19092004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bruni D, Iacono F, Raspugli G, Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M. Is unicompartmental arthroplasty an acceptable option for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(5):1442–51. PubMed PMID: 22278850. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3314777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Cartier P. UKA after spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: a retrospective analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(5):613–7. PubMed PMID: 20734200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Parratte S, Argenson JN, Dumas J, Aubaniac JM. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for avascular osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:37–42. PubMed PMID: 17589365.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. O’Rourke MR, Gardner JJ, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Vittetoe DA, et al. The John Insall award: unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum twenty-one-year followup, end-result study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:27–37. PubMed PMID: 16239780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Price AJ, Waite JC, Svard U. Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;435:171–80. PubMed PMID: 15930935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Forster-Horvath C, Artz N, Hassaballa MA, Robinson JR, Porteous AJ, Murray JR, et al. Survivorship and clinical outcome of the minimally invasive Uniglide medial fixed bearing, all-polyethylene tibia, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 7.3years. Knee. 2016;23(6):981–6. PubMed PMID: 27506988.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998;80(6):983–9. PubMed PMID: 9853489.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hutt JR, Farhadnia P, Masse V, LaVigne M, Vendittoli PA. A randomised trial of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(6):786–92. PubMed PMID: 26033058.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN. No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):61–8. PubMed PMID: 21732024. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3237998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed tibial bearing unicompartimental knee prosthesis: a prospective randomized trial using a dedicated outcome score. Knee. 2004;11(5):357–62. PubMed PMID: 15351409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Gleeson RE, Evans R, Ackroyd CE, Webb J, Newman JH. Fixed or mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement? A comparative cohort study. Knee. 2004;11(5):379–84. PubMed PMID: 15351413.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Niinimaki T, Eskelinen A, Makela K, Ohtonen P, Puhto AP, Remes V. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty survivorship is lower than TKA survivorship: a 27-year Finnish registry study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(5):1496–501. PubMed PMID: 24249531. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3971215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, Murray DW. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet. 2014;384(9952):1437–45. PubMed PMID: 25012116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Scott RD. Lateral unicompartmental replacement: a road less traveled. Orthopedics. 2005;28(9):983–4. PubMed PMID: 16190078.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Argenson JN, Parratte S, Bertani A, Aubaniac JM, Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, et al. The new arthritic patient and arthroplasty treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Suppl 5):43–8. PubMed PMID: 19648624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lustig S, Elguindy A, Servien E, Fary C, Munini E, Demey G, et al. 5- to 16-year follow-up of 54 consecutive lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasties with a fixed-all polyethylene bearing. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(8):1318–25. PubMed PMID: 21414745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sah AP, Scott RD. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a medial approach. Study with an average five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):1948–54. PubMed PMID: 17768191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Smith JR, Robinson JR, Porteous AJ, Murray JR, Hassaballa MA, Artz N, et al. Fixed bearing lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty – short to midterm survivorship and knee scores for 101 prostheses. Knee. 2014;21(4):843–7. PubMed PMID: 24831525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Argenson JN, Parratte S, Bertani A, Flecher X, Aubaniac JM. Long-term results with a lateral unicondylar replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(11):2686–93. PubMed PMID: 18574650. Pubmed Central PMCID: 2565025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Aubaniac JM, Dennis DA, Northcut EJ, Anderson DT, et al. In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2002;17(8):1049–54. PubMed PMID: 12478517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Gunther TV, Murray DW, Miller R, Wallace DA, Carr AJ, O’Connor JJ, et al. Lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford meniscal knee. Knee. 1996;3:33–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Weston-Simons JS, Pandit H, Kendrick BJ, Jenkins C, Barker K, Dodd CA, et al. The mid-term outcomes of the Oxford domed lateral unicompartmental knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(1):59–64. PubMed PMID: 24395312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Altuntas AO, Alsop H, Cobb JP. Early results of a domed tibia, mobile bearing lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty from an independent centre. Knee. 2013;20(6):466–70. PubMed PMID: 23274066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Walker T, Gotterbarm T, Bruckner T, Merle C, Streit MR. Total versus unicompartmental knee replacement for isolated lateral osteoarthritis: a matched-pairs study. Int Orthop. 2014;38(11):2259–64. PubMed PMID: 25112651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Newman SDS, Altuntas A, Alsop H, Cobb JP. Up to 10 year follow-up of the Oxford domed lateral partial knee replacement from an independent centre. Knee 2017 Sep 30. PubMed PMID: 28974402.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Marson B, Prasad N, Jenkins R, Lewis M. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacements: early results from a district general hospital. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24(6):987–91. PubMed PMID: 23842661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Callaghan JJ. Unicompartmental knee replacement: introduction: where have we been? Where are we now? Where are we going? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;430:272–3. PubMed PMID: 15662335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Walker T, Streit J, Gotterbarm T, Bruckner T, Merle C, Streit MR. Sports, physical activity and patient-reported outcomes after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in young patients. J Arthroplast. 2015;30(11):1911–6. PubMed PMID: 26088397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Fisher N, Agarwal M, Reuben SF, Johnson DS, Turner PG. Sporting and physical activity following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2006;13(4):296–300. PubMed PMID: 16809040.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Hopper GP, Leach WJ. Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(10):973–9. PubMed PMID: 18696051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Felts E, Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN. Function and quality of life following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients 60 years of age or younger. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96(8):861–7. PubMed PMID: 21087906.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Biswas D, Van Thiel GS, Wetters NG, Pack BJ, Berger RA, Della Valle CJ. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients less than 55 years old: minimum of two years of follow-up. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(1):101–5. PubMed PMID: 23731786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Yang KY, Wang MC, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Minimally invasive unicondylar versus total condylar knee arthroplasty – early results of a matched-pair comparison. Singap Med J. 2003;44(11):559–62. PubMed PMID: 15007494.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Iacono F, Raspugli GF, Akkawi I, Bruni D, Filardo G, Budeyri A, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients over 75 years: a definitive solution? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(1):117–23. PubMed PMID: 26350386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Tadros BJ, Dabis J, Twyman R. Short-term outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the octogenarian population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25 PubMed PMID: 28744756.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ingale PA, Hadden WA. A review of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee in patients aged 80 years or older and comparison with younger groups. J Arthroplast. 2013;28(2):262–7. e2. PubMed PMID: 22819378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Siman H, Kamath AF, Carrillo N, Harmsen WS, Pagnano MW, Sierra RJ. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthritis in patients older than 75 years: comparable reoperation, revision, and complication rates. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(6):1792–7. PubMed PMID: 28215968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Lim JW, Cousins GR, Clift BA, Ridley D, Johnston LR. Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus age and gender matched total knee arthroplasty – functional outcome and survivorship analysis. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(9):1779–83. PubMed PMID: 24805827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Fabre-Aubrespy M, Ollivier M, Pesenti S, Parratte S, Argenson JN. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients older than 75 results in better clinical outcomes and similar survivorship compared to total knee arthroplasty. A matched controlled study. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(12):2668–71. PubMed PMID: 27480824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IFCA-Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza, Florence, Italy

    Alfredo Lamberti & Andrea Baldini

  2. University of Ferrara, Arcispedale Sant’Anna, Ferrara, Italy

    Lorenzo Filippone

  3. Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA

    Russell Windsor

Authors
  1. Alfredo Lamberti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lorenzo Filippone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Russell Windsor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrea Baldini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Locomotion, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France

    Jean-Noël A. Argenson

  2. University of Maryland St. Joseph Medical Center, Towson, MD, USA

    David F. Dalury

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lamberti, A., Filippone, L., Windsor, R., Baldini, A. (2019). Functional Results and Survival of Femorotibial Partial Knee Arthroplasty. In: Argenson, JN., Dalury, D. (eds) Partial Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94250-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94250-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94249-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94250-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation